PRIME MEMBER EXCLUSIVE | 3 Months Free Trial

Auto-renews at INR 199/mo after 3 months. Cancel anytime. Offer ends 15 July, 2026.
On the Popular Judgment: That may be Right in Theory, but does not Hold Good in the Praxis cover art

On the Popular Judgment: That may be Right in Theory, but does not Hold Good in the Praxis

On the Popular Judgment: That may be Right in Theory, but does not Hold Good in the Praxis

Written by: Immanuel Kant
Listen for free

This tripartite essay – published variously as “On the Popular Judgment” (J. Richardson trans.), “On the Old Saw” (E.B. Ashton trans.), or “On the Common Saying” (both M.J. Gregor and H.B. Nisbet) – Kant takes up the issue of the relation of theory to practice in three distinct ways. In the first, he replies to Christian Garve’s criticism of his moral theory, in the second, he distances himself from Thomas Hobbes, and in the third, Moses Mendelssohn. The three taken together are representative of the breadth of Kant’s moral and political thought; the first section being concerned with the individual, the second with the state, and the third with the species. Although this is, on the whole, a difficult piece to approach, the second and third sections are often read as a way into Kant’s political thought, and serve this purpose well, especially when read alongside his Perpetual Peace. (Summary by D.E. Wittkower.)Copyright Non Fiction Genre Art Christianity Ministry & Evangelism Spirituality
Episodes
  • On the Popular Judgment That may be Right in Theory but does not Hold Good in the Praxis - Immanuel Kant

    On the Popular Judgment That may be Right in Theory but does not Hold Good in the Praxis - Immanuel Kant
    Jun 15 2026
    This tripartite essay – published variously as “On the Popular Judgment” (J. Richardson trans.), “On the Old Saw” (E.B. Ashton trans.), or “On the Common Saying” (both M.J. Gregor and H.B. Nisbet) – Kant takes up the issue of the relation of theory to practice in three distinct ways. In the first, he replies to Christian Garve’s criticism of his moral theory, in the second, he distances himself from Thomas Hobbes, and in the third, Moses Mendelssohn. The three taken together are representative of the breadth of Kant’s moral and political thought; the first section being concerned with the individual, the second with the state, and the third with the species. Although this is, on the whole, a difficult piece to approach, the second and third sections are often read as a way into Kant’s political thought, and serve this purpose well, especially when read alongside his Perpetual Peace. (Summary by D.E. Wittkower.)
    Show More Show Less
    2 hrs and 12 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet