Attentional Democracy: Rhythm, Refusal, and the Ethics of Tempo - The Deeper Thinking Podcast cover art

Attentional Democracy: Rhythm, Refusal, and the Ethics of Tempo - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Attentional Democracy: Rhythm, Refusal, and the Ethics of Tempo - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 Attentional Democracy: Rhythm, Refusal, and the Ethics of Tempo The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated. For those drawn to the ethics of perception, the structure of care, and the politics of shared presence. #AttentionalDemocracy #HannahArendt #SimoneWeil #IrisMurdoch #ByungChulHan #Foucault #PhilosophyOfAttention In a time of shrinking focus and algorithmic persuasion, what becomes of the ethical life? This episode enters the contested field of attentional politics to ask: who gets seen, who disappears, and what forms of care emerge when perception is treated as a shared civic resource? Moving between Hannah Arendt’s notion of appearance, Simone Weil’s ethics of attention, and Iris Murdoch’s moral vision of vision itself, we explore how the act of noticing becomes both a burden and a birthright. Drawing on contemporary theorists like Byung-Chul Han and Michel Foucault, the episode questions what it would mean to democratize attention without collapsing it into spectacle or surveillance. Rather than propose a utopia of total visibility or clarity, we offer a slower hypothesis: that attentional democracy is not about maximizing awareness, but about making space for what exceeds grasp. Attention here is not currency—it is condition, communion, and claim. Reflections This episode stages attention not as a tool, but as a terrain—where ethics, memory, and responsibility unfold. Attention is not passive reception. It is the labor of recognition.Visibility without care is exposure. Care without attention is abstraction.What we attend to becomes real—not because it wasn't real before, but because it was unheld.Democracy demands more than inclusion—it requires perceptual solidarity.The right to appear is not a gift from power. It is the form through which power is redefined.Ethical attention resists urgency. It makes room for the unoptimized.To withhold attention can be violence. But to flood it can also erase.Distraction is not just a failure of focus—it is a symptom of dislocated care. Why Listen? Reframe attention as a civic and ethical act, not just a mental stateExplore how Arendt, Weil, and Murdoch conceive moral perceptionEngage with critiques of Han and Foucault on visibility, control, and soft violenceInvestigate what kind of institutions, rituals, or designs could sustain attentional care Listen On: YouTubeSpotifyApple Podcasts Support This Work If this episode resonates and you’d like to help sustain the series, you can support it here: Buy Me a Coffee Further Reading Hannah Arendt: The Human ConditionSimone Weil: Gravity and GraceIris Murdoch: The Sovereignty of GoodByung-Chul Han: The Burnout SocietyMichel Foucault: Discipline and Punish To democratize attention is to remake the conditions under which care becomes possible. #AttentionalPolitics #MoralPerception #DemocracyOfCare #SimoneWeil #IrisMurdoch #HannahArendt #PublicPhilosophy #VisibilityEthics #PhilosophyOfAttention #AttentionalDesign #CivicLife #PerceptualSolidarity #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Foucault #Han #SlowEthics #DigitalGovernance #EthicsOfPerception
No reviews yet