This video evaluates progressive policy across the United States by creating the first ever Green New Deal Index, a framework that ranks all 50 states based on how closely their actual policies align with progressive goals.

The conversation walks through the methodology behind the index, explains how states are grouped into performance tiers, and introduces a “hypocrisy index” that exposes gaps between political rhetoric and real-world policy outcomes.

Along the way, it challenges common assumptions, revealing that some traditionally conservative or “red” states are quietly outperforming expectations, while many self-identified progressive states struggle to fully live up to their messaging. Beyond rankings, the discussion explores why successful policies are often poorly communicated, why nuance matters when assessing public policy, and how patience is essential when evaluating long-term systemic change. The video closes with a call to better recognize incremental progress and to have more honest, data-driven conversations about what is actually working at the state level.

Takeaways

The Green New Deal Index ranks states based on their adherence to progressive policies.

Methodology is crucial for understanding the rankings and can be debated.

States are categorized into tiers based on their performance in various criteria.

The analysis reveals surprising insights about states traditionally viewed as conservative.

The hypocrisy index highlights discrepancies between states' political rhetoric and actual policies.

Some states perform well despite being labeled as conservative or red states.

Democratic states often struggle to align their policies with their progressive rhetoric.

The importance of recognizing states that are making significant progress in environmental policies.

The need for better communication and promotion of successful state policies.

A call for patience and acknowledgment of gradual progress in public policy.

0:00 Introduction to Green New Deal Index

4:17 Methodology: Creating the Green New Deal Index

10:04 Alabama & Green New Deal

11:09 Alaska & Green New Deal

12:05 Arizona & Green New Deal

13:00 Arkansas & Green New Deal

13:40 California & Green New Deal

14:38 Colorado & Green New Deal

15:30 Connecticut & Green New Deal

15:17 Delaware & Green New Deal

17:03 Florida & Green New Deal

17:56 Georgia & Green New Deal

18:44 Hawaii & Green New Deal

19:50 Idaho & Green New Deal

20:47 Illinois & Green New Deal

21:48 Indiana & Green New Deal

22:40 Iowa & Green New Deal

23:36 Kansas & Green New Deal

24:16 Kentucky & Green New Deal

25:34 Louisiana & Green New Deal

26:46 Maine & Green New Deal

27:44 Maryland & Green New Deal

28:34 Massachusetts & Green New Deal

29:27 Michigan & Green New Deal

30:14 Minnesota & Green New Deal

31:07 Mississippi & Green New Deal

32:44 Missouri & Green New Deal

33:47 Montana & Green New Deal

35:15 Nebraska & Green New Deal

36:14 Nevada & Green New Deal

37:10 New Hampshire & Green New Deal

37:55 New Jersey & Green New Deal

39:20 New Mexico & Green New Deal

40:15 New York & Green New Deal

41:25 North Carolina & Green New Deal

42:11 North Dakota & Green New Deal

43:06 Ohio & Green New Deal

44:04 Oklahoma & Green New Deal

45:10 Oregon & Green New Deal

45:53 Pennsylvania & Green New Deal

47:37 Rhode Island & Green New Deal

48:23 South Carolina & Green New Deal

49:19 South Dakota & Green New Deal

50:46 Tennessee & Green New Deal

51:34 Texas & Green New Deal

52:40 Utah & Green New Deal

54:20 Vermont & Green New Deal

55:21 Virginia & Green New Deal

56:18 Washington & Green New Deal

57:44 West Virginia & Green New Deal

58:44 Wisconsin & Green New Deal

59:36 Wyoming & Green New Deal

1:00:29 Overview of State Rankings

1:02:07 State Hypocrisy Index

1:11:27 Takeaways From Analysis

1:13:58 Progress Takes A Long Times

1:14:50 Democrats Need To Promote Wins

1:16:06 Democrats Are Hypocrites

1:17:34 Things Are Going OK!

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

This conversation examines the dynamics of fundamentalism and extremism, focusing on the underlying human values that drive these behaviors. It reflects on recent mass shootings at Bondi Beach and Brown University, the emotional impact of such events, and the broader societal response to violence. The discussion then shifts toward an exploration of human motivation, with particular attention to conservative value systems and their potential connection to acts of violence. Emphasis is placed on the roles of fear, belonging, and cult-like dynamics in the formation and reinforcement of extremist ideologies, as well as the complexities of religious fundamentalism and the importance of healthy individualism as a counterbalance.

The conversation also explores the tension between individualism and social connection, engaging with philosophical questions related to faith, morality, and divine inspiration. Drawing on Kierkegaard’s concepts of the Knight of Faith and the Tragic Hero, it examines how personal intent shapes moral action. The dialogue extends into reflections on the nature of existence, including considerations of the quantum realm and the transformative potential of divine insight. Ultimately, the discussion grapples with questions of intent, morality, and the individual’s role within the collective, inviting listeners to reflect on their inner voices and the broader implications of personal action.

Takeaways

Sandy Hook marked a turning point in the perception of societal responses to violence.

Conservative values can manifest in both political and social contexts, often leading to a desire for maintenance over change.

Fear is a significant motivator behind many conservative values and extremist behaviors.

Belonging to a group can lead individuals to conform to harmful ideologies.

Cults often thrive on isolation, compliance, and a disconnection from individual instincts.

The dynamics of us versus them can lead to dehumanization and increased violence.

Religious fundamentalism shares characteristics with cult behavior, often leading to extreme actions.

Healthy individualism can serve as a counterbalance to cult-like group dynamics.

The political landscape is increasingly characterized by a conservative approach on both sides of the spectrum.

Healthy individualism is essential for personal growth. Diversifying social connections prevents over-reliance on one group.

The Knight of Faith must be willing to sacrifice everything. Kierkegaard's dilemma raises questions about faith and morality.

Divine inspiration can lead to transformative actions.

Intent plays a crucial role in determining moral actions.

We are constantly encoding information in the universe.

Personal experiences can lead to profound insights.

The complexity of morality challenges simplistic judgments.

Seasonal changes can inspire introspection and connection.

Chapters

00:00 Fundamentalism and Extremism

9:59 Shalom Schwartz's Theory Of Motivation

22:50 Conservatism and Violence

33:15 How Culture Fosters Extremism

40:12 The WeWork Experiment: Social Control Mechanism

42:34 Fear and Political Ideology

46:02 Compassion in Political Discourse

48:52 Fragile Relationships & Political Divides

51:56 Online Cultures Create Modern Extremism

54:20 The Danger of Pushing Extremism Underground

56:46 Fundamentalism Across Religions

01:00:13 The Balance Between Individualism and Collectivism

01:08:32 The Knight of Faith vs. The Tragic Hero

01:14:00 Divine Inspiration and Creative Flow

01:16:04 The Power of Active Meditation

01:18:14 Listening to the Inner Voice

01:20:34 The Dilemma of Moral Choices

01:23:22 Intent and Individuality

01:26:45 Good and Evil

01:29:02 Divine Action

01:33:05 Connecting With Nature

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

We explore the pervasive influence of advertising and the rise of techno-feudalism, where tech companies dominate our lives. We discuss the implications of monopolistic practices in business, the role of big data in price discrimination, and the emotional manipulation inherent in social media. We emphasize the need for regulation, civic engagement, and personal agency in navigating this new landscape, advocating for a mindful approach to technology and community involvement.

Takeaways

Tech companies are increasingly controlling our lives.

Advertising is pervasive in every aspect of our daily routines.

The goal of businesses is to become monopolies.

Price discrimination is facilitated by big data.

Regulation is necessary to balance power in society.

Social media serves as a form of social proof.

Techno-feudalism represents a new social hierarchy.

The early internet promised freedom but has become controlled.

AI content creation is changing the landscape of SEO.

Civic institutions are essential for a healthy democracy.

Chapters

00:00 - 05:14 The Rise of Techno-Feudalism

05:14 - 11:00 The Monopoly Game

11:00 - 16:29 The Role of Regulation

16:29 - 21:30 The Necessity of Social Proof

21:30 - 26:39 The Consolidation of Digital Space

26:39 - 29:40 The Pay-to-Play Model

29:40 - 34:20 The Emotional Manipulation of Tech Platforms

34:20 - 40:07 Strategies for Navigating Social Media

40:07 - 47:04 The Buddha in the Marketplace

47:04 - 55:43 Owning Our Freedom

55:43 - 1:00:27 A New Merchant Class for Civic Engagement

This podcast is powered by Pinecast.