Send a text

What if silence isn’t agreement?

In this episode, we unpack how survival within institutions often requires a strategy people never see — monitoring tone, calculating risk, deciding when to speak and when not to.

Refusal doesn’t always look loud.
Sometimes it looks like protecting your energy, choosing restraint, and understanding how power actually moves inside systems.

This episode also asks a harder question: when institutions celebrate resilience, what conditions made that endurance necessary in the first place?

Because there’s a difference between surviving a system and being supported by it.

Support the show

Send a text

Part 3 of Fira's Thesis Series examines how the institution can appear supportive on paper but also quietly shifts responsibilities and instability onto Indigenous students. In this episode, we dive into how unclear policies, unequal access to power, and the concept of "self-advocacy" significantly affect the experiences of Indigenous graduate students. When harm is only acknowledged through written rules, daily instability can seem normal, leading to silence as a survival tactic. It raises an important question: if policies promise fairness, how do we reconcile that with the reality on the ground?

Support the show

Send a text

In Part 2 of the Thesis Series, we examine how institutional harm often shows up—not through overt discrimination, but through silence, shifting expectations, and assumed support that never fully materializes. This episode names the structures that place quiet, ongoing pressure on Indigenous scholars: unclear guidance, uneven power, emotional labor disguised as professionalism, and the expectation to endure harm without disruption. Rather than assigning blame, this conversation focuses on clarity—how systems function, who bears the cost of confusion, and why refusal can be an act of protection and survival. This episode sets the foundation for what comes next: turning survival into creation when institutions fail to hold us.

Support the show