Episodes

  • 'Pussyfooting Around' & 'Bathroom Humor' & 'The Trailer with a Hitch'

    'Pussyfooting Around' & 'Bathroom Humor' & 'The Trailer with a Hitch'
    Feb 26 2026
    First, the plaintiff purchased a kitten from the defendant, but it had a bunch of health issues, so the plaintiff is suing for vet bills. The defendant argues he has already given the plaintiff $1,000 and even offered to treat the kitten at his own vet. Then, the plaintiff says he hired the defendant to retile a bathroom, but he messed up the shower enclosure, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits he damaged the shower enclosure, but they made a deal that he wouldn't have to pay the rest of his wages. Plus, the plaintiff built a trailer for his daughter, but the defendants stole it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendants insist they purchased the trailer from someone else, and they're not going to give it to the plaintiff just because he says it's his. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Feeling Flighty' & 'Rotten Renting' & 'Blame the Wind'

    'Feeling Flighty' & 'Rotten Renting' & 'Blame the Wind'
    Feb 25 2026
    First, the plaintiff says she purchased an airplane ticket for the defendant, but he didn't go on the trip or pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff bought him the ticket as a gift only because she has the hots for him. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant, a real estate broker, to find her an apartment. She paid him, but when the plaintiff went to her new apartment, the defendant and his friends were partying there. The plaintiff backed out of the deal and is suing for her money back. The defendant argues he is the one who changed his mind because he determined the plaintiff didn't have the money to pay rent regularly. Plus, the plaintiff was parked at her bagel place when the defendant banged his door into her vehicle. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the winds were excessive that day, so the door hit the plaintiff's car. However, it's not his fault that the wind caused the damage. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Hard Times' & 'Breakup Back and Forth' & 'Clunker Car'

    'Hard Times' & 'Breakup Back and Forth' & 'Clunker Car'
    Feb 24 2026
    First, the plaintiff says the defendant fell on hard times and moved in with her. However, the defendant never paid one of the electric bills she was responsible for, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff was supposed to pay the electric bills. Then, the plaintiff says she and the defendant dated for a while. However, the defendant owes money for multiple loans, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits the plaintiff gave him money here and there, but he did the same. Plus, the plaintiffs say their car broke down, so they went to the defendant's shop. However, after the job, the car still wouldn't start, so the plaintiffs are suing. The defendant argues he did everything he could to help the plaintiffs and is owed for the work he did. The defendant is countersuing for the balance owed on the repair. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Doesn’t Look Like a Casanova' & 'Rusty Tires' & 'Boycott in Epcot'

    'Doesn’t Look Like a Casanova' & 'Rusty Tires' & 'Boycott in Epcot'
    Feb 23 2026
    First, the plaintiff used to be in a relationship with the defendant, and they moved in together. The plaintiff claims her ex-boyfriend won’t return a television and air conditioning unit, so she’s suing for the cost of the items. The defendant argues his ex-girlfriend used his money to buy the TV and air conditioner, so he doesn’t think he owes. Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant’s repair shop because he needed new tires. He claims the defendant used a sledgehammer to hit the tires, and after he got it back, his axle began smoking. He’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant argues the rims on the plaintiff’s truck were badly rusted, so she had to use a sledgehammer. She thinks the plaintiff is trying to sue her for a car problem that she didn’t cause. Plus, the plaintiff rented a condo near Disney World for herself, her husband, and two women she cares for. She says she had to cancel due to a last-minute health problem, but now the defendant, who owns the rental company, won’t return her deposit. She says she wants the deposit back so she can reschedule her trip for another time. The defendant claims the plaintiff called him on Christmas Eve to cancel, and he agreed to let her reschedule. He says the plaintiff demanded a refund several months later, but he doesn’t issue them. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Baby Daddy Looks 12' & 'Horsing Around' & 'Broke Because of the Broker'

    'Baby Daddy Looks 12' & 'Horsing Around' & 'Broke Because of the Broker'
    Feb 20 2026
    First, the plaintiff’s 19-year-old boyfriend has a son with the defendant, and the plaintiff, 34, is also pregnant with her boyfriend’s child. She claims the defendant keyed her car because she was angry when she found out the plaintiff was pregnant. She’s suing for car damages. The defendant admits she got upset, but claims she never keyed the plaintiff’s car. She thinks the plaintiff did it herself and is just pinning the damage on her. Then, the plaintiff boarded her horses with the defendants, and the defendants were going to sell one of the horses. She moved her horse to another location, but then the horse was found at the defendant’s barn. The plaintiff is suing for boarding costs. The defendant argues he had a free lease with the plaintiff, meaning they board it and the plaintiff pays for upkeep. They’re countersuing for equipment. Plus, the plaintiff gave the defendant a deposit for an apartment. She says the defendant never gave the money to the broker and he pocketed the money for himself. She’s suing for the money back. The defendant argues he works for the real estate agent and gets commission. He claims he never got money from the plaintiff directly. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Holding His Home Goods Hostage' & 'Small Color Change Leads to Big Mess' & 'Cat Hoarder Leaves Behind a Scent'

    'Holding His Home Goods Hostage' & 'Small Color Change Leads to Big Mess' & 'Cat Hoarder Leaves Behind a Scent'
    Feb 19 2026
    First, the plaintiff and defendant used to be in a relationship, and they lived together. The plaintiff says she bought a car and her ex-boyfriend took it after a few weeks. He sped over train tracks and the car went flying, causing the car to break down. She says the defendant refuses to pay her, so she’s suing for damages. The defendant argues they bought the car together. He claims the plaintiff is holding his belongings hostage and caused him to get fired. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to refinish his wood floors. He claims the defendant completely botched the job, so he’s suing for a refund, damages, and the cost of new flooring. The defendant argues he has been doing floors for 25 years, and the plaintiff is just one of those customers who is never happy. Plus, the plaintiff rented a house from the defendant. She says the place smelled like cat urine because the previous tenant was a cat hoarder who had 60 felines. The plaintiff claims the defendant won’t return her security deposit, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff complained about problems from the start. He claims the plaintiff left the house a mess when she moved out, so he has every right to hold her security deposit. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'He Didn’t Steal — He Snatched' & 'Couch Confrontation' & 'Distracted Driving Damages'

    'He Didn’t Steal — He Snatched' & 'Couch Confrontation' & 'Distracted Driving Damages'
    Feb 18 2026
    First, the plaintiff is a cab driver who took the defendant home one night. He says the defendant was drunk and didn’t pay when he got out. The plaintiff kept the defendant’s phone as collateral and ran after him, but then the defendant beat him up. He’s suing for the cost of new teeth, lost wages, and emotional distress. The defendant argues he tried to pay with a credit card, but the driver demanded cash. He says he asked the plaintiff to wait while he got cash, but then the plaintiff ran after him. He claims he was defending himself. Then, the plaintiff purchased a leather couch from the defendant’s store, but now but cushions are starting to peel. He says he took the cushion to an upholsterer, who told him it wasn’t actually leather. He’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues he special-ordered the couch for the plaintiff. Plus, the plaintiff bought it five years prior to the lawsuit. He doesn’t issue refunds, so he’s not giving the plaintiff one. Plus, the plaintiff asked the defendant to pick her up in her car, but then the defendant hit a brick wall and a woman. She says she is having problems collecting damages from the defendant, so she’s suing for the cost of the car. The defendant argues she panicked because the plaintiff yelled at her and put her dog in the backseat. She thinks the accident was the plaintiff’s fault because she distracted her. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    44 mins
  • 'Use Your Voice' & 'Bulldog Bill' & 'Lawyer v. Lawyer'

    'Use Your Voice' & 'Bulldog Bill' & 'Lawyer v. Lawyer'
    Feb 17 2026
    First, the plaintiff is a voiceover actress. She says the defendant used her voice in an ad, but he never paid her, so she’s suing. The defendant admits he asked the plaintiff to be in his commercial. He says he told the defendant he couldn’t pay her for this commercial, but he would pay her for the next one. Then, the plaintiff purchased an English bulldog puppy from the defendant’s shop. She says her puppy was extremely sick when she brought her home, so she rushed the dog to the hospital. The plaintiff claims the dog was not fit to come home because she was still sick. She’s suing for vet bills. The defendant argues his vet gave the dog a clean bill of health, so he doesn’t owe. Then, the plaintiff was parking his car in a lot near his office when an attendant driving the defendant’s car hit him. He claims the parking attendant tried to fight him, but all he wants is for the defendant who allowed the attendant to park her car to pay up. She argues there’s no damage to the car, so she doesn’t owe. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Show More Show Less
    45 mins