Using An App To Get Off Your Phone, And The Research That Says AI Is Affecting Our Brain cover art

Using An App To Get Off Your Phone, And The Research That Says AI Is Affecting Our Brain

Using An App To Get Off Your Phone, And The Research That Says AI Is Affecting Our Brain

Listen for free

View show details

I'd love to hear from you. Get in touch!

📱 Bond — The Social Media App That Wants To Cure Your Doom-Scrolling — TechCrunch

  • Bond launched this week as a social media platform explicitly designed to get you off your phone — no infinite feed, no algorithmic scroll, just a spatial view of what your friends are up to and activity recommendations based on your interests
  • The core bet: remove the vertical feed and you remove the addictive pattern — the app gives you ideas for real-world activities, you go live them, you get off the app
  • I haven't tested it, but I have a lot of thoughts
  • First: using an app to get off your phone is paradoxical — your phone is still your phone, and everything else addictive is still on it
  • Second: removing the feed doesn't remove social comparison — seeing what friends are up to, peeking at their memories, knowing they got a promotion — that's still there, and social comparison is one of the more reliably damaging patterns in existing platforms
  • Third — and this one I can't let go: end-to-end encryption is described as "a priority for us in the near future after launch" — meaning right now, the team can see your data — storing data securely is not the same as private data
  • The monetisation path is also unresolved — licensing user data to AI companies and product recommendations with merchant commissions are both on the table
  • My honest read: the intent seems genuine, but the medium is still a phone, the social comparison patterns are still present, and the privacy foundations aren't there yet

🧠 Concerns Grow That AI Is Damaging Users' Cognitive Abilities — Futurism

  • MIT researchers split 54 participants into three groups — ChatGPT, Google search, and own knowledge only — and measured brain activity via EEG during essay writing tasks
  • Students using ChatGPT consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioural levels — and got lazier with each consecutive essay
  • Brain activation in areas corresponding to creativity and information processing was significantly lower — and participants struggled to recall or quote their own AI-written essays
  • This connects directly to cognitive surrender — the University of Pennsylvania finding I covered in an earlier episode — where people predominantly chose to use the chatbot even when they didn't need to
  • My take: there are always trade-offs, and if you don't know them, you're still making them — taking the car everywhere instead of walking has a physical cost; outsourcing your thinking has a cognitive cost
  • The question isn't whether to use AI — it's which tasks should stay yours: framing a research problem, deciding what questions to ask, writing the first draft of your own ideas — these are the muscles that atrophy fastest
  • The concept from UX that keeps coming to mind: learned helplessness — users who stop trying because they've been trained to feel that the tool, or in this case they themselves, can't do it without help
  • The constant I'd advocate for regardless of how AI evolves: keep thinking, keep practising critical judgment, keep owning the reasoning — the human brain is shaped to do this, and it needs the exercise

Support the show

Help me improve the show HERE

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet