A recent 911 call in Flagler County is being hailed as a textbook example of a citizen doing the right thing. After noticing a man driving with two young boys under suspicious circumstances, a caller followed the vehicle, stayed on the line with dispatch, and helped deputies intervene. During the call, the caller even threatened to step in personally—yet the outcome was widely praised, and the caller is now viewed as a hero.That reaction forces a hard question: why do similar actions in other cases lead to prison sentences or tragic failure?In this episode of Comm Center, we revisit two prior cases in light of the Flagler County call. In Georgia, Hannah Payne followed a driver she believed had committed a hit-and-run and was ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison, labeled a vigilante despite her stated intent to help. In Florida, the abduction of Denise Amber Lee exposed the devastating consequences when a caller could not maintain visual contact, allowing a killer to slip away during a series of catastrophic 911 failures.By comparing these three cases, we break down the thin and often invisible line between good citizens and vigilantes. We examine foreseeability, liability, dispatcher guidance, and how escalation—sometimes by seconds or a single sentence on a 911 call—can determine whether someone is praised, prosecuted, or left forever asking “what if.”This episode isn’t about assigning virtue or blame after the fact. It’s about understanding how outcomes are shaped in real time—and why every 911 call carries legal and moral consequences long before police arrive.