First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 6 Mar 2026.
If government policy can accelerate startup formation… what actually determines which companies survive?

In this episode of A Reasonable Rant, Neo examines the gap between what innovation policy is designed to produce and what it actually delivers in practice. Drawing on a China-focused dataset of over 1,000 startups and 300+ investors, the episode breaks down how coordinated policy, capital, and industry can generate massive startup activity while leaving conversion to durable businesses uneven and delayed.

This isn’t a critique of policy effectiveness. It’s a closer look at system design. Why formation is easy to measure, why conversion is not, and how capital, incentives, and competition shift pressure later in the lifecycle. Because once you understand where that pressure actually sits, the question changes.

Not how much innovation is being created… but what kind of outcomes the system is built to produce.

First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 26 Feb 2026.
In Episode 15, Neo examines valuation not as a financial output, but as a behavioural system that shaped venture capital decisions between 2020 and 2025. Drawing on over 28,000 global funding events and a focused analysis of Asian markets, the episode unpacks how valuation drifted from an analytical tool into a negotiated signal. As traditional methods like discounted cash flow and comparables break down in early-stage environments, a simpler mechanism quietly takes over. Ownership becomes arithmetic, and arithmetic becomes value.

As the cycle unfolds, the consequences become harder to ignore. Inflated starting points create expectations most companies cannot sustain, while capital concentration at the top distorts the perception of recovery for everyone else. What looks like progress in aggregate often hides fragility at the company level, where time between rounds lengthens, valuation step-ups shrink, and the next milestone becomes harder to reach.

This episode reframes valuation entirely. Not as a verdict on what a company is worth, but as a commitment that shapes what it must become. Because once the number is set, it doesn’t just reflect reality. It starts to define it.

First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 19 Feb 2026.
In this episode, Neo examines the venture studio model beyond its surface appeal. Drawing on a dataset of 406 studios and 1,843 startups across 45 countries, the analysis moves past portfolio optics to interrogate the system itself. Venture studios are designed to remove early-stage friction, accelerate launch, and improve survival rates. And on those terms, they work. But the data reveals a quieter tension: efficiency at the start does not translate into durability over time.

As the episode unfolds, a pattern emerges. Success is highly concentrated, transition from studio to independent company remains fragile, and capital continues to follow the same power law seen in traditional venture. The issue is not that studios fail to create companies, but that they are optimised for beginnings rather than continuity. What looks like progress at the portfolio level often masks a deeper structural gap at the system level.

This episode reframes the venture studio conversation entirely. Not as a question of whether the model works, but what it is actually designed to do and where that design stops. Because once you separate survival from endurance, the real question becomes unavoidable: are we building companies, or simply building more efficient ways to start them?