Parler VS Amazon and Salesforce Dot Com pt2

Failed to add items

Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping basket is already at capacity.

Add to cart failed.

Please try again later

Add to wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Remove from wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Follow podcast failed

Unfollow podcast failed

Parler VS Amazon and Salesforce Dot Com pt2

Listen for free

View show details

Thomas Talleyrand 0:02 Hello, this is Thomas Talleyrand, and welcome to the PopulistCast Hello ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Episode 10 in Episode 9, we discussed the salesforce.com entry into the censorships base. And I just want to circle back to that to steal from our worst press secretary in the history of the United States. But I'm actually going to circle back to it, I want to make sure that you understand what I'm trying to say. Veritas because salesforce.com for no reason that I can think of other than outright bigotry and discrimination is being canceled from salesforce.com, they could have hundreds of 1000s of dollars. Same thing with RNC who most certainly does have six figures tied up in salesforce.com, plus another six figures that they're being forced to spend, certainly in the $10,000 range, that they're being forced to bend to find another provider. So it's not just the game they provide, find another provider, they also have to pay for the implementation of the new software. So it's an interruption to their business services. And it'll be interesting to see, I don't know that it's legal to sue them, because I'm pretty sure that they have a right to terminate, but, but it's something you had to factor into when you are interviewing prospective vendors when you put out a request for proposal. And prospective vendors are trying to woo your business, you need to start having it written into these contracts, exactly what they're going to do, how they're going to treat language, what the difference, what the definition of words are. I mean, when you have to get down to they have to change the definition from inciting violence to potentially might kind of will incite violence, you need to get that all ironed out and in your contracts. Because most of these contracts are contracts of adhesion. think that if you can't get somebody that you trust, you're going to have to negotiate a better contract. Or possibly, you're going to have to go back to paper and pencil for contact relationship management, or outlook, which a lot of people and small businesses are going to are going to do now. salesforce.com pictures itself is an enterprise platform, it prices itself as an enterprise platform, but it spends a ton of resources and money on trying to woo small businesses. Small businesses are less than 500 employees. So they're not that small. And they make up most of the employer, employees, and employers and opportunity for growth. For companies like salesforce.com, it's just they're not as profitable as an enterprise sale. If you can go into landing a T Mobile account, let's say just use them, you know, you might end up with 10s of 1000s of seats just on one installation, versus trying to get at 10 seats at a time. So you can see where the the scale, you can see where the scale can m pack down their profitability. However, they're going to have to pay out the same kind of sales commission, it's just less effort once they get the product up and running. Now, that's usually negotiated out in price. So they're gonna pay a lot less per seat for a large company, Coca Cola, many fortune 500 company that might decide to use a CRM, they're going to pay less per seat once they negotiate it down. And that's going to be to their economies of scale also. Now, what are we going to discuss today, we're going to discuss the parlor versus Amazon lawsuit. And we'll see where we go from there. I want to keep this one short, get it out. It's the start of spring break. And ladies and gentlemen, thank you to Greg Abbott, for having the common senseThomas Talleyrand 4:33 to go with what the data is showing us and the data is showing us that first of all, masks don't seem to be working as well as they had hoped. And also that people are going to wear masks in heavily populated areas because they just have a common sense. Hey, it might help. Like I discussed before, like I say at the end of my podcast if you're gonna wear a mask, And then 95 do not wear a cloth mask, okay? There's possibly some health problems with that. It might be better than nothing. But if you had to wear masks for a long period of time, you don't you want something that's pretty high grade, you don't want to be breathing in a lot of small particles of cloth or paper into your lungs, you don't know what that's gonna do is those degrade over time? There are some studies that show that it might, might cause cancer. So I don't think we need the government to tell us what to do. I think we're all grown people. That's why in March, I started wearing a mask. It kills me to go to the store. I have severe asthma. like I've discussed before. But thank you, Greg Abbott, for not making it a government mandate. I noticed that in my town, everybody still wears a mask in a grocery store. No one wants to get anybody sick peer pressure. And education would do much more than lying to us. And trying to Gaslight us. It's just that simple. People, you know, ...

No reviews yet