Leadership Limbo cover art

Leadership Limbo

Leadership Limbo

Written by: Josh Hugo and John Clark
Listen for free

Leadership is uncomfortable, especially when you’re responsible for results but don’t control everything.

Leadership Limbo is for developing managers and the leaders who support them. Each week, Josh Hugo and John Clark explore the human tensions leaders face: giving feedback, building accountability, navigating ambiguity, developing people, handling conflict, and leading without easy answers.

Through candid conversations, practical frameworks, and thoughtful guests, the show helps you build the self-awareness and influence needed to remain present when leadership gets uncomfortable.

If you’re learning to lead people, or responsible for helping managers grow, you’re in the right place.

Learn more:

John Clark, Best Days Consulting: https://www.bestdaysconsulting.org

Josh Hugo, PIQ Strategies: https://piqstrategies.com

Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
Economics Management Management & Leadership Self-Help Success
Episodes
  • Leadership Development: Why Self-Awareness Alone Won’t Change Your Behavior
    Aug 18 2026
    EPISODE OVERVIEW Most leaders say they value personal development, but how many can identify a leadership behavior they are actively changing? In this episode of Leadership Limbo, Josh Hugo and John Clark explore why leadership development often stops at insight. Reading books, listening to podcasts, completing assessments, and recognizing personal tendencies can increase self-awareness, but none of those activities necessarily produce behavior change. For managers, leadership growth becomes meaningful when it gets specific. When does an unhelpful tendency appear? What visible action follows? How does that behavior affect other people? What small action could produce a different result? Josh introduces the Know Yourself to Lead Yourself framework, a practical cycle connecting tendency, pattern, action, consequence, and reality. Using his own defensiveness as an example, Josh demonstrates how a familiar leadership tendency can produce two very different outcomes. When challenged, he can become reactive, overexplain, or ask questions designed to defend his position. Alternatively, he can pause, express genuine gratitude, and ask questions intended to understand the other person. The goal is not to erase personality or eliminate every natural tendency. It is to recognize when a tendency becomes visible through behavior and then practice a healthier response. Over time, small behavioral changes can create stronger relationships, more honest feedback, and a team environment where productive disagreement becomes possible. Josh and John also discuss what managers must do to support employee development. Telling people to “develop themselves” is insufficient. Managers need to model personal growth, help employees identify behavioral patterns, provide specific feedback, and create accountability for practicing new actions. KEY TAKEAWAYS Self-awareness is only the beginning. Knowing your tendencies does not create meaningful leadership development unless your behavior changes. Personality is difficult to change, but behavior is more malleable. Leaders can retain their natural tendencies while choosing healthier actions. Development must become specific. Broad goals such as “handle conflict better” should identify when the problem occurs, what behavior becomes visible, and what alternative action to practice. Your actions create consequences that shape your environment. Defensive leadership can teach people to withhold feedback, defer too quickly, or remain at the surface. Small interventions can interrupt established patterns. A deliberate pause, expression of gratitude, or uncontaminated question can change the direction of a difficult conversation. Managers cannot outsource development entirely to employees. Leaders must model growth and help people translate feedback into observable behavioral goals. Insight without practice becomes another form of avoidance. Podcasts, books, coaching, and assessments become useful only when leaders apply what they learn. Sustainable growth is incremental. Leadership behavior changes through repeated practice, particularly in lower-stakes situations before pressure increases. TIMESTAMPED CHAPTERS 00:00 – Welcome and the Discomfort of Challenge 01:19 – When Protecting People From Discomfort Goes Too Far 07:30 – Why Personal Development Often Stops at Insight 09:37 – Leaders Who Talk About Growth but Don’t Practice It 12:50 – How Managers Help Other People Develop Themselves 15:34 – Turning Broad Development Goals Into Visible Behaviors 17:28 – The Will Gap, Skill Gap, and Familiarity Problem 20:17 – Introducing the Know Yourself to Lead Yourself Framework 20:43 – Tendency and Pattern: Recognizing When Defensiveness Appears 22:39 – Action, Consequence, and the Reality Leaders Create 25:54 – Choosing a Healthier Action Under Pressure 27:00 – How Gratitude Interrupts a Defensive Reaction 31:12 – Creating More Honest Feedback and Stronger Relationships 33:40 – How a New Reality Can Reduce Reactive Tendencies 34:28 – Why the Goal Is Not to Eliminate Your Personality 35:55 – Naming Behavioral Strengths and Challenges 40:47 – Moving From Leadership Content to Leadership Practice 42:57 – Listener Homework: Identify One Tiny Behavioral Change LISTENER HOMEWORK Choose one leadership tendency you recognize in yourself. When does it typically appear, and what do you visibly say or do? Notice how other people respond and what kind of environment your behavior creates. Then identify one small, observable action to practice instead. It might be pausing, expressing gratitude, asking a genuine question, or remaining engaged when you want to withdraw. Share your goal with someone you trust: “When this situation occurs, I tend to ____. I am practicing ____ instead. Will you help me notice how I’m doing?” RESOURCES REFERENCED Know Yourself to Lead Yourself framework — episode resource to be added Behavioral Essentials — Behavior Scales Basic...
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • Are You Developing People, or Just Optimizing Them? | Graham Skidmore
    Aug 11 2026
    Episode Overview

    What happens when organizations become so focused on optimizing systems that they stop developing the people inside them?

    Former Rocket Mortgage Graham Skidmore joins Josh and John to discuss burnout after professional success, the difference between coaching and advising, and how leaders can use AI to expand human capability rather than diminish it.

    Graham shares the deeply personal story of reaching the height of professional success while simultaneously experiencing burnout, loss of identity, and growing dissatisfaction. That experience ultimately led him away from corporate leadership and toward a mission centered on human flourishing, spirituality, health, and the responsible use of artificial intelligence.

    Together, the conversation explores how leaders can move beyond managing people as resources and instead create organizations that develop human potential. They discuss why individualized leadership matters, how coaching differs from advising, the role spirituality plays in leadership maturity, and why Graham believes AI should expand, not replace, human agency.

    Rather than viewing AI as humanity's competitor, Graham argues that leaders have an opportunity to use technology to remove routine work while freeing people to think more creatively, solve more meaningful problems, and contribute from their unique strengths. Throughout the conversation, Josh, John, and Graham challenge leaders to shift from optimizing systems alone to investing more intentionally in the growth of the people those systems exist to serve.

    Key Takeaways
    • Professional success does not always lead to personal fulfillment. Sometimes burnout becomes the catalyst for discovering a more authentic way to lead.
    • Coaching develops people differently than advising. Advising teaches someone what to know; coaching helps people better understand themselves.
    • Healthy leadership begins with accepting that people are fundamentally different, not problems to standardize.
    • AI should be used to augment human capability, not diminish human agency or critical thinking.
    • Organizations create better long-term outcomes when they invest in developing people rather than simply optimizing processes.
    • Leaders create stronger organizations when they move from having all the answers to creating environments where collective wisdom can emerge.
    Timestamped Chapters

    00:00 – Introducing Graham Skidmore 08:15 – Success, Burnout, and Leaving Corporate Leadership 17:45 – Coaching, Individuality, and Leadership Development 21:30 – Spirituality, Authenticity, and Leading Others 32:00 – AI, Human Agency, and the Future of Work 53:00 – Staying Grounded Through Uncertainty 01:00:30 – Practical Advice for Leaders

    Listener Homework

    Consider this question:

    Are you spending more time helping people fit your system - or helping them discover how they uniquely contribute to it?

    As you reflect on your own leadership:

    • Where are you relying primarily on advising instead of coaching?
    • How well do you understand the unique strengths of the people you lead?
    • In what ways could AI create more space for human creativity instead of replacing human thinking?

    Finally, ask yourself Graham's central question:

    Am I building systems that optimize people - or systems that help people become more fully themselves?

    Resources Referenced
    • Harmony Health Institute
    • Graham Skidmore on LinkedIn

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 5 mins
  • Communication: Stop Saying "We Have a Communication Problem"
    Aug 4 2026
    Episode Overview

    In this episode of Leadership Limbo, Josh Hugo and John Clark revisit one of the podcast's earliest topics -communication - but through a very different lens. Rather than offering another conversation about how to communicate more effectively, they challenge one of the most common phrases heard in organizations: "We have a communication problem."

    Josh and John argue that while communication is often blamed for organizational dysfunction, it is rarely the root issue. Instead, "communication" has become an easy, socially acceptable diagnosis that is broad enough for everyone to agree with while remaining vague enough that no one has to take ownership.

    The conversation explores what leaders should do instead. Rather than immediately solving for better meetings, better emails, or better systems, they encourage leaders to become curious. What does someone actually mean when they say communication is broken? Are they feeling unheard? Is decision-making unclear? Are roles poorly defined? Is there a lack of psychological safety? Or are deeper issues of maturity, ownership, learning, or organizational systems actually driving the frustration?

    Throughout the episode, Josh and John unpack several underlying causes that frequently hide behind complaints about communication, offering practical questions leaders can use to diagnose the real issue instead of treating symptoms. The discussion ultimately reframes communication as less of a messaging problem and more of a leadership challenge involving self-awareness, clarity, trust, accountability, and organizational design.

    Key Takeaways

    "Communication" is often an incomplete diagnosis. While communication problems certainly exist, leaders should resist accepting the phrase at face value and instead ask what people specifically mean.

    Curiosity beats assumptions. The best leaders resist jumping immediately to solutions and instead ask thoughtful questions that uncover the underlying issue.

    Many communication challenges are actually behavioral challenges. Self-awareness, maturity, ownership, learning, psychological safety, and role clarity often have a greater impact than simply improving information flow.

    Systems matter—but they aren't the starting point. Meetings, processes, and communication tools are important, but they cannot solve problems rooted in culture, mindset, or relationships.

    Great communicators take responsibility for both transmission and reception. Communication is not simply sending information—it requires shared responsibility for understanding.

    Timestamped Chapters

    00:00 – Summer Stories and Season Three Check-In 05:05 – Why "Communication Problems" Are Everywhere 09:45 – What People Really Mean When They Say Communication Is Broken 16:10 – Self-Awareness and Ownership in Communication 25:45 – Role Clarity and Decision Rights 31:00 – Psychological Safety, Learning, and Growth Mindsets 42:10 – When Communication Really Is a Systems Problem 47:30 – Asking Better Questions as a Leader

    Listener Homework

    The next time someone tells you, "Communication is the problem," resist the urge to solve it immediately.

    Instead, ask:

    "What do you mean by that?"

    Keep asking questions until you move beyond the label and uncover the real issue.

    As you listen, pay attention to whether the conversation points toward self-awareness, role clarity, decision-making, psychological safety, learning, systems, or something else entirely.

    Finally, challenge yourself with Josh's reminder:

    Ask questions you don't want the answers to. Those are often the questions that lead to the greatest leadership growth.

    Resources Referenced

    The PIQ Perspective — Josh Hugo (The PIQ Perspective)

    Show More Show Less
    46 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet