Episodes

  • Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen

    Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen
    Feb 11 2026
    1. The Case at the Supreme Court The case is Trump v. Vos Selections, argued on Nov. 5, 2025.Small businesses are challenging Trump-era tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 2. Central Legal Questions Does IEEPA’s power to “regulate imports” include authority to impose tariffs?Did Congress delegate too much taxing authority to the President?→ This triggers two major constitutional doctrines: Non‑Delegation Doctrine – Congress cannot hand over core lawmaking powers (like taxation) without clear limits.Major Questions Doctrine – Major economic or political actions require explicit congressional authorization. 3. Constitutional Tension Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to: Lay and collect taxes/tariffsRegulate commerce with foreign nations Tariffs sit at the intersection of foreign policy (executive power) and taxation (legislative power). 4. Oral Argument Themes Justices skeptical of Trump’s argument: Roberts – Concerned tariffs are fundamentally taxes on Americans, which is Congress’s domain.Gorsuch & Barrett – Pressed the need for clear statutory limits; worried about unchecked executive authority. Justices leaning toward upholding the tariffs: Kavanaugh – Emphasized long history of broad presidential discretion in foreign affairs.Thomas – Focused on historical practice of using tariffs as trade tools.Alito – Concerned about practical impacts and the large reliance interests ($133B already collected). 5. Predicted Outcome (from the document’s speaker) Expected ruling: 5–4 in favor of Trump, upholding tariff authority.Predicted majority: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh + either Barrett or Gorsuch.Reasoning: Court is reluctant to disrupt years of foreign policy and economic decisions already relying on the tariffs.Institutional stability concerns—similar to Roberts’ reasoning in the Affordable Care Act case. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    36 mins
  • BONUS POD: Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up

    BONUS POD: Media Tried Linking Trump to Epstein — a Phone Call in 2006 Just Blew That Up
    Feb 10 2026

    1. Trump’s 2006 Call to Police About Epstein

    • According to a 2019 FBI interview with the Palm Beach police chief, Donald Trump called the chief in 2006, saying:
      • Epstein’s behavior with underage girls was widely known.
      • Ghislaine Maxwell was “evil” and should be investigated.
    • Trump said he left an event when he saw teenagers present and later banned Epstein from Mar‑a‑Lago.

    2. Contrast With Media Narratives

    • These details contradict media implications that Trump hid involvement with Epstein.
    • It frames Trump as wanting Epstein stopped early in the investigation.

    3. Trump Responds to Questions About Epstein Files

    • During a recent Oval Office exchange, CNN’s Caitlin Collins asked about redactions in released Epstein documents.
    • Trump stated:
      • Too much was released, not too little.
      • The country should “move on.”
      • Nothing incriminating about him emerged.

    4. Ghislaine Maxwell’s Congressional Deposition

    • Maxwell appeared virtually before the House Oversight Committee.
    • She invoked the Fifth Amendment for every question, including:
      • Whether she was close to Epstein
      • Whether she helped traffic girls
      • Whether she instructed girls to provide sexual favors
      • Whether she surrounded herself and Epstein with influential people
      • Whether she would name other co‑conspirators
    • Her lawyer stated she is protecting her appeal.
    • Lawmakers received no substantive answers.

    Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

    X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy

    SuperBowl, CA Taxes, Follow the DEI Money & VA Assault on Democracy
    Feb 9 2026
    1. Super Bowl & Cultural Commentary The discussion opens with dismissive reactions to the Super Bowl halftime show, particularly focusing on Bad Bunny.The Celebrity political signaling is a cultural backlash as exaggerated or performative.Cultural change is being pushed by elites rather than organically embraced. 2. California Tax Policy Critique California’s tax system punishes high earners and visiting performers, especially athletes.Example cited: NFL player bonuses allegedly being taxed at levels exceeding the bonus itself due to “duty day” rules.California is economically self-destructive, encouraging talent and businesses to leave the state.Texas and other low-tax states are contrasted as more economically rational alternatives. 3. “Follow the Money” – DEI & Philanthropy Mellon funding is: Promoting DEI-focused hiringEncouraging identity-based academic disciplinesInfluencing faculty pipelines from undergraduate fellowships through tenure-track positions This funding results in racial discrimination, ideological conformity, and activist scholarship, rather than academic merit. 4. Transformation of Higher Education Universities are depicted as having shifted from traditional scholarship toward activist-driven ideologies.Fields like military history or classical studies are framed as marginalized, while intersectional or abolitionist studies are favored.Philanthropic foundations are blamed for reshaping academia without democratic accountability. 5. Political Activism & Protest Funding Anti-ICE protests are described as organized, rehearsed, and financially backed, not grassroots.Protesters allegedly admit to being paid, reinforcing the claim that activism is professionally funded.This is framed as evidence of manufactured dissent and coordinated political agitation. 6. Virginia Governance & Immigration Policy Virginia’s Democratic leadership is accused of: Cutting cooperation with ICEReleasing criminal undocumented immigrantsAdvancing aggressive redistricting reforms These actions are framed as an “assault on democracy” and a warning sign ahead of future elections.There is no longer a meaningful distinction between moderate and radical Democrats. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    34 mins
  • The UN has Their Hat Out, Why the Netflix Merger is paramount in Entertainment & Americans Agree on Voter ID Week In Review

    The UN has Their Hat Out, Why the Netflix Merger is paramount in Entertainment & Americans Agree on Voter ID Week In Review
    Feb 7 2026
    1. United Nations Funding Crisis The United Nations is facing financial collapse because the United States has reduced or withdrawn funding.This is a move to stop funding “woke” & ideological programs.The UN is ineffective, bureaucratic, and overly dependent on U.S. taxpayer money.Symbolic examples (turned-off escalators, reduced heating) are used to emphasize desperation and mismanagement.The U.S. withdrew from 66 international organizations and treaties, framed as: Cost-savingAnti-globalistPro-American sovereignty Many of these organizations are described as obscure, wasteful, or hostile to U.S. interests.The underlying message is that global institutions dilute U.S. power without delivering value. 2. Media Merger and National Security Concerns Focus shifts to a major media merger (Netflix / Warner Bros / Paramount context).Concerns raised include: Foreign influence, especially money from the Middle East or ChinaNational security implicationsLoss of American cultural control The argument is that entertainment media shapes public perception more than news.Hollywood and major streaming platforms are portrayed as: Predominantly left-wingHostile to conservative viewpointsEngaged in ideological indoctrination Executives are challenged on whether their content fairly represents conservatives.The inability to name conservative-oriented programming is used as evidence of bias.The merger is framed as dangerous because it could: Concentrate cultural and political influenceAmplify a single ideological viewpoint The Department of Justice and FCC are identified as key gatekeepers.The timeline for approval is described as months to years, with high stakes for media freedom. 3. Save America Act (Voter ID Legislation) Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to votePhoto ID to vote The bill is common-sense and widely supported, including among minority voters.Democrats, particularly Chuck Schumer, are accused of: Using “Jim Crow” rhetoric to scare votersIgnoring polling that shows broad support for voter ID Opposition is attributed to: Desire to preserve election vulnerabilitiesPartisan strategy rather than public opinion Ballot harvesting is described as inherently vulnerable to abuse.Examples (nursing homes, paid operatives) are used to argue: Elderly and vulnerable voters can be exploitedBallots can be selectively discarded The Carter–Baker Commission is cited to legitimize these concerns.Acknowledges internal Republican resistance and logistical challenges.Emphasizes urgency and political pressure as tools to pass the bill. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    34 mins
  • SAVE America Act-How to Force the Dems' Hand plus Bringing the Receipts on Somali Fraud & Major Victory Stopping Sex-Change Surgeries for Kids

    SAVE America Act-How to Force the Dems' Hand plus Bringing the Receipts on Somali Fraud & Major Victory Stopping Sex-Change Surgeries for Kids
    Feb 6 2026
    1. SAVE America Act (Election Law & Voter ID) Core Argument The SAVE America Act would: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to voteRequire photo ID to vote Democrats are portrayed as unanimously opposed, preventing passage due to the Senate’s 60‑vote threshold. Strategic Claim Cruz argues Republicans should: Force a “real” filibuster (continuous floor speeches)Make Democratic opposition politically and physically costly He frames Democratic resistance as intentional rather than procedural. Public Opinion Framing Polling is cited (CNN, Pew) to claim: Broad bipartisan and multiracial support for voter ID Democratic leadership (especially Chuck Schumer) is accused of ignoring their own voters. 2. Voter Fraud & Ballot Harvesting Claims Presented Ballot harvesting is described as: A system that enables fraud, especially among elderly or vulnerable populations Democrats are accused of: Supporting policies that increase fraud opportunitiesReversing recommendations from the Carter–Baker Commission There is justification for: Photo ID lawsRestrictions on mail-in votingLimits on third-party ballot collection 3. Somali Welfare Fraud in Minnesota Central Allegation Massive welfare fraud in Minnesota tied to programs serving the Somali immigrant community.Figures cited include: Up to half of $18 billion in welfare spending allegedly lost to fraudDisproportionately high welfare participation rates among Somali households Democratic state officials are accused of: Knowing about the fraudAllowing it to continue for political gainSilencing whistleblowers Stolen welfare funds indirectly finance al‑Shabab, a terrorist organization 4. Medical Policy Shift on Gender Surgeries for Minors Key Development The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association are described as: Reversing prior support for “gender‑affirming surgeries” for minorsNow recommending deferral until adulthood Causal Explanation The reversal is attributed to: A high‑profile malpractice lawsuit by a detransitionerLegal and financial risk to medical institution Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    34 mins
  • Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Feb 5 2026

    Bonus: Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Feb 5 2026
    Feb 5 2026
    Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too. Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Proof of Life in an AI Age Clay Travis and Buck Sexton begin by highlighting President Donald Trump’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast, where he addressed faith in public life, new Department of Education guidance reaffirming the right to prayer in public schools, and ongoing federal responses to unrest and crime in major U.S. cities, including Minneapolis. They preview Trump’s wide‑ranging interview with NBC News’ Tom Llamas, which becomes a central theme throughout the hour. A major portion of Hour 1 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show is devoted to the alarming and emotional kidnapping case involving the mother of NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie. The hosts play audio from Guthrie’s public plea and analyze the unusual nature of a modern‑day ransom kidnapping in the United States. Clay and Buck discuss why the crime appears targeted rather than random, speculate on possible inside knowledge of the victim’s home and routines, and explore why this type of crime is now rare in America compared to other parts of the world. They also examine how advances in surveillance, DNA evidence, and digital tracking make successful ransom kidnappings increasingly difficult. Throughout the segment, they note that President Trump and FBI Director Kash Patel have committed significant federal resources to the case, underscoring its national visibility and seriousness. Kamala Woofs? A lively and humorous debate about the future of the Democratic Party, centered on Vice President Kamala Harris and the 2028 presidential race. Clay Travis sharply mocks what he characterizes as Kamala Harris’s inauthentic political style, using her recent “Kamala HQ” announcement as an example, and compares it to a famously absurd storyline from The Office. This sparks a prolonged back‑and‑forth between Clay and Buck over whether Harris will run for president again—and whether she could realistically become the Democratic nominee. Clay argues that Harris is likely to run and could benefit from changes to the Democratic primary calendar that elevate Southern states with large Black Democratic electorates, while Buck strongly disagrees, insisting that her past electoral failures and poor performance in swing states make her nomination politically disastrous. The conversation broadens into a larger analysis of Democratic strategy, race, primary politics, and voter turnout. Clay suggests Democrats may once again make a risky strategic decision based on identity politics and narrow electoral margins, while Buck counters that party elites will ultimately coalesce around a different candidate, particularly California Governor Gavin Newsom. Throughout the hour, the hosts reference betting odds, past primary performances, and voter behavior to argue their competing cases, turning their disagreement into an ongoing bet that becomes a recurring and entertaining thread. Clay's Needle and Poop Walk Clay delivers an extended firsthand account of his morning walk through downtown San Francisco ahead of Super Bowl weekend. Broadcasting from the iHeartRadio studios in the city, he describes being advised not to walk for safety reasons and then encountering widespread homelessness, drug use, abandoned needles, and human feces along a short route in the city’s core. Clay uses the experience to argue that urban decay, public drug use, and lack of sanitation are policy failures, contending that visible filth and disorder directly correlate with higher crime rates and declining quality of life in major American cities like San Francisco and Washington, D.C. A central segment of Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show features a detailed live update from Daily Wire reporter Lynden Blake, who monitored the full Arizona press conference on the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping. Blake confirms that a single ransom note was sent to multiple outlets, demanding millions of dollars in Bitcoin, with an initial deadline the same day and a secondary deadline the following Monday accompanied by explicit threats. She explains why authorities believe the notes are credible, citing accurate descriptions of the crime scene, and discusses lingering questions about security cameras, possible inside knowledge of the home, and inconsistencies regarding forced entry. The hosts also explore the family’s request for proof of life and the challenges posed by AI‑generated imagery, underscoring how modern technology complicates hostage negotiations. Sen. Dave McCormick A substantive interview with Senator Dave McCormick, who addresses major national and state ...
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 6 mins
  • BONUS POD: Trump talks Iran, Immigration & Smaller Government in One-on-One w NBC News

    BONUS POD: Trump talks Iran, Immigration & Smaller Government in One-on-One w NBC News
    Feb 5 2026
    1. Economic Policy & Interest Rates Trump expressed strong confidence that U.S. interest rates will be lowered, stating there is “not much doubt” the Federal Reserve will act.He emphasized that lower interest rates would benefit consumers and businesses through cheaper borrowing.Trump stated that his Federal Reserve chair nominee understands his priority on lowering interest rates and implied the nominee would not have been chosen otherwise.He argued that economic growth will eventually outweigh national debt, framing debt as manageable due to incoming capital and renewed growth.Trump criticized Democrats for allegedly inflating employment numbers by expanding the federal workforce, contrasting this with his reduction of federal jobs and reliance on private-sector employment. 2. Federal Government Size & Spending Trump claimed his administration reduced hundreds of thousands of federal jobs, arguing these workers transitioned into the private sector.He positioned this as an effort to reduce wasteful government spending and improve efficiency.He strongly criticized the cost overruns of a Federal Reserve building renovation, calling it the most expensive per square foot in U.S. history.Trump denied that an investigation related to the Federal Reserve was personal retaliation, stating it was being handled independently by the DOJ. 3. Corporate Regulation & Antitrust Trump said he would not personally intervene in high‑profile corporate antitrust matters, including the Netflix–Paramount–Warner Bros. Discovery situation.He emphasized allowing the Department of Justice to independently review such deals.This was presented as a shift toward reducing political interference in corporate competition. 4. Immigration Policy Trump stated his administration had made “great strides” on immigration.He acknowledged learning from experience and said a “softer touch” may be appropriate in some enforcement situations, while still maintaining overall toughness.This framing suggested adaptability rather than a full policy change. 5. Foreign Policy & Iran Trump issued strong warnings toward Iran, asserting that its leadership should be “very worried.”He claimed the U.S. had destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities, preventing it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.Trump threatened renewed military action if Iran attempts to restart its nuclear program, stating the U.S. is monitoring potential new sites.He credited these actions with restoring Middle East stability and reducing fear among regional allies. 6. Third Term Question When asked about the possibility of remaining president beyond a second term, Trump avoided a direct answer, responding humorously.He reiterated that his sole purpose was to “Make America Great Again” and said his administration’s success reflects national success.No concrete statements suggesting an attempt to remain in office were made. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    10 mins
  • Islamist Terrorists Tipping Point in Iran & Netflix Trying to Buy Warner Brothers

    Islamist Terrorists Tipping Point in Iran & Netflix Trying to Buy Warner Brothers
    Feb 4 2026
    1. U.S. Government & Political Context The podcast opens with a brief discussion of the government shutdown that ended quickly, and is evidence of political posturing rather than substantive conflict.The transition sets the stage for broader national security concerns rather than domestic legislative issues. 2. Emergence of the Polisario Front as a National Security Threat The Polisario Front, a separatist group in Western Sahara founded in 1973, is presented as an underrecognized but growing terrorist threat.Iran is funding, training, and supplying the group, attempting to turn it into a West African proxy similar to the Houthis.Alleged activities include: Collaboration with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and HezbollahUse of drones, weapons transfers, and regional destabilization Labeling the group as a terrorist organization is essential, this represents a dangerous blind spot in U.S. counterterrorism policy. 3. Accusation of Institutional Caution and “Deep State” Resistance State Department officials are portrayed as intentionally evasive during Senate testimony.The analysis claims this reluctance stems from: Ongoing diplomatic efforts in AfricaDesire to avoid disrupting negotiations involving Morocco and Algeria 4. Iran at a “Tipping Point” Iran has become internally fragile, facing: Widespread protestsMass casualties allegedly ranging from 10,000–40,000 protesters The Iranian regime’s actions (e.g., drones near U.S. naval assets, attempted tanker seizures) are interpreted as provocations meant to rally domestic support and distract from internal collapse.: Negotiations with Iran are a delaying tacticThe U.S. should support Iranian protesters directly, including by providing weapons Regime change is framed as: Preferable if carried out by Iranians themselvesPotentially the largest positive national security shift since the Cold War if successful. 5. Global Domino Effect Narrative Iran is grouped with Venezuela and Cuba as regimes allegedly near collapse.Simultaneous democratic transitions in all three would represent a historic geopolitical realignment in favor of U.S. interests. 6. Netflix–Warner Bros. Merger & National Security Concerns The proposed $83 billion Netflix–Warner Bros. merger is criticized on two main grounds: Cultural and ideological influence The entertainment industry is portrayed as overwhelmingly left‑leaning and hostile to conservative or pro‑American perspectives.Concern that increased market power could amplify ideological “propaganda.” Foreign influence Alarm over foreign (especially Middle Eastern and Chinese) capital shaping American entertainment content.Content has been altered or censored to appease foreign governments. The merger is not merely an antitrust issue but as a matter of national sovereignty and cultural security. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
    Show More Show Less
    35 mins