Episodes

  • Parler VS Amazon Web Services PT3

    Parler VS Amazon Web Services PT3
    Mar 29 2021
    Thomas Talleyrand  0:02  Good morning ladies and gentlemen. We're heading into episode number 11. We are moving right along. We're going to get back into parlor verse Amazon. We are going to also discuss some other information that is broken rich recently pastor coats in Canada has been set up to be fried. I don't know if he's free yet but I believe he is. The button administration and salts China, China hits back at the Biden administration. One of the dumbest, idiotic, I mean, you know, what do you expect when you hire a bunch of Obama retreads? Okay, so getting back into the parlor versus Amazon lawsuit, we're on page 20 chapter 59. This termination by AWS could not have come at a worse time for parlour a time when the company was surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days. Worse than the timing was the result. parlor tried to find alternative companies to host it and they repeatedly are unable to do so often because of the public defamation by AWS. This delayed parlours ability to get back online by over a month. That delay meant that many past parlor users have had to move on to other platforms. telegram past 500 million users as people seek Facebook and Twitter alternatives. And that is in the Kevin Shively parlor CEO john mattes responded angrily after jack Dorsey endorsed Apple's removal of a social network favored by conservatives, Business Insider. I mean, why he would even say something publicly when he knows that he's got antitrust lawsuits coming against him. parlor rival social media apps that are alternatives to Facebook and Twitter are experiencing experiencing record growth on parler was not available both current users and prospective users turn to alternatives, including but not limited to Twitter, or Facebook. And once those user users have begun to use another platform, they may not switch or return to parlor after parlor was offline for over a month 61 by silencing parlor, AWS silences the millions of parlor users who do not feel comfortable using Twitter or other social media apps to express their views because among other things, these other companies take advantage of users personal data for advertising and other revenue sources. What is more by pulling the plug on parlour but leaving Twitter alone despite the posting of massive amounts of troublesome content on Twitter and Amazon itself, AWS has revealed that it's expressed reasons for suspending parlor service are but pretext. Because AWS declared we cannot provide services to a customer that is unable to effectively identify and remove content that encourages or incites violence against others. AWS NATS the pending termination of parlor services. But AWS knew that its allegations against parlor was specious. Okay, little analysis here. parlor was doing everything and actually being more responsive than Twitter, Amazon itself, Facebook and other companies that Amazon does business with. Amazon accepts advertising from facebook, facebook, except that accepts advertising from parlour. They're all incestuous. They all work together. They at least have a business relationship if not a monopoly monopolistic relationship. So this is very, very worrisome if you are a consumer because of the way that they are crushing speech. And it goes into what China had to say about the United States with the government using social media platforms to censor speech just like China does. However, we are supposed to be above it all we're not supposed to act like China. Instead, we're acting worse, China at least tries to look out for some of its citizens. If parlour were a newspaper, AWS would try to portray the content it flagged as appearing in on the front page but as the facts above showThomas Talleyrand  4:41  the minimal amount of problematic material that AWS flag combined with the fact that much of us buried could not be easily shared, meant it was hardly noticed. Those of parlour was a newspaper the problematic content was buried at the bottom right column on page d 17. And small type the reason that they are go through such links to explain the this stuff in terminology that someone who's not internet friendly or internet savvy can understand is because what they ran into what this judge who should, you know, have retired A long time ago a woman has no business. Being a federal judge in high tech case, especially Making matters worse, Chapter 65 or paragraph 65 AWS leaked this termination email to the press knowing that it's allegations of email, claiming that parlor was unable to find and remove content that encouraged encouraged violence for false. So AWS in a parlours opinion. The reason that they defined parlor was not only to lie and break the contract, but in their opinion, it was to library contract and put parler out of business so that they couldn't compete against data against AWS is number one client or one of their biggest clients, Twitter. Getting you know, they go into all of their AWS ...
    Show More Show Less
    53 mins
  • Parler VS Amazon and Salesforce Dot Com pt2

    Parler VS Amazon and Salesforce Dot Com pt2
    Mar 16 2021
    Thomas Talleyrand  0:02  Hello, this is Thomas Talleyrand, and welcome to the PopulistCast Hello ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Episode 10 in Episode 9, we discussed the salesforce.com entry into the censorships base. And I just want to circle back to that to steal from our worst press secretary in the history of the United States. But I'm actually going to circle back to it, I want to make sure that you understand what I'm trying to say. Veritas because salesforce.com for no reason that I can think of other than outright bigotry and discrimination is being canceled from salesforce.com, they could have hundreds of 1000s of dollars. Same thing with RNC who most certainly does have six figures tied up in salesforce.com, plus another six figures that they're being forced to spend, certainly in the $10,000 range, that they're being forced to bend to find another provider. So it's not just the game they provide, find another provider, they also have to pay for the implementation of the new software. So it's an interruption to their business services. And it'll be interesting to see, I don't know that it's legal to sue them, because I'm pretty sure that they have a right to terminate, but, but it's something you had to factor into when you are interviewing prospective vendors when you put out a request for proposal. And prospective vendors are trying to woo your business, you need to start having it written into these contracts, exactly what they're going to do, how they're going to treat language, what the difference, what the definition of words are. I mean, when you have to get down to they have to change the definition from inciting violence to potentially might kind of will incite violence, you need to get that all ironed out and in your contracts. Because most of these contracts are contracts of adhesion. think that if you can't get somebody that you trust, you're going to have to negotiate a better contract. Or possibly, you're going to have to go back to paper and pencil for contact relationship management, or outlook, which a lot of people and small businesses are going to are going to do now. salesforce.com pictures itself is an enterprise platform, it prices itself as an enterprise platform, but it spends a ton of resources and money on trying to woo small businesses. Small businesses are less than 500 employees. So they're not that small. And they make up most of the employer, employees, and employers and opportunity for growth. For companies like salesforce.com, it's just they're not as profitable as an enterprise sale. If you can go into landing a T Mobile account, let's say just use them, you know, you might end up with 10s of 1000s of seats just on one installation, versus trying to get at 10 seats at a time. So you can see where the the scale, you can see where the scale can m pack down their profitability. However, they're going to have to pay out the same kind of sales commission, it's just less effort once they get the product up and running. Now, that's usually negotiated out in price. So they're gonna pay a lot less per seat for a large company, Coca Cola, many fortune 500 company that might decide to use a CRM, they're going to pay less per seat once they negotiate it down. And that's going to be to their economies of scale also. Now, what are we going to discuss today, we're going to discuss the parlor versus Amazon lawsuit. And we'll see where we go from there. I want to keep this one short, get it out. It's the start of spring break. And ladies and gentlemen, thank you to Greg Abbott, for having the common senseThomas Talleyrand  4:33  to go with what the data is showing us and the data is showing us that first of all, masks don't seem to be working as well as they had hoped. And also that people are going to wear masks in heavily populated areas because they just have a common sense. Hey, it might help. Like I discussed before, like I say at the end of my podcast if you're gonna wear a mask, And then 95 do not wear a cloth mask, okay? There's possibly some health problems with that. It might be better than nothing. But if you had to wear masks for a long period of time, you don't you want something that's pretty high grade, you don't want to be breathing in a lot of small particles of cloth or paper into your lungs, you don't know what that's gonna do is those degrade over time? There are some studies that show that it might, might cause cancer. So I don't think we need the government to tell us what to do. I think we're all grown people. That's why in March, I started wearing a mask. It kills me to go to the store. I have severe asthma. like I've discussed before. But thank you, Greg Abbott, for not making it a government mandate. I noticed that in my town, everybody still wears a mask in a grocery store. No one wants to get anybody sick peer pressure. And education would do much more than lying to us. And trying to Gaslight us. It's just that simple. People, you know, ...
    Show More Show Less
    45 mins
  • Salesforce Dot Com Enters the Censorship Wars | Texas Follows the Science Human | Trafficking Tragedy

    Salesforce Dot Com Enters the Censorship Wars | Texas Follows the Science Human | Trafficking Tragedy
    Mar 9 2021
    https://www.projectveritas.com/news/leaked-insider-tape-reveals-salesforces-plan-to-deplatform-broader-range-of/https://babylonbee.com/news/in-an-effort-to-scare-all-the-californians-back-texas-removes-mask-mandateepisode-9Fri, 3/5 · 8:08 PM34:10SUMMARY KEYWORDSSPEAKERSThomas (100%) TTThomas Talleyrand0:02Hello, this is Thomas Talleyrand, and welcome to the populous cast. Hello everybody and welcome to the populist cast. So we're gonna get into salesforce.com. And really what they did was Project Veritas, Project Veritas is being cut off from salesforce.com. Then ironically, Project Veritas gets a leaked video from salesforce.com. And maybe one of the creepiest people I've ever watched beach or speak, that's in business. Some gaming Brad Taylor talk about the fact that Salesforce apparently has the moral authority to not make sure that they make a good product, not fulfill the contracts of their customers not to operate a business in an ethical way. Now they have the responsibility to determine what speech might possibly in some world incite violence, as long as it's not a Democrat. We know this because they've done nothing against anybody with the DNC, anybody on the left, we know that there are many, many news organizations that use some form of Salesforce, especially their Pardot product, or something else that they have, Salesforce has quite a large number of customers. And the reason that I wanted to take some time to talk about this is because, up until just a few days ago, I was kind of a salesforce.com fanboy hair product. Really pretty good. There's some downside to it. But there's, you know, it's really robust. And if you take the time to learn it, you can get a lot out of it. Marc Benioff has always been somewhat of a hero of mine. He was he's probably one of the best salespeople of our time. And, you know, he did a lot of good when he was at Oracle. He and Larry Ellison did a lot of good for Oracle. But then Benioff left. Ellison was on the board at one time, and may still be@salesforce.com, I haven't kept up with things. We haven't been a customer or I haven't been a customer, there's in quite some time. But salesforce.com in case you don't know what it is is the very first cloud product that really got some traction. And they ran salesforce.com for a long time, with a very small number of hacked together PCs, out of a bedroom of a house, across the street, or maybe it's been a while since I've read Mark's book, across the street, or behind or adjacent to Marc Benioff, personal house, they ran cables between the windows of the two houses when they were getting started, I think they started with $600,000. And I can't remember if it was 11 PCs or 111 PCs, it was a small number of PCs that they then turned into a dis-connected cloud computing service. That was really earth-shattering at the time. And one of the number one things that you had that Salesforce had to compete against was, why would I want to put my information in the cloud? Why do I how do I as a company not want to own my enterprise data, and salesforce.com very successfully made the point that they could stay up and that they could solve problems faster than you could if you had your own bare metal hosting, say, Microsoft CRM, or Microsoft CRM 3.0. After that, it started being available through the cloud. That was a big break, but it still requires much, much more detailed, specialized knowledge to make Microsoft CRM work. Siebel ended up with an online offering through Oracle bought Siebel and Larry Ellison helped start NetSuite. NetSuite is a direct competitor. In some ways with salesforce.com, although its content, content relation management, the software is not as robust as salesforce.com. However, it's all integrated. Many people use salesforce.com, or many clients use salesforce.com and NetSuite combined. They use NetSuite for their accounting functions, and their inner source, enterprise resource planning functions. And then they use salesforce.com for their marketing and Salesforce side. Salesforce, regretfully, not Pardot, Pardot was an Atlanta company that was deep into marketing automation, what marketing automation allowed you to do is, let's say that you are a company that did direct sales to businesses or you're a fundraiser, you could contact somebody or have somebody be directed onto your website, or your Twitter page or Facebook page, or any of your social media outlets that were considered the big three. And if they interacted with you, say they just logged on to the website, they clicked on the link that brought them to the website, in the link and the website, there would be cookies, these are the famous cookies, everybody has to sign off on those cookies, then give the give the tracking information so that six months later, three months later, if you fill out a form, and it says hey, I want some information about your widget number three, then that cookie then coalesces all of your data together with all...
    Show More Show Less
    34 mins
  • Fortifying the Election with a Color Revolution Part 2

    Fortifying the Election with a Color Revolution Part 2
    Mar 5 2021
    Raw transcript and links below.Thomas Talleyrand  0:02  Hello, this is Thomas Talleyrand and welcome to the PopulistCast.Thomas Talleyrand  0:12  Hello, folks, here we go episode eight. This is part two. Going over the time article in part one just to refresh your memory went into detail into how the propaganda campaign made it to where people that were feeling like they were doing the right thing might have been tempted to cast a vote or to in excess of what they were legally entitled to. In Time magazine's article by Molly ball. Says and I quote, their work touched every aspect of the election, they got states to change voting systems and laws and help secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time, they successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data driven strategies to fight viral smears. They executed national public awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump's conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction after election day they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result. The Untold Story of the election is the 1000s of people of both parties who accomplished the triumph of American democracy. At its very foundation, says norm Eisen, a prominent lawyer and former Obama administration official who recruited Republicans and Democrats boarded the Voter Protection Program and quote, who is normal? That's a good question. According to revolver news, norm Eisen is the man who implemented, implemented David Brock's blueprint for suing the president into paralysis and his allies in the bankruptcy, who helped mainstream and amplify the Russian hoax who drafted 10 articles of impeachment for the democrats a full month before President Trump ever called the Ukraine president and 2018, who personally served as special counsel litigating the Ukraine impeachment. He created a template for Internet censorship of world leaders and a handbook for mass mobilizing racial justice protesters to overturn democratic election results. There's perhaps no man alive with a more decorated resume for plots against President Trump, according to revolver. So Eisen is a Russia hoax, disinformation guy. He has a long history, being involved in color revolutions. He was the ethics czar under Obama. He was a friend of Obama's from and still is, for all we know, from back in college and in law school. So basically, what we've got is a man named norm eyes and then some other people running a color revolution against a duly elected United States President. And he wrote a book about how to use color revolutions called the democracy playbook preventing and reversing democratic backsliding, nor my son, Andrew Keneally, Susan Koch and somebody else. So how did this guy end up doing that? Being involved in this, I think he works for Perkins coie. And it only gets more fascinating, outrageous and indispensable to understanding the plan to chaos unfolding before our eyes, once again, according to revolver in September, leading up to perhaps be the most chaotic election in our nation's history. Before we can fully appreciate the significance of normal since color revolution manual, the playbook, we must contextualize the importance in relation to its place and the literature. They give a refresher to the reader to let you know what that what these color revolutions have been used for. They were used in the Arab Spring. They were used against the Soviet Union. They were used To end checklist lochia they were used in Hungary, Poland,Thomas Talleyrand  5:06  Latin America, this has been an ongoing, well-documented way to run a coup against a democratically elected government that the United States doesn't like, quote, a color revolution in this context refers to a specific type of coordinated attack that the United States government has been known to deploy against foreign regimes, particularly in Eastern Europe, deemed to be authoritarian and hostile to American entrust, rather than using direct military intervention to effect regime change, as in Iraq, color revolutions, attacked a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing the mass protest, and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure a favorable coverage to their agenda in the western press. What does this sound like? It sounds exactly what Molly ball is explaining in the Time magazine article. Going back to the time article, Molly ball, points out that there were no riots, no violence after the election, and that it was eerie because in her words, they thought that they were going to have all these violent protests from left-wing groups that are dedicated to overthrowing the government...
    Show More Show Less
    40 mins
  • The confession of the Democrat Party

    The confession of the Democrat Party
    Feb 7 2021
    A quick intro into what the Time Magazine Article means.Thomas Talleyrand  0:00  Welcome to the popular cast. So Friday, we found out that President Trump was right. That revolver was right, and that we just experienced a color revolution. On Friday, Time Magazine, released an article explaining exactly how the Democratic Party and Obama operatives, conspired with big tech and big labor to overthrow the election. There's no other way to say it. What they did was they changed the roles illegally in many cases, and made it easier for people to vote in such a way that being competent that their votes were counted for Lee is suspect. And the reason that they did this is apparently to ensure that no matter how well did they could generate enough votes to overcome any problems that he might have. You know, the easiest place to see this is in Georgia, but also in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Nevada. Those are the big states, I think it's six states that represented enough issues that Trump should have won the election had prior uses of election or ballot integrity been upheld. However, one thing that they did is that they follow the color revolution playbook. The color revolution has been around for a long time it can be used against the Soviet Union, it was used against Eastern Bloc countries for very, very effectively. That's what it was developed for. And then it's also been used, and other countries. America wants to overthrow a government. You know, this is what happens when you let a when you have a media that demonizes anybody, instead of honestly reporting the fact there were so many things with Trump to be upset about that had the immediate just reported the fact that Trump might not have ever got a chance to win. There's no way that Biden has ever been able to overtake Trump without this shadowy cabal to use time and article terminology, providing him help. Now the question that we need to look at is what they did legal? Did they violate any laws in the process? Doing what they did with the election? And the answer on part of it is obviously no free speech is a double edged sword times. And if you believe in it, then you must believe in it, whether it benefits you or not. While I think it is immoral and indefensible to lay that the press covered Prop, due to the outrageous number of absolute falsehoods and lies, I do think that they have the ability to demonize anybody they want, especially in public life. The situation with MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and some extent fox news is that they are talking about a person. And as long as they have some reason to think what they're saying might be true. They're not being malicious about it, that they have the right to say it. So what they did was a a propaganda campaign. That is pretty standard in any type of coup preceded by a propaganda campaign in this type of color revolution playbook.Thomas Talleyrand  4:47  And they demonized Trump, often, falsely, but still at work. So they made a situation to where if you were a person thinks of yourself as a law abiding citizen and a honest person. They're sitting at your apartment that you just moved in. Two years ago. Let's had 15 people live there, and had gets 15 mail in ballots mailed, mailed to it. What would you do to stop literally, Hitler. I mean, the guy put kids in cages, he probably didn't even feed them, or let them go to the bathroom. I mean, he's as evil as it gets. He wouldn't let illegal immigration flourish because of the amount of people trying to get into this country that are abused and taken advantage of when they do so. Not only is he literally Hitler, but he was controlled by Putin. Not only was he controlled by Putin, but he only liked tyrants. And he was tyrannical. I mean, he wrote or signed an executive order that banned the Muslims. I mean, it didn't actually ban Muslims, it actually just banned some people coming in from certain countries that happened to be mostly Muslim countries, although not all of them were because they didn't have the proper way to find out. People were before they got here. I mean, that's the sense in most places, but with Democrats who are weaponizing, the fact that they're throwing it, because they didn't win the last election, and power is everything, and you have absolutely zero moral compass. But I digress. If you're sitting there as a woke person who is so triggered by the fact that a guy who is crashes in the opposite bin, you will do anything to stop, literally Hitler, literally do anything. And you have those 15 mallets sitting there on the couch, there staring at you in the face. And you're looking at those 15 ballots, you're saying no one ever gets in trouble for voter fraud. And, you know, they're talking about how secure mail in ballot is, I guess if I build these out, I bet these people taught me to because literally, everyone hates Hitler, and Trump is Hitler. Literally, Trump is Hitler. Let me say that again. Literally. ...
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Lincoln Project corruption and Trump fires his attorney's

    Lincoln Project corruption and Trump fires his attorney's
    Feb 4 2021
    Thomas Talleyrand  0:00  Hello, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to episode six. Today we're going to talk about just a few things politically. I think I might want to get into a little bit of information about some books that I think are illustrative. The first thing to talk about, though, is President Trump has made the move to get rid of his lawyer. The lawyers that he hired had close ties to Lindsey Graham, and there are reasons to believe that these lawyers were trying to do more to protect their personal image and the Senate than they were to take care of their client. I have a huge problem with this. Thomas Talleyrand  0:52   A lot of people expect their lawyers to stand up for their clients. Now, there's an ethical issue if the client wants you to go in a direction that is against your beliefs. But there, you know, the fact that Trump wanted to bring up the election, it should not be a surprise to anybody. Also, I think any lawyer who took the man's coin to start with and had no intentions of doing this or serving more than one master, is making an ethical violation, certainly a moral violation. If indeed, that is the case, the lawyers certainly ran to the microphones as fast as they could, by leaking to or talking to people in the press to let them know that the reason that they were divorcing themselves from Trump or had been fired, however you want to put it was that they did not want to present evidence of irregularities with the election, and with the way that the election was conducted. I suspect that the real issue was that Trump wants to call McConnell as a witness. If he doesn't want to call him a con once a witness. Hopefully, his new lawyers will tell him that he should. Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi both need to be subpoenaed. The FBI needs to be looked at. And these witnesses need to be cross-examined by Trump's staff in order to determine whether the amount of security on Capitol Hill was the proper amount of security. And the warnings that we have been late to, to beat excuse me that were We were told were given by the FBI in New York and various other agencies that had intelligence that something was going to go down on the sixth. And also, we know that there were apparently undercover or informants involved, in making this situation worse. Why was the Capitol Hill police in such a low mode of readiness? The readiness situation has to be examined. Did Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi stand down the Capitol Police hoping that something would happen if it was made easier to do? So we've all seen security levels at the Capitol Hill during the Kavanaugh hearings when they apparently had some problems with not having enough police, but then with the BLM riots, you know, they had plenty of security. So, you know, it looks like to me when they actually think that there's going to be a reason to be concerned about security. They definitely have the ability to protect the people that are legally in the Capitol Hill Complex, because you not only haveThomas Talleyrand  4:26  the staff members and Congresspeople, but you also have tours. And you have members of the public conducting business in Capitol Hill. So the endangerment of those folks needs to be looked into. And if once again, if Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell did indeed tell the Capitol Hill police to stand down. That's a problem. Nate lawyer has a YouTube channel where he goes over this information and detail how that how he foresees things, or how he sees things. And he used to be a cop. And even though he's pretty well a lefty, I have a lot of respect for Nate. And, you know, so do several other YouTube lawyers who I have a lot of respect for. So to get somebody to give you the inside, as suggest that you go look at what Nate the lawyer has to say his name is Nate Brody. Used to be in New York City policeman. He's been a prosecutor. And now he's a YouTube lawyer. And he is definitely someone that has a firm understanding of how VIP protection works. Have event protection works, so on and so forth. Just like what you get from Dan Bongino. I don't really listen to Dan's broadcasts that much anymore. I used to listen to it religiously. Daily. Now that I'm doing my own podcast, I'm trying not to pollute my or pre dis predispose me to issues that I think I would get from doing Dan, I follow up with Robert Barnes and Viva Frei on the legal so and the Rekieta law and some other YouTube channels on the legal aspects, then I try to read the news as much as I can, and read court cases. So that's how we get to where we get. Thomas Talleyrand  6:43  The fact that we can have a federal employee that's in the law enforcement branch. I think he's was DOJ, this lawyer K Kleinsmith can fraudulently make a representation to a FIZA court, he can commit perjury, he can commit obstruction of justice. And only get a week is the next thing I want to talk to. I'm sorry, he's not gonna get a day in jail. He got a $100 fine and a one-year ...
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • Robinghood Gamestop and Corrupt Joe Biden

    Robinghood Gamestop and Corrupt Joe Biden
    Jan 29 2021
    Thomas Talleyrand  0:03  Thomas Talleyrand. Welcome to the populist cast. And here we go, this is going to be a quick one. I'm going to finally get in and talk about this disaster of Robin Hood. And here's the reason it's a disaster. The Robin Hood traders.Thomas Talleyrand  0:26  They purchased some stocks that another company had shorted, a bunch of other companies had shorted. I have 00 sympathy for any Wall Street firm, hedge fund manager, or executive or billionaire who does a naked short doesn't have his ass covered because he's too effing greedy. You are irresponsible, and you deserve to lose your money. Moral hazard has been thrown out the window. Thank you, George W. Bush, and Barack Hussein Obama, Barack. Obama and George Bush are totally to blame for our stock market being randomly it is now. And then the Democrats, the idiots that they are, they go and vote in Mr. frickin Wall Street, Mr. K Street, Mr. My hands out, put a stack of motherbleep money in it now. And I'll do what you say, Joe Biden. And that's the biggest thing that I'm mad about right now. It's looking at all of these tweets from these moronic. idiotic Democrats. Where's our $2,000? Where's our health care? I thought Joe Biden was gonna fix everything. Now he isn't gonna fix the fucking thing. Unless you're a freaking Insider unless you have a job on K Street. Unless you're a billionaire in China, the billionaires in China went to Wall Street and they recruited Joe Biden Iran because he's the most corrupt politician we've had in the last 50 years. 50 years this guy has had his hand out, he is demanded that he gets paid. And then if you pay him, he does what you pay him to do. Really, you either have to be extremely naive or extremely ignorant, in order to thought that Joe Biden was going to come in here and fight for the little guy when you vote for a corporatist that's an insider with a long history of corruption, the man that transferred the risk of moral hazard from the credit card companies onto the blue-collar worker when he rewrote the bankruptcy bill. Back in the 2000s. under Bush, tried he ganged up with bush and Schumer and they rewrote the credit card, the bankruptcy bill so that if you make any amount of money whatsoever, you can't discharge credit cards, under Chapter Seven, for those of you who don't know, moral hazard in the stock market is that you can lose your business. If you bet the wrong way. However, we removed that and 2008. And really, we transferred that from the banks to the American taxpayer, both with the aforesaid credit card, bankruptcy changes, the bankruptcy law changes, but also with the 2008 bailout. It was started by President Bush and finished off by Obama, but it was Clinton Central, insider deep state politics where the big guy doesn't have to take a bath in the little guy does. They did that under the guise that well, if we let all these foreclosures go through, and we let all these banks lose all of this money, they'll all go out of business and we'll go into a depression. Instead, what we had was essentially a prolonged malaise or a prolonged situation with no growth until Trump came in and started playing some things. This is why I am so frustrated with the people who fell for orange man bad. Who cares what the guy says, Who cares what his status is? Who cares how great he sounds? Or how articulate he is.  it's not style over substance. you're hiring the guy for a job, you're not trying to date him. You're not trying to set him up with your daughter. You're not setting him up with your son. You're not even gonna let him pet your dog. All you wanting to do is run the country yet. Hey, orange, man bad. I mean, there's that one time he said that thing about Charlotte. You know, he dared say that the left-wing people were as bad as the right-wing people when we all know damn good and well the crazies in anTifa about his racist visit crazies in the Ku Klux Klan, and many ways they're the exact same organization. They are used by the democrats to depress vote or to increase But where they see fit. That's what they did with the clan. That's what they're doing with Antifa. The stuff is getting old. Here's a text from Dave Portnoy. The thing that drives me and so many people nuts is Lovelace that when did this is over guys like Ken Griffin from Citadel, Gabriel Plotkin from Melvin Steve Cohen and Vlad will be at some secret Country Club laughing at all of us. And deep down we know we arrived. Lauren Bobert plates. first big tech-centered conservatives. Now it appears big tech is colluding with Wall Street to bail out hedge funds. After private investors beat them at their own game. Congress should subpoena Robin Hood and anyone involved with the GameStop halt and make them explain themselves. Here's the thing, but Congress centering or subpoenaing anybody, Congress does not have the ability to do a criminal investigation, they damn sure don't have the ability to do any kind of deep ...
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • Parler VS Amazon Ruling

    Parler VS Amazon Ruling
    Jan 25 2021
    Episode_4Sun, 1/24 6:34PM • 21:47SPEAKERSThomas TalleyrandThomas Talleyrand  00:02Hello, this is Thomas Talleyrand and welcome to the populous gas.Thomas Talleyrand  00:11Okay, here we go. Episode Four. In today's episode, we're gonna discuss Fox ratings chose first few days, Amazon verse parlor, Trump's pardons. And you can't believe Amazon's take on mail-in voting. It looks like Amazon is against mail-in voting. But first, let's listen to one of the splendid questions by the press. Like this one by a guy that Brett Hume seems to think is George Camden.00:57The crowd than the acceptance speech at the convention, the big crowd at the inauguration big rallies because of the COVID. This president has been denied although says he ever been at all wistful about sort of listening the fun parts.Thomas Talleyrand  01:18I mean that is so fricking weak. What a stupid question. It's almost as bad as the one asking about the color scheme on Air Force One. It's obvious that the press is going to cover Joe Biden very favorably, they're going to try to cover up for him. They are going to lie to us, they're going to lie to their subscribers. But even the New York Times subscribers are getting mad when the New York Times waste two articles on a peloton bike and what fricking watch Joe's wearing like anyone cares. Fox News and other news has dropped to third place among cable news channels last week, CNN finished first msnbc was third. Excuse me second. And Fox News garnered a hefty 1.7 million daily and 3.2 million for primetime most of which are for Tucker Carlson. Everybody sick and tired of Sean Hannity. He says the same thing over and over, bought and paid for bought and paid for doesn't do anything. And it gives a voice to the idiots like McConnell. And he lets other people like Lindsey Graham Come on his show. But luckily, Chris star Walt will never be able to influence the counting of an election again, because they fired is worthless. I'm trying not to cuss although I think it makes me flow better. If anybody wants to make a comment @populistcast on Twitter, or @tomtalleyrand Twitter, I gotta tell you just doing the research for this makes me sick. I've actually started this podcast about four times. And every time it gets so irritating that I find myself not flowing and not having a good attitude, which I definitely want to do. And Biden's first day in office, really he did 15 executive orders, he instantly cut 10s of 1000s of jobs. I'm gonna say it's probably if you do an economic benefit statement or study, his first 15 alone, executive orders will have cost hundreds of 1000s of jobs. He did rail back are peeled back on the $15 an hour minimum wage, and just make that for federal employers. However, large employers that benefit from lower-wage starting out type jobs such as McDonald's, are already starting to automate as much of their process as possible. And they're going to roll that out over the years does this franchise just due to the high minimum wages on the West Coast? Speaking of hourly wages and the minimum wage, Amazon is trying to fight against being unionized. They have a distribution center I believe it is in Alabama. The workers there are fighting to unionize that plant or that distribution center. And Amazon is coming out against them being able to do mail and voting because melon voting according to Jeff Bezos and Amazon is not safe. At least that's what they represent it to the National Labor review board the NLRB, and I'm sure that Biden will rein the NLRB in and keep them from helping the union employees get their mail-in balloting so that they don't have to be exposed to COVID, I'm sure is their excuse. As we all know, mail and balloting is ripe for fraud. There's absolutely zero proof that it is safe. And from what we've just seen, we know it's extremely unsafe, especially when want to be union people are involved in counting the votes.Thomas Talleyrand  05:27However, Facebook has moved on to other priorities, they are fact-checking the claims that cutting off the Keystone pipeline and ending fracking will end jobs. They're classifying construction jobs, which everyone I've ever known them is somewhat temporary. They're usually only for the life of the job. And that is usually broken down into subcontracts. Hence, the terminology contractor subcontractor that we're all familiar with. welders can make $100 an hour, they can even make more in some cases. So you got somebody that can work for six months out of the year, and then they can go somewhere else and work another six months when it's not frozen in the Arctic. Waste of Canada. I don't understand how excuse me, I do not understand how Facebook is finding it necessary to cover for Joe Biden, I thought Joe Biden was the truthful candidate. We all know that's not true. Joe Biden said 50 years in public life to tell us what kind of person he is. And we know what kind of person he is. He's a racist. He is pro-big business. He is ...
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins