An important discussion expertly narrated

When the average American encounters discussion of democracy, it's usually in two broad categories:
A. The unquestioning loyalty to the ideal, in relation to the terrible historical alternatives, like absolute monarchy, fascism, and communism.
B. The attack on the goodness of democracy from people who are loyal to those terrible historical alternatives.

It's rare for a person to encounter not only something that says that liberal democracy is good, but to go in detail as to WHY specifically it is good on its own, not just as the best of a series of bad choices, as in the famous quote of "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others" which is commonly attributed to Winston Churchill but never directly attributed.

With a 15 hour audio book, the central tenet of Fukuyama's argument seems to be this: The human soul is made of three parts, reason, desire, and thymos, Greek for "spiritedness." Liberal democracy is the best way to satisfy all three parts of the soul, and resolves important contradictions that were part of all previous systems of government. Liberal democracy does itself have its own contradictions, but these are minor ones that are problematic in the manner of the degrees in which competing but opposing desires are dealt with, namely Megalothymia and Isothymia, as well as the related balance between liberty and equality, but these are less important than the fundamental contradictions in the relationship of lordship and bondage that characterized historical political systems.

To listen to this book, you don't need to agree with every sentence. In fact, Francis Fukuyama has this odd habit of going into such lengths of explaining contradicting points of view that it becomes very difficult in places to understand whether he's explaining someone else's point of view or explaining his own. But the underlying tenets of his arguments are solid, and his views are well-developed, clearly explained, and amply provided with real world evidence, such that this is not a book that can be ignored. Further, to my view, I do not believe that this is a book that has any logical bounds for a person to dismiss outright after reading in its entirety. Specific parts of the book can and have been criticized on many levels, but the central ideas are too well developed and too well furnished with real world evidence for anyone to have any grounds to disagree with them.

One last comment: L. J. Ganser's narration is great for this, and he deserves real recognition for his reading of the book. Audio quality was perfect, and the entire thing has the loud, clear volume of a professional sound studio. But what really sets it apart is L. J. Ganser's consistent emotional delivery of the entire story. This is, in many senses, a book of philosophy, which in many cases tend to be the most dense texts and most apt to ramble on and lose the reader. While Francis Fukuyama certainly deserves some of the credit for making a book that is both cerebral and accessible, L. J. Ganser needs credit for reading the book, not like a stuffy professor trying to teach a bored class important information, but like a storyteller at a campfire, speaking passionately about a subject that is both important to humanity, and a story that is fun to listen to. In a 15 hour story, never once in the entire thing did I feel like he was droning on, nor did I ever feel that L. J. Ganser was getting tired of reading the story out loud or that his passion and zeal were waning. It's one thing to read an adventure story with passion and interest. It's another feat entirely to read a book of philosophy such that the listeners of the book don't get bored. L. J. Ganser's reading was so passionate and exciting that there were times when I pulled my car into my driveway that I left the audio book running for a few minutes because I was enjoying listening to him so much. He truly deserves five stars for his performance of this book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

12 people found this helpful

if you haven't read Fukuyama, you are missing out

It took me many years to actually read (listen to) this book, but it is (despite the fact that some of its arguments are aging and some are flawed) brilliant and profound. The End of History and the Last Man.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

10 people found this helpful

Only a RAND analyst could come up with this

One of the most ridiculous analyses I have ever read/Audibled. Why does it still have any traction?

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful

Highly recommend for all social change agents.

this awesome audiobook casts light on how Humanity has achieved its current position and how we might consider making a future that is life serving.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

Disappointing, yet thought-provoking

So this was not at all what I had expected. What I expected was an intellectual foundation for the post Cold War neoliberal world order, and while the book does attempt at that, the way Fukuyama goes about it is truly bizarre. Instead of tackling great political science thinkers of the 20th century or taking a bird's eye view of the 90s geopolitics Fukuyama goes the route of arguing for the hegelian master-slave dialectic peppered with Plato's definition of human spirit. Some of his takes seem like biased foregone conclusions, such as his critique of Marx's materialist variant of Hegel's dialectic, which Fukuyama dismisses seemingly arbitrarily, establishing a simplistic chicken-or-egg dichotomy and then simply asserting it is not economic conditions but the elites' will to power that drives history, as if these things could be neatly separated. This is just a microcosm of Fukuyama's style of argumentation, not my primary criticism of the book.

Fukuyama tries to address and downplay some apparent contradictions of liberal democracy such as income inequality, wealth of nations and American race relations for example, but his takes on those are embarrassingly superficial, even low-key racist at times - apparently generational wealth on both national and individual level is all about culture and lack of work ethic.

I honestly expected more from a book with as much name recognition as this one. Its saving grace is that at least the title is click-bait before click-bait - he does NOT, in fact, claim that human history in hegelian sense has reached its endpoint. I give the book two stars, because although I found the book pretty annoying and off-base, it did force me to actually think about why I felt that way. And that's what reading books is all about, isn't it?

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Good sound and good author

The author is not ‘monotonic’ reader! You feel that IN this ‘movie’ and that is a big pros in this audio book. Sure fascinating

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Brilliant guy

Great scholar. Very well written book. Very complex and well organized. Will read more of his books.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

End of end of history

Well argued book that, even though has lost its predictive power somewhat, still provides the necessary mental tools for the political and philosophical analysis of the current state of affairs in the world.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

neoliberal nonsense

Hairbrained. Malcolm gladwell does less cherry picking and he may as well be a Cherry farmer.

complete revisionism and a denial of the reality at the time of the collapse of the the Soviet union. uses a false example to based his entire premise on.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Brilliant in scope and analysis

Fukuyama presents his thesis in clear, bold terms. This volume is brilliant in scope and analysis. It is thought provoking, compelling, intensely interesting, impactfully memorable. Gander’s narration is clear and fosters comprehension. One may be incentivized to reread this book due to the density of Fukuyama’s arguments.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!