EP 12 - How do we know the Gospels are reliable historical documents
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping basket is already at capacity.
Add to cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
Written by:
About this listen
“How do we know the Gospels are Reliable???”
Main Point: The Gospels (including Acts) are reliable, eye-witness accounts of actual events
Opening
- Are the Gospel accounts reliable? Are they true?
- WHEN were they written?
- WHO wrote them?
- Did the information change over time?
- We have to use what we know for sure about history to determine the validity of the Gospels
Main Points
- When were the Gospels written?
- The biggest historical event = Siege of Jerusalem 66-69AD, Temple Destruction 70AD
- Neither event is described in the Gospels or in any of Paul’s letters
- Paul was executed in Rome in 64AD, Peter in 65AD
- Luke wrote Acts after his Gospel - Acts didn’t mention Paul, Peter or James death 62AD
- So Acts was written before 62AD, and Luke’s Gospel was written PRIOR to that
- Paul quoted Luke’s Gospel in 1Tim 5:17/18 in around 63AD, as if it were common knowledge at that time (Luke 10:7)
- Paul quoted Luke’s Gospel again in 1 Corinthians 11:23-25 (Luke 22:19-20)
- So Luke’s Gospel had been around for a while at this time
- Luke quotes Mark and Matthew repeatedly in his Gospel (hundreds of times) which leads us to believe those Gospels pre-date Luke’s Gospel by a handful of years at least
- Matthew/Mark 45-50AD, Luke’s Gospel 50-53AD, Paul’s letters 53-57AD, Acts 57-60AD, John 85-95AD
- This early dating is crucial because it tells us that time for Legend to build was not enough and also passing on a tale/story like this during these times would have been impossible given the skeptical nature of people in this area during this time in history
- WHO wrote the Gospels?
- The Gospels were written anonymously, unlike Paul’s letters, which was normal/expected
- If the Authors were going to be “made up”, then why these guys?
- Did anyone else ever claim to be an Author of these writings?
- Why no author for Hebrews?
- Why say women saw the empty tomb? Why tell everyone what Jesus said on the Cross?
- Did the information change over time? (chain of custody)
- Significant number of copies helps us with this
- People did try to corrupt the scriptures but the fakes were easily caught throughout history
- Fortunately, the Gospel writers students left us more documents and evidence about how the information was passed down.
- John taught Ignatius and Polycarp – they taught Irenaeus who taught Hippolytus, all of whom left us corroborating evidence of the Gospel accounts and chain of custody
- Paul taught Linus and Clement of Rome – who taught Evaristus & Pius – Pius and Justin Martyr, Justin was the first Apologist who left us great works detailing the validity of the Gospels.
- Peter taught Mark, the first Gospel writer, who taught: Anianus, Avilius, Kedron, Primus and Justus. Justus taught Pantaenus who taught Clement of Alexandria who taught Origen who’s work was adopted by Pamphilus of Caesarea who taught Eusebius who lived to 339AD!
- This alone leads us right up to the Council of Laodacia
- The biggest historical event = Siege of Jerusalem 66-69AD, Temple Destruction 70AD
CONCLUSION:
- The Gospels, Acts & Paul’s letters were written early and are interwoven
- There is literally no reason to list the Gospel writers as such if they were not
- The teaching was passed down as carefully as it could have been, chain of custody is clean
- LETS PRAY----->>>>>>>
- Father, I pray for
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet