We Dissent welcomes back Alison Gill as co-host! Alison shares what she's been up to since leaving the pod, and then walks Rebecca and Liz through the state of our federal bench. We discuss federal judicial nominations from the recent presidential administrations and what it has meant or means for religious liberty and other civil rights.

Show Notes

• National Women's Law Center

• Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy: Per Curiam - "Not Enough Respect For The Judiciary—or Too Much? Arrogance And The Myth Of Judicial Supremacy"

• New York Times - "Trump's 'Superstar' Appellate Judges Have Voted 133 to 12 in His Favor"

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

There's no new episode this month, instead we have a special message for our listeners. We're excited to announce that Alison Gill is returning to the podcast starting in February! Additionally, the National Women's Law Center is going to be a co-sponsor of We Dissent moving forward. We have a lot of great episodes planned for 2026 and can't wait to share them with you.

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Rebecca and Liz explain Landor v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court case that will decide whether a Rastafarian inmate who'd grown his dreadlocks for 20 years can sue the Louisiana prison officials who handcuffed him to a chair, held him down, and forcibly shaved him in violation of the law. They dive deep on the statute at issue in the case, the legal history leading up to this litigation, and what the oral arguments signaled. They also highlight some Supreme Court docket news!

Submit Listener Questions Here!

Case updates

• Cambridge Christian School v. Florida High School Athletic Association

• Davis v. Ermold

Background

• SCOTUSblog case page

• Previous episodes about RLUIPA

• • Episode 4 – Religious Liberty and the Death Penalty

  • Episode 11 – Religion Behind Bars

• SCOTUSblog - "Court appears skeptical of prison inmate's religious liberty claim"

• A Guide To Federal Religious Land Use Protections

• AU's amicus brief

• Cert petition

• Transcript of oral arguments

Cases Discussed

• Tanzin v. Tanvir

• Employment Division v. Smith

• City of Boerne v. Flores

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Liz and Rebecca cover Chiles v. Salazar, the case before the Supreme Court seeking to strike down a Colorado law banning mental health professionals from practicing "conversion therapy" on children. They explain the details of the case and discuss the hypocrisy of a ruling striking down the ban. They also recount the October 7th oral arguments, where the majority of justices signaled support for a ruling that will nullify state laws in half the country protecting LGBTQ youth from these discredited harmful practices.

Background

• Oral argument transcript

• Tenth Circuit Opinion

• SCOTUSblog page

• Amicus briefs

• • Americans United

  • FFRF

• SCOTUSblog - "Does Colorado's "conversion therapy" ban violate free speech?"

• The Trevor Project - "Chiles v. Salazar: What you need to know about the U.S. Supreme Court case on conversion therapy"

• The American Psychiatric Association's position on conversion therapy

• The American Psychological Association's position on conversion therapy

• The American Medical Association's position on conversion therapy

• "LGBTQ Policy Spotlight: From Conversion "Therapy" Laws Protecting LGBTQ Youth"

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Rebecca and Liz break down the strong history of courts rejecting government attempts to display Ten Commandments in public schools. They explain the seminal 1980 case Stone v. Graham, the SCOTUS cases since then reinforcing that precedent, and the growing number of states passing blatantly unconstitutional laws that force public schools to display Ten Commandments.

Background

• "Louisiana May Require the Ten Commandments Be Posted in Classrooms"

Cases

• Stone v. Graham (1980)

• Van Orden v. Perry (2005)

• McCreary County v. ACLU (2005)

• Louisiana: Roake v. Brumley (2024)

• • Complaint

  • District Court Opinion

  • Joint Statement

  • 5th Circuit Opinion

  • FFRF Case Page

  • AU Case Page

• Arkansas: Stinson v. Fayetteville School District No. 1 (2025)

• • Complaint

  • District Court Opinion

  • Joint Letter

  • FFRF Case Page

  • AU Case Page

• Texas: Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District (2025)

• • Complaint

  • Preliminary Injunction

  • Joint Letter

  • FFRF Case Page

  • AU Case Page

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Rebecca and Liz commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Scopes Trial. They discuss the infamous "monkey" trial, and the history of teaching evolution in public schools. An "everything old is new again" episode, showing the impact of the Scopes trial throughout the last century and digging into the latest attempts by Christian Nationalists to inject religious teachings into science curriculum.

Background

• Original text of the Butler Act

• 2025 Scope Trial Centennial speakers' presentations - FFRF

• The Legacy of the Scopes Monkey Trial 100 years later - Americans United

• The Scopes "Monkey" Trial with Brenda Wineapple - Freethought Matters

Cases

• State of Tennessee v. John T. Scopes (1925)

• Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)

• Kitzmil­ler v. Dover Area School District (2004)

• Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Rebecca and Liz explore health care sharing ministries (HCSMs) with guest, Sarah Levin. Sarah guides us through this religious billion dollar industry. We discuss what HCSMs are and what they are not, and why we need to push for them to have transparency.

Background and Resources

• Bio for Sarah Levin

• • Sarah's email: sarah@secularstrategies.com

• Secular Strategies

• Secular Coalition for America

• Center for Freethought Equality, HCSMs toolkit

• Secular Strategies HCMS Slides

• Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) - "Health Care Sharing Ministries"

• The Actuary Magazine - "Health Care Sharing Ministries"

• Southern Poverty Law Center - "ADF supports donor, trade group for controversial health care sharing industry"

• Samaritan Ministries - "Guidelines for Health Care Sharing"

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.

Liz and Rebecca explain the final three Supreme Court rulings with huge stakes for true religious freedom. They discuss the Court's continued zeal for religious favoritism in the Catholic Charities, Mahmoud, and Skrmetti rulings—further expanding exemptions from the law for religious employers, giving ultra-conservative religious parents veto power over public school curriculum, and upholding state bans gender-affirming care for minors with gender dysphoria.

Cases

• Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (2025)

• • SCOTUSblog

  • Opinion

  • AU Blog - "The Catholic Charities SCOTUS case: Some relief and a word of caution"

  • Previous episode: High Unholy Season: Catholic Charities Bureau vs. Working Americans

• Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025)

• • SCOTUSblog

  • Opinion

  • AU Blog - "Mahmoud v. Taylor: What representation would have meant to me"

  • Previous episode: High Unholy Season Continues: Mahmoud v. Taylor

• United States v. Skrmetti (2025)

• • SCOTUSblog

  • Opinion

  • Previous episode: Skrmetti v. U.S.

Check us out on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky, and X.

Our website, we-dissent.org, has more information as well as episode transcripts.