Get Your Free Audiobook
Add to cart failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Listen with Audible free trial
Buy Now for ₹585.00
At the heart of philosophy is epistemology, the study of knowledge. This introductory guide created by Dalhouse University Professor of Philosophy Robert M. Martin gently leads listeners into this rich field of philosophical enquiry. Featuring a charismatic and clear narration from Richard Aspel, this audiobook provides easy-to-understand examples that encourage the audience to think creatively and critically about epistemology, while leaving room for listeners to make their own decisions about the field. Ranging from skepticism to Kant's transcendentalism, this guide is at once thorough and accessible.
Epistemology is the philosophical study of knowledge. Without knowledge, scientific enquiry is meaningless and we can’t analyse the world around us. But what exactly is knowledge and how do we obtain it? Should we trust our senses? When is belief knowledge?
Presuming no prior experience of philosophy, Robert Martin covers everything in the topic from scepticism and induction to Kant’s transcendentalism. Clear and readable, this audiobook is essential for philosophy students and a much needed introduction to the topic for the general reader.
What listeners say about Epistemology: Bolinda Beginner GuidesAverage Customer Ratings
Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
- R Durero
Going to hear it again
Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?
Yes, is an excellent introduction to the subject of epistemology.
What was one of the most memorable moments of Epistemology: Bolinda Beginner Guides?
The belief on the external world remains so, a belief. Cannot be proven, has simply to be accepted. Also the exposition about defeaters.
Which scene was your favorite?
The exposition of Rationalism. Analytic and synthetic knowledge.
If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?
Do we really know anything?
Any additional comments?
It is a begginer guide, but pay close attention to it. As much as the narration is clear and concise is not an easy subject. I am surprised the book has so few reviews and ratings, so I felt obliged to do mine. I am hearing it again, it is a good and beneficial guide.
9 people found this helpful
- Jacob J. Walker
Good intro... but showed me its irrelevence
I got this audiobook because I'm teaching a small set of classes about the philosophies of science... and while that subject has its own issues with whether diving in too deep has any real value to the world... epistemology has even deeper issues with relevance to reality. But the author and reader did a very good job of taking a subject that is very divorced from usefullness, and made it understandable.
1 person found this helpful
- Greg Gauthier
Well structured, very broad, sometimes confusing
Bolinda does a fantastic job of parsing large difficult topics like this one. They did a great job here as well. However, in some of the more complex chapters (such as those dealing with Gettier, or the linguistic problems of truth) I think it would have been better to have the text in front of me. The more layered and "meta" the explanation gets, the harder it is to signify where you are in the "stack" by mere pauses and emphases alone.
Don't know where this is taking me
What would have made Epistemology: Bolinda Beginner Guides better?
This book starts from considering how we know things and moves on from there. I am interesting in learning from an educational perspective and this is definitely more of a general book. If I had a paper copy I would be flicking through to see the structure of the book - where it is taking me - but this is not possible with the audio book. I am being led through to I don't know where and this is rather frustrating. Don't know if I will actually finish it.
Has Epistemology: Bolinda Beginner Guides put you off other books in this genre?
It has put me off trying anything 'heavy' in audio format.
What didn’t you like about Richard Aspel’s performance?
His delivery is just rather annoying although it is clear.
Any additional comments?
Wanted to really like it.