Send us a text

YouTube Video Description

Law firms face a civil war over AI adoption. On one side, a model that's worked for decades, generating revenue and establishing power structures. On the other, an intelligence revolution that won't disappear in ten years.

In this episode, host Jacob Andra sits down with Adam Wardel, an attorney with 12+ years of experience spanning in-house and law firm roles. Adam sits on Talbot West's advisory board, where he brings legal and compliance expertise to the firm's AI transformation work. He advises his clients and Talbot West on navigating AI adoption in regulated environments.

Jacob Andra is CEO of Talbot West, an AI advisory and implementation firm, and host of The Applied AI Podcast.

Adam makes the case that AI should be thought of as an actual intelligence working alongside you. Not a dashboard you log into. Not another SaaS product adding to your tech sprawl. An intelligence that reviews contracts before you wake up, surfaces only what needs your attention, and handles the routine so you can do the deep thinking that actually requires a human brain. He describes waking up to find that an AI has already reviewed a contract, prepared a brief, and drafted an edited version. All he needs to do is put on his "deep thinking hat" and apply strategic judgment. The routine work is done. The intelligence responds to emails, sets up follow-up appointments, and works around the clock so the attorney can focus on what actually requires human expertise.

The conversation turns to the trap of solving narrow problems. You find a tool that does one thing well (calendaring, discovery review, whatever) and you adopt it. Then another tool for another problem. Before long, you've got a dozen dashboards, fragmented workflows, and you've introduced as much inefficiency as you've eliminated. Jacob points out that even good platforms like Harvey, which handle a basket of related tasks, still create integration challenges with other parts of your workflow. You end up with less tech sprawl than the point-solution approach, but sprawl nonetheless.

The alternative: architect the whole system. Map your workflows end-to-end. Understand where AI can handle 90% of the work versus where humans need to stay heavily involved. Build toward organizational intelligence rather than collecting point solutions. This requires understanding the full landscape of what a firm needs, then designing a set of trade-offs optimized for that specific context. Not a one-size-fits-all platform. Not a collection of tools that don't talk to each other. A coherent architecture that evolves as capabilities improve.

Adam emphasizes that law firm leaders need to bring in people smarter than themselves on this topic. Partners who've reached senior positions are used to knowing the answers. But AI implementation requires different expertise. The best approach is to surround yourself with people who understand the technology deeply, then provide oversight based on your experience with the practice of law.

Jacob stresses that this outside expertise must be vendor-neutral. If your technology advisor represents specific platforms, they'll recommend those platforms whether they fit or not.

The paradigm of the future decouples functionality from interface. Jacob calls this "invisible AI." Intelligence runs in the background. It surfaces touchpoints only when needed. The old model of managing multiple tools gives way to something more integrated and seamless. You don't log into AI. AI is simply embedded in how work gets done.

Jacob makes a crucial point about competitive advantage. If a solution is easy, everyone will adopt it. It becomes table stakes. The firms that pull ahead are the ones doing the harder work of architecting comprehensive systems, understanding dependencies bet

Send us a text

Lumawarp delivers 7% higher accuracy than leading ML models while running 300+ times faster. On the TabArena HELOC default prediction benchmark, it topped the accuracy leaderboard while training on a gaming laptop in about an hour. Competing methods required hundreds of hours on large compute clusters to achieve worse results.

This is the breakthrough that breaks the accuracy/speed tradeoff that has constrained machine learning for decades.

In this episode, Talbot West CEO Jacob Andra sits down with Dr. Alexandra Pasi, CEO of Lucidity Sciences, to explore how Lumawarp achieves these results and what it means for enterprises building AI systems where precision is non-negotiable and milliseconds matter.

The technology employs a novel mathematical framework grounded in partial differential equations and geometric manifold regularization. Rather than relying on deep learning or tree-based methods that struggle with sparse or imbalanced data, Lumawarp constructs optimal kernels directly from training data. The result: superior pattern recognition with microsecond inference times, deployable on edge devices without sacrificing accuracy.

In this conversation, we cover:

Benchmark results showing Lumawarp outperforming XGBoost, MNCA, and other leading models on structured data tasks

Why a few percentage points of accuracy improvement translates to millions of dollars in fraud detection, clinical decision support, and risk modeling

Microsecond inference enabling real-time applications in high-frequency trading, robotics, and predictive maintenance

Edge deployment capabilities for wearables, industrial sensors, and environments where cloud connectivity isn't reliable

The critical difference between models optimized for linguistic plausibility (LLMs) versus mathematical precision (Lumawarp)

How the Talbot West and Lucidity Sciences partnership works: Lumawarp solves the prediction problem, Talbot West solves the deployment problem

As Dr. Pasi explains, traditional ML forces you to choose: fast models sacrifice accuracy, accurate models require massive compute. Lumawarp sits completely outside that tradeoff curve, delivering both simultaneously.

For high-stakes applications where 90% accuracy means a 1-in-10 failure rate, and 99% accuracy means 1-in-100, that difference determines whether you can deploy ML at all.

This episode is essential viewing for executives evaluating AI investments, data scientists looking beyond the LLM hype cycle, and anyone building systems where accuracy and latency both matter.

About the Guest:
Dr. Alexandra Pasi is CEO and co-founder of Lucidity Sciences. A PhD mathematician, she spent over a decade advancing the mathematical foundations of machine learning before pioneering the GPU-parallelizable geometric manifold regularization techniques that became Lumawarp. Her work has demonstrated real-world impact across healthcare (predicting hospital-acquired conditions), finance (high-frequency trading), and scientific research (particle physics detection).

About Talbot West:
Talbot West is an AI enablement firm specializing in enterprise digital transformation. The firm combines full-spectrum AI expertise with Fortune 500 systems architecture methodology, helping organizations deploy the right AI technologies for the right problems. Learn more at talbotwest.com

About Lucidity Sciences:
Lucidity Sciences develops advanced machine learning technologies for pattern identification and prediction in structured data. Their research-driven approach addresses fundamental limitations in existing ML methods, delivering breakthrough improvements in model accuracy, generalizability, and computational efficiency. Learn more at luciditysciences.com

Send us a text

Talbot West CEO Jacob Andra interviews Clarion AI CEO Bennett Borden on ensemble AI approaches.

Bennett Borden served eight years as a CIA data scientist identifying patterns in digital trails, he went to Georgetown Law and specialized in automated decision systems. Now as CEO of Clarion AI, he runs the only law firm that operates as both legal counsel and development shop, building AI systems that drive business value while maintaining legal compliance.

This episode explores multi-agent AI architectures. Borden explains constitutional AI, developed by Anthropic, which programs AI behavior through plain language directives rather than thousands of lines of code. Building with generative AI resembles forming psychology rather than writing deterministic algorithms.

Jacob pushes on the practical challenges of large context windows, where language models become unreliable when processing massive amounts of information. He describes the wobbliness that emerges when models forget what's over here when they're processing over there, and discusses neurosymbolic approaches that use ontological skeletons to help LLMs maintain context. This leads to a deeper discussion of ensemble architectures where specialized agents handle bounded contexts rather than expecting single models to manage everything.

Real implementations combine retrieval augmented generation with constitutional AI and adversarial oversight modules that audit primary agent behavior. These patterns, where modules challenge each other's findings rather than simply cooperating, create robust outcomes that monolithic systems cannot match.

The conversation covers practical enterprise applications. Back office automation handles repetitive, data centric tasks where companies apply the same judgments repeatedly. Knowledge worker augmentation transforms how lawyers, consultants, and accountants work. Borden estimates 80% of legal work can be better handled by AI, freeing professionals to focus on the quintessentially human 20% that requires judgment and strategic thinking.

Jacob probes the definition of agentic AI, noting that almost no one knows what they mean when they use the term. He identifies at least four or five common but conflicting connotations. Borden clarifies that agentic AI is fundamentally a recommendation engine on steroids, where an AI subcomponent makes decisions based on parameters it's given as part of a larger orchestration. This aligns with Talbot West's emphasis on coordinated systems rather than autonomous agents making high stakes decisions without oversight.

Data value extraction emerges as a critical theme. Companies sit on information locked in emails and file systems. Properly curated knowledge bases combined with constitutionalized AI surface insights that distinguish products and services. A retail client's app pulls weather and event data to adjust operations dynamically, increasing cookie production before predicted afternoon rushes. Borden describes predictive compliance systems that monitor for behavior patterns correlating with fraud.

The discussion addresses ensemble architectures that scale from individual modules to nested systems of systems. Specialized modules handle discrete tasks, feeding into domain ensembles that synthesize insights. Higher level meta-ensembles correlate patterns across domains, identifying coordinated activities invisible when viewing any single domain alone. Both speakers emphasize explainability and human oversight, with clear audit trails for every decision.

Talbot West delivers Fortune 500 AI consulting to midmarket and enterprise organizations through its APEX framework and Cognitive Hive AI architecture.

Visit talbotwest.com