Mercy (2026) Movie Review & Ending Explained: Why You Should Skip the Theater
Failed to add items
Add to cart failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
Written by:
About this listen
Is Chris Pratt's new sci-fi thriller Mercy a groundbreaking look at AI justice, or just a high-budget seat filler? Today we’re breaking down the Mercy (2026) ending, the "90-minute" real-time gimmick, and why this $60 million production feels like a total bait-and-switch.
In this episode, we discuss:
The $60 Million Disappointment: Why the film's massive budget didn't translate into quality.
Chris Pratt Underutilized: Critiquing the decision to keep an action star in a chair for most of the film.
The AI Judge Paradox: Exploring the reliability of technology in the judicial system.
Logic Failures: Deep-diving into the plot holes and lazy execution that make this a "wait for streaming" release.
Takeaways from the Bench:
The film is criticized for a total lack of originality.
The plot contains significant holes and lacks clarity.
Verdict: One of the worst movies of the year—save your money and wait for the Prime Video release.
Mercy movie review, Chris Pratt, AI, sci-fi thriller, cinema, streaming, film critique, Mercy ending explained, Hollywood