• ESG Investing in Commercial Real Estate
    Feb 13 2026

    This episode analyzes ESG in commercial real estate, finding that high ratings correlate with reduced risk and better operational efficiency. However, inconsistent rating systems and poor data transparency hinder climate action. Experts urge shifting to performance-based metrics.

    Reference

    Coakley, Daniel, ESG Investment in Commercial Real Estate -A Structured Literature Review (February 15, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4948030 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4948030

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Private Credit Today
    Feb 4 2026

    In this episode we discus a research paper provides a comprehensive survey of the private credit market, exploring its rapid expansion over the last fifteen years as a specialized alternative to traditional bank lending. Author Victoria Ivashina structures the analysis around three fundamental themes: the distinct economic function of non-bank debt, its potential macroeconomic and financial stability risks, and its performance as an investment asset class. A central premise of the work is that private credit is inextricably linked to the private equity industry, serving as a vital "one-stop" financing solution for middle-market buyouts that banks are often unable or unwilling to fund. While the author notes that current evidence suggests limited systemic risk to the banking sector, she highlights the need for further research into evolving underwriting standards and the impact of monetary policy on these opaque credit channels. Ultimately, the text serves to define the boundaries of this illiquid debt landscape, distinguishing modern direct lending from historical finance companies and broadly syndicated loan markets.

    Reference

    Ivashina, Victoria, Private Credit: What Do We Know? (October 30, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5683442 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5683442

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • Scaling Portfolio Optimization Beyond the 100-Qubit Frontier
    Jan 28 2026

    This episode explores utilizing the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) to address Dynamic Portfolio Optimization (DPO) at a scale exceeding 100 qubits. The authors of the paper discussed systematically evaluate the algorithm's performance on a real IBM Torino Quantum Processing Unit, scaling problem sizes from 6 to 112 qubits without applying error mitigation. They demonstrate that standard approaches often struggle with noise and circuit depth, prompting the development of a tailored ansatz and the use of a Differential Evolution classical optimizer. This hardware-aware strategy significantly reduces circuit depth and enhances the probability of finding optimal investment trajectories. Ultimately, the study proves that fine-tuned quantum algorithms can successfully navigate complex financial optimization landscapes within the utility frontier of modern quantum hardware.

    Reference

    Scaling the Variational Quantum Eigensolver for Dynamic Portfolio Optimization by Á. Nodar, I. De León, D. Arias, E. Mamedaliev, M. E. Molina, M. Mart́ın-Cordero, S. Hernández-Santana, P. Serrano, M. Arranz, O. Mentxaka, V. Garćıa, G. Carrascal, A. Retolaza, and I. Posadillo https://globaldatum.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/2412.19150v2-1.pdf

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • Quantum Logic in the Stock Market
    Jan 21 2026

    This episode examines the evolution of financial artificial intelligence from classical models toward a more sophisticated framework based on quantum logic. The authors of the paper we discuss argue that traditional AI often fails to capture human-centric decision-making, particularly the "bounded rationality" and non-linear expectations observed in real-world investors. By utilizing quantum machine learning and neural networks, these systems can better simulate human cognitive processes like superposition and interference, which represent the simultaneous presence of multiple conflicting expectations. The text demonstrates how quantum probability theory accounts for market anomalies and order effects that classical Bayesian logic cannot explain. Ultimately, the researchers advocate for quantum-driven techniques to improve the accuracy, speed, and explainability of AI in complex areas like algorithmic trading and risk management. This shift represents a transition toward human-like artificial intelligence capable of navigating the inherent uncertainty of global financial environments.

    Reference

    From Classical Rationality to Contextual Reasoning: Quantum Logic as a New Frontier for Human-Centric AI in Finance

    Fabio Bagarello, Francesco Gargano, Polina Khrennikova

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05475

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • PitchBook Analysis: Private Credit and Secondaries Market Trends
    Jan 15 2026

    PitchBook Analysis: Private Credit and Secondaries Market Trends

    In this episode we examine shifting trends within the private capital markets, specifically focusing on the rise and challenges of retail-oriented investment vehicles. One source details Blue Owl Capital’s decision to cancel a merger between two Business Development Companies following intense pressure from investors and the media regarding potential losses and halted redemptions. Simultaneously, the other source explores the growth of evergreen funds in the secondaries market, which aim to provide individual investors with greater liquidity and perpetual access to private equity. Together, the texts highlight how asset managers are navigating the complexities of opening traditionally institutional strategies to private wealth channels. However, this expansion brings significant regulatory burdens and market volatility that can complicate high-profile consolidations and fund structures. Progress in this sector relies on balancing the benefits of permanent capital against the risks inherent in providing flexible exit options for smaller investors.

    References

    “Blue Owl Terminates BDC Merger Amid Media, Investor Scrutiny,” PitchBook, Zack Miller, November 20, 2025.

    “How Evergreen Funds Are Taking Root in the Secondaries Market,” PitchBook, Emily Lai, October 28, 2024.

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • Scaling Conditional Autoencoders via Uncertainty-Aware Factor Selection
    Jan 7 2026

    The episode discusses one of the papers to be presented at the 9th Annual Data Science in Finance Conference by the Society of Quantitative Analysis (SQA) and the Chartered Financial Analysts (CFA) Society of New York on Thursday, January 8, 2026.

    This research paper introduces a scalable framework for financial portfolio management using high-dimensional Conditional Autoencoders (CAEs) to identify latent asset-pricing factors. While traditional methods often restrict the number of factors to prevent overfitting, this study utilizes up to 50 latent factors coupled with an uncertainty-aware selection process. By employing diverse forecasting models like ZS-Chronos and Q-Boost, the authors rank these factors based on their predictive stability and prune the less reliable ones. The findings demonstrate that selecting the most predictable subset significantly improves risk-adjusted returns, achieving high Sharpe and Sortino ratios. Ultimately, the study concludes that ensemble strategies combining these varied predictive signals offer superior, market-neutral performance even during volatile periods.

    Reference

    Ryan Engel, Yu Chen, Pawel Polak, and Ioana Boier. 2025. Scaling Conditional Autoencoders for Portfolio Optimization via Uncertainty-Aware Factor Selection. In 6th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance (ICAIF ’25), November15–18, 2025, Singapore, Singapore. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3768292.3770415

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    18 mins
  • Privacy Policy Shocks and the Erosion of Alternative Data Signals
    Jan 2 2026

    The episode discusses one of the papers to be presented at the 9th Annual Data Science in Finance Conference by the Society of Quantitative Analysis (SQA) and the Chartered Financial Analysts (CFA) Society of New York on Thursday, January 8, 2026.

    This research explores how Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) policy served as a privacy-driven shock that disrupted the alternative data landscape in financial markets. By restricting cross-app tracking, the policy degraded the quality of mobile traffic signals, which were previously used by investors to predict firm performance. The authors demonstrate that mutual funds and financial analysts who relied on this data experienced a significant decline in their trading edge and forecasting accuracy. Consequently, the market's ability to price stocks efficiently weakened, leading to increased information frictions and higher trading costs for affected companies. Ultimately, the study highlights the fragility of non-traditional data and warns that privacy regulations can have unintended "ripple effects" on global capital allocation.

    Reference

    Abis, Simona and Tang, Huan and Bian, Bo, Breaking the Data Chain: The Ripple Effect of Data Sharing Restrictions on Financial Markets (July 01, 2025). The Wharton School Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5334566 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5334566

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • AI, Opinion Ecosystems and Finance
    Dec 26 2025

    The episode discusses one of the papers to be presented at the 9th Annual Data Science in Finance Conference by the Society of Quantitative Analysis (SQA) and the Chartered Financial Analysts (CFA) Society of New York on Thursday, January 8, 2026.

    This research explores how Generative AI impacts financial markets by comparing its use on two distinct social media platforms: Seeking Alpha and Wall Street Bets. Using GPT Zero to detect AI-generated content, the authors find that a platform's governance and user demographics determine whether AI improves or harms information quality. On the curated Seeking Alpha, AI acts as a tool for information enhancement, helping sophisticated investors synthesize fundamental data and improve market efficiency. Conversely, on the unmoderated Wall Street Bets, AI is often used for information distortion, amplifying emotional narratives and speculative "lottery-like" trading behaviors. Ultimately, the study concludes that the technology's market impact is not inherent but is instead shaped by the institutional environment and community norms.

    Reference

    Hirshleifer, David and Peng, Lin and Wang, Qiguang and Zhang, Weicheng and Zhang, Xiaoyan, "AI, Opinion Ecosystems, and Finance" (July 01, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5452175

    Podcast Disclaimer

    This podcast is an independent production and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party entities unless explicitly stated. The content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or professional advice. Listeners should consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

    This episode is based on the reference(s) listed above and was generated using Notebook LM and potentially other AI tools. While I have reviewed the content for accuracy, it may still contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Neither the producers nor any affiliates accept liability for any damages or losses arising from the use or interpretation of this content.

    Show More Show Less
    14 mins