In Episode 33 of The Audio Files, Brad Zerbo and Jaytriot return for Part II of their Valentine’s Day deep dive, escalating the conversation into what they call “The Reckoning.” The episode continues unpacking the symbolism, history, and darker undertones surrounding the holiday, examining its origins, ritual elements, and the cultural forces that shaped its evolution.

Brad and Jaytriot revisit themes introduced in Part I, layering in additional historical references, esoteric connections, and institutional influences that they argue transformed a romantic observance into something far more complex. The discussion explores power structures, religious overlays, and the blending of ancient tradition with modern consumer culture.

Throughout the episode, the hosts balance research with candid commentary, challenging listeners to question the narratives embedded in familiar celebrations. “The Reckoning” frames Valentine’s Day not simply as a date on the calendar, but as a lens into how history, myth, and influence operate beneath the surface of mainstream culture.

chaos, and at least three simultaneous hot takes per minute. The crew kicks things off with reactions to the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling, unpacking what it means for executive power, trade policy, and whether this was a legal gut punch or just a strategic detour.

From there, it’s off to the races: trade war theatrics, media spin cycles, economic ripple effects, and the eternal question of who actually holds the levers of power. The conversation swerves into election integrity debates, voter ID battles, and institutional trust — with each host bringing their own flavor of skepticism, sarcasm, and semi-therapeutic venting.

It’s part constitutional analysis, part group chat meltdown, and part “are we living in a simulation?” Ep. 45 delivers the signature OnlyLands formula: serious topics, unserious delivery, and a roundtable that feels like Thanksgiving dinner — if everyone read the Federalist Papers before dessert.

In Episode 155 of Spellbreakers, Matt Trump explores the timeline and unanswered questions surrounding Sarah Ferguson’s reported connections and movements on September 11, 2001. The episode walks through documented accounts, public statements, and associations that place Ferguson in proximity to key figures and locations during the events of that day.

Matt analyzes the significance of her whereabouts, relationships, and subsequent media coverage, questioning how certain narratives were framed and why some details have received little scrutiny. He revisits overlapping connections to financial institutions, political figures, and transatlantic networks that appear repeatedly in broader 9/11 discussions.

The episode focuses on piecing together timelines, examining publicly available records, and identifying gaps between official explanations and reported activity. Through careful breakdown and contextual analysis, Matt raises questions about influence, access, and information flow in the hours and aftermath of 9/11, inviting viewers to reexamine a rarely discussed thread in the larger story.

In Episode 163 of Why We Vote, CannCon and Ashe in America break down the SAVE Act and the broader debate over voter ID, proof of citizenship, and structural election reform. They examine what the legislation proposes, where enforcement challenges exist, and whether incremental fixes are enough to restore public confidence in the system.

The episode also covers the Supreme Court’s ruling limiting the use of IEEPA tariff authority, exploring what the decision means for executive power and how judicial constraints intersect with broader institutional accountability. The hosts discuss the balance between Congress and the presidency, questioning how legal boundaries shape political strategy.

Throughout the conversation, CannCon and Ashe emphasize the importance of paper ballots, chain of custody, and transparent voter registration systems. They challenge surface-level reforms and encourage viewers to focus on procedural safeguards rather than partisan framing. Ep. 163 ties legislative action, judicial rulings, and election mechanics into a wider discussion about restoring trust in American governance.

In this February 20 episode of MAHA News, Jordan Sather and Nate Prince break down the controversy surrounding the new executive order addressing glyphosate and elemental phosphorus under the Defense Production Act. They examine claims about immunity for Bayer, clarify what the order actually does, and discuss why glyphosate has become so embedded in the U.S. food system that an immediate ban could devastate farmers and spike food prices. The hosts reference Sri Lanka’s failed nationwide organic experiment, RFK Jr.’s comments calling America’s food system “chemical warfare,” and the broader tension between reform and food security.

They also expose the flaws in the GRAS system, which allows food companies to self-certify ingredients as safe, and highlight alarming obesity and malnutrition trends in the U.S. Finally, they address the rapidly aging farmer population, rising farm bankruptcies, and structural issues making agriculture less viable for the next generation.

In Episode 86 of Geopolitics with Ghost, Ghost breaks down escalating tensions in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, focusing on renewed Iran negotiations, Israeli pressure campaigns, and the risk of broader regional conflict. He analyzes statements from U.S. officials, Iranian leadership, and Israeli sources regarding enrichment limits, verification demands, and military posturing.

The episode explores Russia’s evolving position, including warnings against Western escalation and NATO expansion, while examining how energy corridors, sanctions, and military alliances are reshaping global alignments. Ghost connects developments in Ukraine, joint military exercises, and diplomatic maneuvering to what he describes as a widening strategic fracture inside NATO.

He also addresses shifting rhetoric from Western leaders, the economic implications of prolonged conflict, and the role of media framing in shaping public consent. Throughout the show, Ghost emphasizes understanding motive, leverage, and timing rather than reacting to surface headlines, urging viewers to track power blocs and strategic interests as the geopolitical chessboard continues to shift.

In this Badlands Media Special Coverage, President Trump delivers a forceful response to the Supreme Court’s decision limiting the use of IEEPA tariffs. Calling the ruling “deeply disappointing,” he criticizes certain justices while praising the dissents of Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh.

Trump argues that the decision does not eliminate tariffs, but instead clarifies and strengthens alternative authorities under existing statutes, including Sections 232, 301, and 122. He announces an immediate 10 percent global tariff under Section 122, maintains existing national security and Section 301 tariffs, and signals additional investigations to address unfair trade practices.

Throughout the press conference, he ties tariffs to economic growth, record stock market performance, reduced fentanyl trafficking, revived domestic manufacturing, and international negotiations, including India and Pakistan. Emphasizing “certainty” and expanded presidential authority, Trump frames the ruling not as a setback, but as an opportunity to implement even stronger trade measures going forward.

Jon Herold reacts live to the Supreme Court’s ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize broad presidential tariffs. Surprised by the decision but not shaken, Jon walks through the Court’s reasoning, the dissents from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, and what the ruling actually changes.

President Trump responds immediately in a fiery press conference, criticizing the Court, suggesting foreign influence, and announcing alternative tariff measures under other statutory authorities. Jon breaks down Trump’s pivot to new tariff tools, the immediate 10 percent global tariff announcement, and the broader implications for trade, Congress, and executive power.

From questions about refunding tariff revenue to claims of economic certainty and national security authority, this episode captures the political, legal, and economic stakes in real time — along with Jon’s unfiltered commentary.