Law & Behold cover art

Law & Behold

Law & Behold

Written by: Gaurav Pathak
Listen for free

About this listen

Presently on Hold. Law & Behold is a legal podcast presenting recent and interesting judgments from courts in India. Listen to a fascinating story of a case that has been decided by the Supreme Court of India or one of the High Courts. A primer on legal education, the podcast is presented in Hinglish, and is suited for everyone interested in learning the nuances of law. Show Notes contain case name, case number and citation.Gaurav Pathak Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Gaming: Regulation and Data Protection ft. Abhishek Malhotra
    Sep 20 2021

    In this Bonus Episode of Law and Behold, I interview Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Managing Partner of TMT Law Practice on different aspects of Gaming Laws. Tune in to discover the history of Gaming Laws, why Intellectual Property matters in Gaming, the role of data protection in Gaming and lots more.

    R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs The Union Of India: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/725224/

    Madras HC Judgment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V2i7MRord5ucSgsHhBkitNJe4X4CH_CV/view?usp=sharing

    Delhi HC Judgment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xv1HUE4HFUvp7vULVd0YosIbTeEpwfb_/view?usp=sharing

    India United States Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17MI7qV8LQpSXqqdKkUKTOVZhwIjEO986/view?usp=sharing

    Show More Show Less
    30 mins
  • Kidnapping for Ransom: 364A IPC
    Jul 11 2021

    Prateek Gupta, was a student in VIth standard in St. Mary’s High School, Rezimental Banzar, Secunderabad, Hyderabad was kidnapped on his way back home. The Police arrested the kidnapper named Sheik Ahmed, and he was convicted under Section 364A IPC by the Sessions Court. Ahmed’s appeal before High Court was dismissed, but the Supreme Court found in his favour. Tune in to know why!

    Cause Title: SHAIK AHMED VERSUS STATE OF TELANGANA LNIND 2021 SC 180

    Case Number: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.533 OF 2021

    Court: Supreme Court of India

    Citation: LNIND 2021 SC 180

    Instagram: lawandbehold

    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Reservation in Promotion
    Jul 4 2021

    Leesama Joseph was appointed in 1996 to the post of Typist/clerk in the Police Department on compassionate grounds, after her brother had passed away during service. She undisputedly suffered from Post Polio Residual Paralysis (L) Lower Limb and her permanent disability had been assessed at 55%. Leesama was promoted to the position of Upper Division Clerk and Cashier, but she initiated a litigation claiming that she was entitled to reservation in promotion on account of her disability, and therefore should get her benefits from a back date, i.e. the date she became entitled for promotion.


    The Kerala Administrative Tribunal declined her plea but the High Court decided in her favour.


    Tune is as we see how the Supreme Court interpreted Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. We also explore if a legislative provision can become a fetter for implementation of the same legislation? Why is it so difficult to bring about a societal change, and how should a statute be interpreted to give out its most comprehensive meaning.


    Cause Title: THE STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS VERSUS LEESAMMA JOSEPH

    Case Number: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2021

    Court: Supreme Court of India

    Citation: LNIND 2021 SC 181

    Instagram: lawandbehold


    Show More Show Less
    23 mins
No reviews yet