While writing an article on moms fleeing the US and seeking political asylum I met Andrea. This mom had to protect her girls from a father and abuse that the family court would not. The article is on https://NoncustodialMothersDay.blogspot.com. We have information on Editable.com if you are thinking about seeking political asylum in Costa Rica

Maryann Petri, the host of Slam The Gavel joins us today and the two podcasters advocate shae some interesting stories and advice every mom should know.

Think the justice system always gets it right? Think again.
In this shocking story, one man says he was never in court, never agreed to adopt these children, and yet he’s still being forced to pay child support. Even more unbelievable—he says the judge ignored the facts and let it happen anyway. If this is true, it raises serious questions about what’s happening in Kent County’s 17th Circuit Court in Grand Rapids, Michigan. You have to hear this story for yourself.

In this episode, Jamie returns to share what happened after his initial court involvement.

He describes being removed from a supervised visitation program, only to be ordered into another program that, according to him, was not properly operating or licensed at the time. This left him confused, frustrated, and without a clear path to continue seeing his child.

Both the host and Jamie also reflect on the role of faith and what they believe to be guidance from a higher power as they navigate these challenges.

Throughout the conversation, Jamie shares his perspective that supervised visitation can sometimes feel less like support and more like a barrier—raising difficult questions about how these programs are used and how decisions are made when it comes to parent-child access.

This episode highlights the uncertainty, emotional toll, and unanswered questions many parents say they face within the system.

In this episode, we sit down with Jamie, a father who shares his experience navigating the system after being arrested multiple times and struggling to maintain a relationship with his daughter.

He opens up about the reality of only seeing his child a handful of times over the past few years, and the frustration of feeling stuck with no clear path forward.

Jamie also talks about what he describes as a pattern many fathers report—motions that go unheard, missing or inconsistent information, and support systems that seem to shift or disappear when they’re needed most.

His story is raw, difficult, and at times hard to believe—but it echoes what many parents say they are experiencing.

Welcome back to Part Two of our conversation with “Monroe Mom.”

In this episode, she continues sharing what she describes as a real-life nightmare—this time introducing a surprising layer involving religion and the host talks about an interesting aspect about astro projecting done by attorneys.

The guest also discusses what she believes are overlapping relationships between individuals in positions of influence—such as local officials, agency workers, and business owners—and how those connections may have continued to impact her life.

From her perspective, these patterns point to ongoing harassment, often referred to as “gang stalking,” and raise serious questions about accountability and transparency in Monroe County, Florida.

This episode goes deeper into her story, her observations, and the connections she believes are shaping outcomes for mothers like her.

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” – Ephesians 6:12 (KJV) This verse from Ephesians is one of the most quoted when it comes to spiritual warfare.

In this episode, we sit down with “Monroe Mom,” who shares her personal story of leaving a military relationship—and the devastating consequences that followed.

She opens up about what she experienced in Monroe County, Florida, including patterns she describes as coordinated harassment and intimidation, often referred to as “gang stalking.”

We explore her claims about connections between local officials, court systems, and individuals involved in her case—and how those relationships may have influenced the outcome.

Whether you agree or not, this is a powerful firsthand account that raises serious questions about accountability, transparency, and what can happen when someone feels the system is working against them.