Episode Summary:

Attorney David Senoff delves into the vital collaboration between trial lawyers and appellate counsel, shedding light on how this partnership can elevate a single verdict into a lasting legal precedent. He emphasizes the distinct skills required for trial advocacy versus appellate argumentation, highlighting the crucial role of appellate counsel in pinpointing legal errors and advocating for justice in the appeals process.

Key Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

01:30 – Trial Lawyer vs. Appellate Counsel Roles

03:45 – Importance of Early Involvement of Appellate Counsel

05:20 – Differing Mindsets in Winning at Trial vs. Defending on Appeal

08:10 – Common Pitfalls in Self-Handling Appeals

10:15 – Successful Co-Counsel Relationships for Appellate Work

12:30 – Building Long-Term Partnerships for Stronger Appeals

About the Show:

*Strategic Justice in Action* is a podcast that navigates the intricate realm of legal strategy and advocacy. Join Attorney David Senoff as he explores the intersection of law, justice, and strategic collaboration to empower legal professionals and listeners alike.

Episode Summary:

In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, attorney David Senoff delves into the world of Amicus briefs, shedding light on how these outside perspectives influence appellate courts. He explains the significance of these briefs, how they represent various groups' interests, and their role in shaping legal decisions.

Key Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

01:30 – Definition of Amicus Briefs

03:15 – Importance of Expressing Diverse Perspectives

05:45 – When Amicus Briefs Provide Genuine Help

08:10 – Avoiding Common Mistakes in Drafting Amicus Briefs

10:25 – Impact of Amicus Briefs on Shaping Policy and Law

13:45 – Balancing Advocacy with Accuracy in Amicus Briefs

16:20 – The Future Role of Amicus Briefs in Complex Litigation

About the Show:

Strategic Justice in Action explores the intersection of law, policy, and advocacy through engaging discussions with legal experts and professionals. Delve into the world of strategic legal practices and their impact on shaping justice.

Episode Summary:

In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, attorney David Senoff delves into the intricacies of legal ethics and professional oversight. He sheds light on the role of the Pennsylvania disciplinary board in upholding the integrity of the legal profession, addressing complaints against attorneys, and ensuring accountability. David highlights common ethical transgressions, the importance of understanding and adhering to ethical rules, and the emerging ethical challenges posed by technology and remote work in the legal field.

Key Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

01:30 – Role of the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board

03:45 – Process of Handling Complaints Against Attorneys

06:15 – Typical Conduct Leading to Disciplinary Action

08:30 – Root Causes of Ethical Violations

11:45 – Ethical Challenges in the Post-COVID Era

14:20 – Ethical Concerns in Technology and AI

18:00 – Preventive Steps for Firms to Safeguard Client Information

20:45 – Upholding Integrity and Accountability in Law

About the Show:

Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast that delves into the complexities of legal ethics, professional oversight, and accountability in the legal profession. Join attorney David Senoff as he explores crucial topics that shape the integrity and trust within the justice system.

Episode Summary:

In this compelling episode, David Senoff reveals the unique dynamics of litigating for institutional clients like counties and union funds, where taxpayer and member dollars fuel fights for reimbursement, future coverage, and systemic change. The conversation debunks myths, explores success beyond settlements, and highlights expert coordination to safeguard public health and benefits.

Key Timestamps:

00:01 - Show Introduction

00:30 - Taxpayer/Dues Money at Stake

01:30 - Success = Future Coverage Orders

02:30 - Settlements Trade $ for Behavior Change

03:30 - Clients Drive Cases, Not Lawyers

04:30 - United Front Post-Filing Jockeying

05:30 - Prep: Privilege + Truth = Credibility

06:30 - Expert Village: Health to Stats

07:30 - Resist Early Offers → Policy Wins

08:30 - Litigation Speeds Stalled Reform

09:30 - Closing & Call to Action

About the Show:

"Strategic Justice in Action" arms policyholders and plaintiff firms with litigation-grade intel on insurance bad faith, appellate wins, and public-policy fights. David Senoff, founder of First Law Strategy Group, turns three decades of courtroom victories into strategies that force insurers to pay what they owe.

Episode Summary:

In this impactful episode, David Senoff examines public policy lawsuits that challenge corporate and government actions, from mass torts like Roundup and opioids to scandals like Kids for Cash. The discussion reveals strategic adaptations for broader impact, multi-jurisdiction coordination, evidence from internal records, and balancing passion with precision to achieve lasting systemic change.

Key Timestamps:

00:01 - Show Introduction

00:30 - Mass Torts vs. Govt (Roundup, Kids for Cash)

01:30 - Strategy: Same Case + Policy Lens

02:30 - Counties Sue When Aid Fails

03:30 - MDL/State Coordination

04:30 - Passion vs. Precision (Kids for Cash)

05:30 - Best Evidence: Defendant Docs/Emails

06:30 - Media = Reform Fuel (Use Pros)

07:30 - Kids for Cash Reforms: Elections + Policy

08:30 - Closing & Call to Action

About the Show:

"Strategic Justice in Action" arms policyholders and plaintiff firms with litigation-grade intel on insurance bad faith, appellate wins, and public-policy fights. David Senoff, founder of First Law Strategy Group, turns three decades of courtroom victories into strategies that force insurers to pay what they owe.

Episode Summary:

In this timely episode, David Senoff unpacks the diverse legal landscape of campaigns and elections, covering ballot qualification, finance rules, libel risks, and post-election disputes. The discussion highlights state vs. federal differences, common compliance pitfalls, and proactive strategies for candidates, PACs, and parties to avoid fines and scrutiny.

Key Timestamps:

00:01 - Show Introduction

00:30 - Election Law Scope: Ballot to Recounts

01:30 - PA: Unlimited (No Corps); PACs Report

02:30 - Nonprofits: GOTV Only; IEs No Coordination

03:30 - Fed vs. State Limits Confusion

04:30 - Dual Filing: FEC + State/County

05:30 - Complaints → Late Filing Fines → Scrutiny

06:30 - Hire Finance Dir + Compliance Firm

07:30 - “Paid By” Mailers; Injunctions

08:30 - Incorporate Campaign; Libel Insurance

09:30 - Closing & Call to Action

About the Show:

"Strategic Justice in Action" arms policyholders and plaintiff firms with litigation-grade intel on insurance bad faith, appellate wins, and public-policy fights. David Senoff, founder of First Law Strategy Group, turns three decades of courtroom victories into strategies that force insurers to pay what they owe.

Episode Summary:

In this essential episode, David Senoff defines insurance bad faith and reveals the tactics companies use to deny valid claims, from endless paperwork to abandoning policyholders in lawsuits. The conversation explores remedies like punitive damages, when lowball offers cross the line, and immediate steps for individuals or firms facing wrongful denials.

Key Timestamps:

00:01 - Show Introduction

00:30 - Bad Faith = Knowing Denial

01:30 - First-Party: Deny-Delay Paper Chase

02:30 - Third-Party: Abandon in Lawsuits

03:30 - PA Remedies: Claim + Interest + Fees + Punitives

04:30 - Lowball = Sometimes Negotiation, Sometimes Bad Faith

05:30 - Group Plans: One Denial Hits Thousands

06:30 - Damages Math: $10K → $60K+

07:30 - Bring Bad-Faith Counsel Early

08:30 - Med-Mal + Insurance Overlay

09:30 - Action Step: Document Denials in Writing

10:30 - Closing & Call to Action

About the Show:

"Strategic Justice in Action" arms policyholders and plaintiff firms with litigation-grade intel on insurance bad faith, appellate wins, and public-policy fights. David Senoff, founder of First Law Strategy Group, turns three decades of courtroom victories into strategies that force insurers to pay what they owe.

In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, David Senoff breaks down the complex issue of insurance bad faith. With nearly three decades of experience in appellate advocacy, insurance disputes, and public policy litigation, David explains what legally constitutes bad faith, the tactics insurers use, and what remedies policyholders can pursue when an insurer acts unreasonably.

• The legal definition of insurance bad faith
• Common tactics insurers use to delay or deny claims
• How excessive paperwork requests and lowball offers may signal bad faith
• What remedies are available to policyholders under Pennsylvania law
• The role of punitive damages in deterring insurer misconduct
• How bad faith impacts not just individuals but unions, health funds, and large employers
• When trial lawyers should bring in specialized bad faith counsel

00:01:00 – What insurance bad faith really means 00:02:30 – Common denial tactics and warning signs to watch for 00:05:00 – Pennsylvania’s statute protecting policyholders and available remedies 00:07:30 – Understanding punitive damages and how they’re calculated 00:10:00 – How low settlement offers can signal insurer bad faith 00:12:00 – The broader impact of bad faith on unions, health funds, and institutions 00:14:00 – When trial lawyers should involve bad faith counsel 00:15:00 – Practical advice for policyholders suspecting bad faith

Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast that explores how litigation and appeals shape justice, public policy, and everyday lives. Hosted by appellate attorney David Senoff, Founder of First Law Strategy Group, the show highlights high-stakes cases in insurance bad faith, class actions, campaign and election law, and systemic litigation against corporate or government misconduct. Each episode breaks down complex legal strategies into clear insights—helping attorneys, institutions, and the public understand not only how cases are won, but how they change the law itself.