An excessive number of questions can turn “reporting” into a full-time job. So what happens when an industry decides to cut the noise and keep only what actually drives improvement? Sarah Muirhead sits down with Kristi Block, lead for the Meat Institute’s reporting strategy, to unpack the newly updated Meat Institute Reporting framework and what it means for packers, processors, and the wider meat and poultry supply chain.

We walk through how the framework started as a proactive way to gather credible, sector-wide data on priorities like animal welfare, food safety, worker safety, environmental performance, and sustainability. Block explains why the framework was refreshed for 2026 and how the updated approach reduces complexity by shrinking the survey from roughly 500 questions to about 50 while still meeting customer and stakeholder expectations for consistent, comparable data. A big theme is flexibility: reporting is voluntary, and companies can start where they are strongest, then expand as capacity grows.

The conversation gets especially practical on sustainability reporting and ESG metrics, including greenhouse gas accounting, the GHG Protocol, and the pace of change around science-based targets. We also cover what participating companies get back, including establishment-level data that rolls up into a dashboard view across facilities, plus options for audit uploads and verification steps designed to support trust without creating extra chaos. Finally, they look ahead to the long game: tracking trends over time and aligning progress toward 2030 targets alongside initiatives like the US Roundtable for Sustainable Beef and the US Roundtable for Sustainable Poultry and Egg.

Subscribe, share this with someone managing supplier questionnaires, and leave a review if you want more clear, grounded conversations on the biggest issues in animal agriculture.