In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the HIPAA series with a focused look at the HIPAA Security Rule and what it actually requires in practice.

The Security Rule governs how electronic protected health information (ePHI) must be safeguarded through administrative, physical, and technical controls. Rather than prescribing specific tools, HIPAA requires organizations to assess risk, implement reasonable and appropriate safeguards, and continuously review how systems protect sensitive health data.

This episode explains how the Security Rule functions as a feedback loop between risk, safeguards, and system behavior, and why flexibility in implementation does not mean flexibility in responsibility.

If you work with healthcare systems, data, or compliance, this short episode clarifies what the Security Rule is really asking and why consistent protection matters more than perfect controls.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the HIPAA series by focusing on the HIPAA Privacy Rule and one of its most important principles: minimum necessary.

The Privacy Rule governs how protected health information (PHI) may be used and disclosed, but its real operational impact lies in how organizations limit access to PHI, even when use is permitted. This episode explains what “minimum necessary” means in practice, when it applies, and why it turns everyday access decisions into compliance decisions.

We explore how minimum necessary is enforced through system design rather than intent, why overly broad access represents a compliance risk even without a breach, and how regulators evaluate whether organizations are truly limiting exposure to PHI.

If you build, operate, or oversee systems that handle health information, this conversation clarifies how the Privacy Rule shapes access, workflows, and accountability across healthcare environments.

In this special episode of Compliance Technologies, we announce the launch of the Compliance Signal Enumeration (CSE) Registry, a public, open-source infrastructure for defining and referencing compliance signals.

Modern compliance frameworks increasingly rely on automation, tooling, and continuous evidence collection, yet the industry lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what is actually being measured. Without a canonical way to reference compliance signals, evidence becomes ambiguous, integrations become brittle, and trust degrades across tools, vendors, and audits.

The CSE Registry addresses this gap by providing a framework-agnostic, machine-readable, and human-auditable registry of compliance signals. It is designed to support compliance platforms, security tools, evidence pipelines, and audit workflows by offering a stable reference point for observable, reproducible, and verifiable compliance facts.

This episode explains why the registry exists, how it is intended to be used, and why treating compliance as infrastructure, rather than documentation, is essential for the future of continuous and provable compliance.

The CSE Registry is publicly available at cseregistry.org, with the open-source repository hosted on GitHub.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we begin a new series on HIPAA by clarifying what the law actually regulates and what it does not.

HIPAA is often described as a privacy law, but at its core it defines responsibility for how protected health information (PHI) is created, used, stored, and transmitted across systems and organizations. This episode explains who HIPAA applies to, what qualifies as PHI and ePHI, and why accountability sits at the center of the regulation.

We explore how HIPAA assigns obligations to covered entities and business associates, why health data naturally flows across modern systems, and how HIPAA’s structure assumes continuous risk assessment rather than one-time compliance.

If you build, operate, or oversee systems that handle health information, this episode sets the foundation for understanding HIPAA as an operating framework, not a checklist, and why responsibility, not technology, is the starting point.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we conclude the ISO twenty-seven thousand one series by stepping back and viewing the standard as a whole, not as a certification exercise, but as an operating system for trust.

After exploring context, risk, control selection, and day-to-day operation of the Information Security Management System (ISMS), this episode explains how ISO/IEC 27001 is designed to help organizations make consistent security decisions over time, even as systems, people, and threats change.

We discuss why certification is only a point-in-time validation, how the ISMS enables continuity and accountability, and why organizations that truly internalize ISO 27001 shift from “passing audits” to sustaining trust through structured governance and continual improvement.

If you build, operate, or oversee an ISMS, this episode brings the series together by showing how ISO 27001 functions not as a checklist, but as a durable framework for managing information security at scale.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the ISO twenty-seven thousand one series by focusing on what happens after design and planning: operating the Information Security Management System (ISMS).

ISO/IEC 27001 requires more than documented policies and selected controls. It expects the ISMS to function as a living system, supported by competent people, accurate documentation, monitored performance, internal audits, and active management oversight. This episode explores how Clauses 7 through 10 translate risk treatment decisions into daily operations.

We discuss the roles of competence and awareness, the importance of execution and monitoring, and why internal audit and management review are central to accountability and improvement. Rather than treating these activities as audit preparation, the episode frames them as mechanisms that keep the ISMS effective over time.

If you build, operate, or oversee an ISMS, this conversation clarifies what ISO 27001 expects once controls are in place and why operating the system well is what ultimately sustains trust.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the ISO twenty-seven thousand one series by focusing on risk treatment and the Statement of Applicability (SoA), two elements that sit at the core of a defensible Information Security Management System (ISMS).

ISO/IEC 27001 does not require organizations to eliminate all risk. It requires them to make explicit, justified decisions about how risks are treated and which controls are applied. This episode explains how risk treatment decisions are made, documented, and traced, and why the Statement of Applicability serves as the central record connecting risk assessment to control selection.

We discuss why every Annex A control must be addressed, how applicability is determined, and what auditors expect to see when they evaluate the logic and consistency of an SoA.

If you build, operate, or oversee an ISMS, this episode clarifies how ISO 27001 turns risk-based decisions into enforceable, reviewable practices and why this step often determines whether an ISMS stands up under audit.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the ISO twenty-seven thousand one series by examining where the standard truly begins: organizational context and risk and how those elements explain the role of Annex A.

ISO/IEC 27001 does not start with controls. It starts by requiring organizations to understand their context, define the scope of their Information Security Management System (ISMS), and assess risk in a way that reflects real business conditions. This episode explores how those early decisions shape everything that follows, including control selection.

We clarify why Annex A exists as a reference set of information security controls, how it supports risk treatment rather than dictating outcomes, and why justification through the Statement of Applicability is central to auditor expectations.

This conversation shows how ISO 27001 connects business context, risk-based decision-making, and enforceable controls into a coherent system and why that structure is what gives the standard its durability.

If you build, operate, or oversee an ISMS, this episode helps explain not just what Annex A is, but why it exists and how auditors expect it to be used.