Episodes

  • "No Co-Conspirators”: How the DOJ’s Epstein Claim Collapses Under Its Own Unsealed Emails (1/13/26)

    "No Co-Conspirators”: How the DOJ’s Epstein Claim Collapses Under Its Own Unsealed Emails (1/13/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    For months, and most aggressively in its final public posture, the Department of Justice told the public that Jeffrey Epstein acted alone, that there were no co-conspirators worth pursuing, and that the case was effectively closed because the evidence led nowhere else. That claim was presented as the product of exhaustive investigation, a sober conclusion reached after following every lead. But the unsealed Epstein files expose that narrative as a manufactured endpoint, not a factual one. The DOJ’s public insistence that Epstein was a lone predator directly contradicts its own internal records, which show prosecutors and investigators repeatedly discussing other individuals, logistical facilitators, and potential co-conspirators. These weren’t vague references or speculative names. The emails reveal active consideration of witnesses who could implicate others, debates over how far the investigation should go, and deliberate choices to narrow the scope of exposure. In public, the DOJ spoke in absolutes. In private, they spoke in contingencies. That gap is the story.

    The newly unsealed emails make clear that the absence of co-conspirators was not a discovery, it was a decision. Prosecutors expressed concern about expanding the case, about the consequences of naming or charging others, and about preserving agreements that would collapse under scrutiny if the full picture came out. Internal communications reference ongoing leads, cooperation strategies, and awareness that Epstein’s crimes required infrastructure and assistance, yet none of that translated into indictments or even transparent explanations. Instead, the DOJ retroactively sold inaction as resolution. By the time officials told the public there was “no evidence” of co-conspirators, their own records showed they had stopped looking long before the evidence ran out. The unsealed emails don’t just undermine the DOJ’s claim, they obliterate it. What was framed as a lack of proof was, in reality, a lack of will, and the insistence that Epstein operated alone now reads less like a conclusion and more like a cover story built to survive public scrutiny rather than judicial review.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    EFTA00037366.pdf
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Lord Peter Mandelson Refuses To Apologize To Epstein's Survivors In A New BBC Interview (1/13/26)

    Lord Peter Mandelson Refuses To Apologize To Epstein's Survivors In A New BBC Interview (1/13/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    In the wake of renewed scrutiny over his long-standing friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, veteran British politician Lord Peter Mandelson has offered a deeply qualified response that has inflamed survivors and critics alike. In a high-profile BBC interview, Mandelson acknowledged his association with Epstein was a “terrible mistake” and expressed regret for the systemic failures that allowed Epstein’s victims to be ignored and unprotected. He also accepted that his undisclosed communications and supportive emails to Epstein — written even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction — contributed to his dismissal as the UK’s ambassador to the United States and acknowledged the serious consequences of the controversy for his own career. However, while Mandelson expressed sympathy for the suffering of Epstein’s victims and apologized for the broader institutional shortcomings that failed them, he refused to offer a direct personal apology to survivors for his friendship or to accept that he was culpable in any way for Epstein’s crimes. Instead, he insisted he genuinely did not know about Epstein’s criminal conduct and maintained he was not “complicit or culpable” in the abuse, citing his own lack of knowledge and arguing that, as a gay man, he had been largely excluded from the aspects of Epstein’s life connected to the abuse.


    Mandelson’s remarks have provoked sharp criticism from political figures and Epstein survivors who see his refusal to apologize personally as tone-deaf and insufficient given the gravity of Epstein’s abuses and Mandelson’s own continued association with him after his conviction. Cabinet ministers and commentators argued that anyone linked to Epstein should accept responsibility for the “lapse of judgment” that allowed such a relationship to persist, not merely lament systemic failures. Critics also highlighted that Mandelson’s narrative — that he was unaware of Epstein’s crimes — sits uneasily with the extent of his documented friendship and supportive communications, raising questions about accountability, judgment, and the message his qualified response sends to survivors seeking acknowledgment and justice.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Lord Mandelson refuses to apologise to Jeffrey Epstein's victims with Labour peer claiming he had no knowledge of 'evil monster's' depravity because he's gay | Daily Mail Online
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Will Les Wexner Ever Appear Before Congress To Be Deposed About His Relationship With Epstein? (1/13/26)

    Will Les Wexner Ever Appear Before Congress To Be Deposed About His Relationship With Epstein? (1/13/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    Congress’s House Oversight and Government Reform Committee recently moved to **subpoena billionaire retail executive Les Wexner to sit for a deposition as part of its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s network and activities. Lawmakers, led by Rep. Robert Garcia and with support from members on both sides of the aisle, approved subpoenas not only for Wexner but also for Epstein’s longtime lawyer Darren Indyke and accountant Richard Kahn—the co-executors of Epstein’s estate. The panel’s aim is to dig deeper into Epstein’s financial ties and the roles others may have played in enabling or benefiting from his abuses. Wexner, founder and former CEO of what became L Brands (including Victoria’s Secret), had a long financial relationship with Epstein, who managed his personal finances and served as a trustee of his foundation; Wexner has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing but his ties, including reported business arrangements such as selling Epstein one of his properties, have drawn intense scrutiny.

    Supporters of the subpoenas frame them as a key step in “following the money” and providing accountability to survivors by clarifying the full scope of Epstein’s financial network and relationships. Ranking Member Garcia described the actions as advancing justice and transparency, emphasizing the need to understand how Epstein’s activities were supported or facilitated by powerful associates. The subpoenas reflect broader congressional pressure—including votes to force the Justice Department to release millions of pages of investigatory files—to uncover previously unseen details about Epstein’s connections with elite figures. Wexner’s counsel has said he will “cooperate fully,” noting past cooperation with earlier investigations.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    “His wealth should not protect him:” Ohio’s Les Wexner subpoenaed over Epstein connections - cleveland.com
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Title Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The 'Original Sin' (1/13/26)

    Title Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The 'Original Sin' (1/13/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement was the original sin that corrupted every phase of accountability that followed, transforming a prosecutable sex-trafficking case into a blueprint for impunity. The agreement, secretly negotiated between Epstein’s legal team and federal prosecutors in South Florida, halted federal charges in exchange for a state plea that amounted to a work-release arrangement masquerading as punishment. By shielding Epstein and unnamed “co-conspirators” from federal prosecution, the NPA did more than go easy on one defendant; it rewrote the rules of justice in Epstein’s favor. Victims were excluded from the process entirely, denied their statutory rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, while Epstein retained his wealth, mobility, social access, and power. The message to institutions, banks, politicians, and enablers was unmistakable: Epstein was protected, and consequences were negotiable.

    That protection radiated outward for more than a decade. The NPA discouraged future investigations, chilled prosecutorial appetite, and provided a ready-made excuse for inaction whenever new allegations surfaced. Law enforcement agencies treated Epstein as a resolved problem rather than an ongoing threat, while banks, universities, and elites pointed to the plea deal as proof that the system had already dealt with him. When Epstein was finally arrested again in 2019, the damage was irreversible: evidence was stale, victims had aged into silence, and the man at the center of the case had spent years refining his network under the cover of legal legitimacy. The NPA did not merely fail to stop Epstein’s crimes; it actively enabled their continuation by laundering his criminality through the appearance of justice, making his eventual death in custody the final, catastrophic consequence of a deal that should never have existed.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    45 mins
  • The Mega Edition: Diddy And Billionaires Club And The Sex Worker And The Tape (1/12/26)

    The Mega Edition: Diddy And Billionaires Club And The Sex Worker And The Tape (1/12/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    Elite billionaires often utilize their wealth and influence to shield themselves from accusations of crimes, leveraging their resources to manipulate legal systems, media narratives, and public opinion. These tactics can include hiring high-powered legal teams to intimidate accusers, settling cases out of court with non-disclosure agreements to silence victims, or employing private investigators to dig up dirt on those who speak out against them.

    Additionally, these billionaires often surround themselves with wealthy and influential friends who act as enablers, providing support and protection in various forms. This network of connections can be instrumental in suppressing allegations, exerting pressure on whistleblowers, or even influencing law enforcement and judicial processes.

    Furthermore, the immense financial resources at their disposal afford them access to top-tier lawyers, lobbyists, and public relations experts who specialize in managing and minimizing damage to their reputations. This combination of wealth, power, and influence creates significant barriers for accusers seeking justice and perpetuates a cycle of impunity among the elite.

    In essence, elite billionaires utilize their wealth and power not only to evade accountability for their actions but also to actively thwart efforts to hold them responsible, with the assistance of their well-connected allies and enablers.

    In this episode, we get a look at the Rogue's gallery that was enabling Diddy and financing his many different projects.



    (commercial at 10:56)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Secrets of Sean Diddy Combs' billionaire boys club (nypost.com)




    Attorney Tony Buzbee has announced that his firm is representing over 50 individuals who have come forward to file lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs. These lawsuits involve accusations of sexual assault and abuse, with Buzbee serving as lead counsel. The cases are part of a growing wave of legal challenges against Combs, who is already facing serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. The lawsuits are expected to add significant pressure to the ongoing criminal investigations into Combs' alleged misconduct.


    In our second article...



    Recent developments in Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal case have taken a surprising turn. A male sex worker recently provided federal investigators with a video allegedly showing a sexual encounter involving himself, Diddy, and a woman. The encounter, which took place in May 2023, was reportedly filmed by Diddy. The male sex worker, who flew from Atlanta to Miami for the event, handed over the video after signing a proffer agreement with federal prosecutors. This agreement allows him to speak without fear of prosecution.

    The video is part of an ongoing investigation into Diddy's alleged involvement in sex trafficking and racketeering. The male sex worker also provided details about the types of drugs Diddy allegedly used during what were referred to as "freak-offs"—Diddy's notorious group sex parties. Diddy, who was arrested earlier in September 2024, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. If convicted, he faces a potential life sentence.






    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    Tony Buzbee law firm representing those suing Sean 'Diddy' Combs | khou.com



    source:

    Male 'sex worker' hands over alleged Diddy 'freak off' tape to prosecutors after meeting feds in NYC | Daily Mail Online
    Show More Show Less
    29 mins
  • Mega Edition: Virginia Robert's And The Deposition That Exposed Maxwell And Epstein (Part 17-19) (1/12/26)

    Mega Edition: Virginia Robert's And The Deposition That Exposed Maxwell And Epstein (Part 17-19) (1/12/26)
    Jan 13 2026
    In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.

    Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.



    to contact me;

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1090-32.pdf
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr
  • The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Part 10)

    The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Part 10)
    Jan 13 2026
    ​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.


    Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticity


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf
    Show More Show Less
    18 mins
  • Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Part 9)

    Sara Rivers And Her Allegations Against Diddy (Part 9)
    Jan 13 2026
    Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.

    This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sara cmplt
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins