Why Good Cases Still Lose
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping basket is already at capacity.
Add to cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Why Good Cases Still Lose
-
Narrated by:
-
Written by:
About this listen
It is rarely a single “smoking gun” in the evidence. More often, it is Drift, the slow, invisible shift where strategy moves away from how jurors actually process the case and toward how the legal team wants to see it.
We also introduce a practical framework for measurable trial readiness, built around four pillars:
- Cognitive clarity (catching groupthink and assumption creep)
- Juror predictability (moving beyond generic, average juror profiles)
- Narrative control (stabilizing the story under cognitive load)
- Simulation integrity (testing deliberation dynamics, not just opinions)
Send a text
https://scienceofjustice.com/
No reviews yet