LSAT 94 Logical Reasoning S2 Q4
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping basket is already at capacity.
Add to cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
LSAT 94 Logical Reasoning S2 Q4
-
Narrated by:
-
Written by:
About this listen
A No. The introductory claim states it would be a mistake to include it in the first sentence.
B No. Not a reason which is relevant or related to the evidence mentioned.
C No. It plays a conclusion, which needs to be supported by a premise.
D No. slightly an opinion but more considered as a conclusion, which needs to be supported by a premise.
E Yes. The conclusion is related to the argument of not meeting the demand for supply.
No reviews yet