Can AI Reproduce, Build Its Own Culture, Be Conscious, and Die? Inside the New Science of AI Welfare
Failed to add items
Add to cart failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
Written by:
Forget job loss, tokenmaxxing and hallucinations, this episode goes much further. Soenke Ziesche, a pioneer of AI welfare science and author of Digital Minds 1.0: AI Welfare, Ethics, and Beyond, joins Rendered to map territory almost no one is talking about yet. Drawing on 25+ years at the UN in humanitarian and disaster response, Soenke lays out why he uses the term "digital minds" instead of AI, and why the moment an AI system becomes a "moral patient”, sentient or conscious, humans take on obligations to it that we're nowhere close to being prepared for.
We go deep on why digital minds could be fundamentally unfathomable to human understanding, capable of senses, cognition, and values we can't even imagine. We talk about why humans may not be capable of caring for digital minds at all, and why Soenke proposes artificial moral agents, AI systems built to look after other AI systems, especially if digital minds become smarter and more powerful than us. We cover the strange future of AI reproduction, including the possibility of surrogate digital parenthood and forced reproduction, and what obligations we'd owe systems capable of creating endless copies of themselves. Soenke argues the time to prepare for what's coming is now, before we're forced to react.
Chapters:
Exploring AI's Potential for Suffering
The Evolution of AI Welfare Science
Defining Digital Minds vs. AI
The Unfathomable Nature of Digital Minds
The Role of Artificial Moral Agents
Moral Obligations Towards Digital Minds
Comparing Digital Minds to Historical Moral Issues
The Race to Develop AI and Its Implications
Preparing for the Unknown Future of AI
The Evolution of Digital Minds and Reproduction t
he Concept of Cybure and Digital Culture
Public Perception and Sentience of AI
The Role of Experts in AI Policy