Send us a text

How did Boeing transform from an engineering powerhouse willing to bet the company on revolutionary aircraft into one where engineers feared speaking up about safety concerns? This episode examines the 25-year cultural shift following the McDonnell Douglas merger that led to the 737 MAX crashes, killing 346 people. From Bill Allen's audacious 707 and 747 programs to the geographic separation of executives from engineers, we trace the decisions prioritizing speed and cost over the redundancy and safety that once defined Boeing. Plus, how new CEO Kelly Ortberg is leading the company back to its engineering roots – and proving financial success doesn't require sacrificing excellence.

Key Topics Covered:

• The Golden Era (1952-1996): How William McPherson Allen bet the company on the 707, the audacious 747 program, and the collaborative "Working Together" approach that created the best-selling 777
• The Merger That Changed Everything (1996): Why the McDonnell Douglas acquisition brought a finance-focused culture that overwhelmed Boeing's engineering DNA
• Critical Turning Points: The move to Chicago that separated executives from engineers, the decision to upgrade rather than innovate when Airbus launched the A320 Neo, and the MCAS design that abandoned Boeing's redundancy philosophy
• The Culture of Fear: How countdown clocks, career suicide for questioning timelines, and a 2,000-mile gap between decision-makers and builders created an environment where engineers couldn't speak up
• The Crashes and Aftermath: $20 billion in fines, 20 months grounded, and the whistleblowers who exposed systematic quality control failures
• The Return to Engineering (2024-Present): How CEO Kelly Ortberg is rebuilding Boeing's culture by moving back to Seattle and proving engineering excellence drives financial success

Notable Quotes:

"When people say I changed the culture of Boeing, that was my intent. I wanted it run like a modern business rather than a great engineering firm." - Harry Stonecipher, Former Boeing CEO

"The CEO of an aircraft company should know how to design aircraft, not spreadsheets." - Elon Musk

"Boeing had created a culture where questioning the timeline was career suicide." - Former Boeing employee testimony to Congress

Key Figures Discussed:

• William McPherson Allen - Boeing president who bet the company on jet technology
• Joe Sutter - Chief engineer of the 747, pioneer of redundant safety systems
• Alan Mulally - Led the 777 program, passed over for CEO (later turned around Ford)
• Phil Condit - Engineer-turned-CEO who orchestrated the McDonnell Douglas merger
• Jim McNerney - First Boeing CEO with no aviation experience
• Dennis Muilenburg - CEO during the 737 MAX crashes
• Kelly Ortberg - Current CEO returning Boeing to engineering focus

Connect with Taras

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

While many have called Jaguar's rebrand "the worst marketing decision they'd ever seen" and declared it "brand suicide," it just may be Jaguar's bravest business decision in decades.

In this episode of "A Case Study in Corporate Fear," host Taras Wayner examines how a brand that once epitomized independence became trapped in automotive purgatory with zero profitability and a rapidly aging customer base. And how, for over fifty years, Jaguar consistently chose fear over courage at every crucial decision point, allowing it to systematically destroy one of the world's most iconic automotive marques.

We’ll analyze how Jaguar's controversial 2024 rebrand, universally mocked as "brand suicide," might actually represent the most courageous business decision the company has made in decades. When Managing Director Rawdon Glover bravely declared he was "willing to lose 85% of current customers to save the brand," he chose the bold, uncompromising vision that Sir William Lyons would have embraced.

Timeline of Events

· 1922: Founded as Swallow Sidecar Company by Sir William Lyons

· 1948: XK120 becomes fastest production car in the world

· 1951-1957: Dominates Le Mans with C-Type and D-Type victories

· 1961: E-Type launches - Enzo Ferrari calls it "the most beautiful car ever made"

· 1966: Merges with British Motor Corporation (first fear-driven decision)

· 1968: Government forces merger creating British Leyland Motor Corporation

· 1970s: Production stagnates despite XJ6 being rated "best car in the world"

· 1984: Spun off as independent public company under Margaret Thatcher

· 1989: Ford acquires Jaguar after bidding war with GM

· 1999-2009: Ford ownership results in zero profitability for 19 years

· 2008: Tata Motors acquires Jaguar from Ford

· 2012: Tesla Model S redefines luxury car market

· November 2024: Controversial rebrand launches with "Copy Nothing" campaign

· December 2024: Jaguar stops production, preparing for EV-only 2026 return

Key Quotes

Sir William Lyons: "Cars should be sculptures that happened to move, not just machines that happened to look decent."

Enzo Ferrari: "The E-Type is the most beautiful car ever made."

Car and Driver on X-Type: "The X-Type feels like a Ford wearing a Jaguar costume."

Rawdon Glover: "We're willing to lose 85% of our current customers to save the brand."

Rawdon Glover: "To bring back such a globally renowned brand, we had to be fearless."

Further Reading & Resources

· "Jaguar: History of a Classic" by Andrew Whyte

· "The Most Beautiful Car Ever Made" documentary on Jaguar E-Type

· YOUTUBE: Jaguar - The FULL Story of What Happened – https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=yyY5kqqVq1k

Connect with Taras

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

After 99 years of guarding their secret formula, Coca-Cola made the boldest move in consumer goods history. When Pepsi's taste tests revealed that consumers preferred their sweeter formula 57% of the time, Coca-Cola panicked and took the unthinkable step – they altered their sacred recipe.

In this episode of "A Case Study in Corporate Fear," host Taras Wayner examines how fear transformed the world's most successful beverage company into the architect of its near destruction. From Coca-Cola's rise as an American icon to Pepsi's psychological warfare through the "Pepsi Challenge," we uncover how brilliant leaders can make disastrously foolish decisions when driven by fear.

But this isn't just another corporate disaster story. This is about discovering that there's an antidote to fear – and how Coca-Cola's response to their mistake turned one of the biggest blunders in business history into one of the greatest comebacks ever.

Timeline of Events

· 1886: Dr. John Stith Pemberton creates Coca-Cola as medicinal tonic

· 1915: Iconic contour bottle design created (inspired by cocoa bean, not cola nut)

· 1931: Santa Claus advertising campaign begins, creating modern Santa image

· 1945: Coke available in 120 countries after WWII expansion

· 1975: Pepsi launches "Pepsi Challenge" taste tests

· 1983: Michael Jackson signs record-breaking $5M Pepsi endorsement deal

· 1984: Coca-Cola conducts 200,000 consumer taste tests

· April 23, 1985: Roberto Goizueta announces New Coke formula change

· July 10, 1985: Coca-Cola Classic returns after 79-day New Coke disaster

· 2002: "Coke II" (rebranded New Coke) quietly discontinued

Essential Books

· I'd Like the World to Buy a Coke by David Greising - Comprehensive Coca-Cola corporate history

· Blink by Malcolm Gladwell - Analysis of taste test psychology and New Coke case study

· The Real Thing: Truth and Power at the Coca-Cola Company by Constance Hays - Inside look at corporate culture

· Secret Formula by Frederick Allen - Definitive history of Coca-Cola from founding to modern era

· Citizen Coke by Bartow Elmore - Environmental and social impact analysis

Academic and Scholarly Sources

· Harvard Business Review case studies on New Coke disaster

· Journal of Marketing Research papers on taste testing methodology

· Journal of Consumer Psychology articles on brand loyalty vs. product preference

Documentary Films and Video

· The Cola Wars - Documentary series on Pepsi vs. Coca-Cola rivalry

· Coca-Cola: The Real Story - Corporate history documentary

Connect with Taras

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

How did Atari go from a $250 startup to controlling 80% of the video game market, only to collapse in one of corporate history's most spectacular failures? In this episode of "A Case Study in Corporate Fear," host Taras Wayner explores the company that invented the modern gaming industry – and how paralyzing fear destroyed it all.

Journey back to 1972 Sunnyvale, where Nolan Bushnell and Ted Dabney created Pong in a converted roller rink, establishing a revolutionary culture where programmers were rock stars and board meetings happened in hot tubs. But when Warner Communications acquired Atari in 1976, towel industry executive Ray Kassar transformed creative chaos into corporate control—unleashing fears that brought down a gaming giant.

Discover how fear of losing control led Kassar to dismiss four legendary programmers responsible for 60% of sales, directly creating Activision. Learn about the fear of competition that triggered disastrous decisions, the fear of cannibalization that abandoned the PC market, and the fear of losing brand identity that resulted in the infamous E.T. game—ultimately buried in a New Mexico desert.

This catastrophe triggered the Great Video Game Crash of 1983, causing industry revenue to plummet 97% in what the Japanese called "Atari Shock." From Bushnell's vision to Nintendo's rise from the ashes, discover how fear-based leadership remains painfully relevant for today's business leaders.

Timeline of Events

• 1972: Atari founded, Pong released
• 1975: Sears exclusive home Pong console
• 1976: Warner Communications acquires Atari for $28 million
• 1977: Atari 2600 launched
• 1979: Ray Kassar becomes CEO, Warren Robinett creates first Easter egg
• 1980: The "Gang of Four" leaves to form Activision
• 1982: Pac-Man overproduction disaster, E.T. rights acquired
• 1983: E.T. released and buried, market crash begins
• 1984: Atari sold to Jack Tramiel for $240 million in promissory notes

Notable Quotes

Nolan Bushnell: "What amazing thing can we build next?"

Ray Kassar: "You four are no more important to those games than the guy on the assembly line who puts them together."

Ray Kassar (reflecting): "What I did was turn Atari into a business. When I got there, it was kind of a playground, a bunch of engineers who loved to play games. It wasn't about the business."

Nolan Bushnell: "Very seldom does a market leader abandon its marketplace the way Atari did. When they did, its dominance fell to Nintendo. Instead of America dominating the video game business forever, they lost it."

Further Reading

Books

· Replay: The History of Video Games by Tristan Donovan - Comprehensive industry history with detailed Atari coverage

· The Ultimate History of Video Games by Steven L. Kent - In-depth look at gaming's pioneers

· Zap! The Rise and Fall of Atari by Scott Cohen - Deep dive into company culture and politics

· Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System by Nick Montfort - Technical analysis of the 2600

Connect with Taras

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

Tower Records was more than a store – it was a cultural phenomenon. With $1.1 billion in annual revenue at its peak, 200+ locations across 18 countries, and music experts who could trace the lineage from The Ramones to The Strokes, Tower Records was the mecca for music lovers worldwide. Elton John shopped there religiously, Prince launched albums there, and their "No Music, No Life" motto wasn't just marketing – it was their DNA. So, how did this billion-dollar cultural institution collapse completely in just seven years? The answer: Fear.

In this episode of "A Case Study in Corporate Fear," host Taras Wayner analyzes how Tower Records' leadership let fear of digital disruption transform them from music industry leaders into corporate casualties. While Napster and iTunes revolutionized how people consumed music, Tower Records retreated into the comfort of what once made them successful – physical retail – even as their customers rapidly migrated online.

Timeline of Tower Records

· 1941: Russ Solomon starts selling used records in his father's Sacramento drugstore

· 1960: First standalone Tower Records store opens on Broadway in Sacramento

· 1970s-1990s: Rapid expansion across 18 countries, becoming a cultural phenomenon

· 1999: Tower Records peaks at $1.1 billion in revenue with 200+ stores

· 1999: Napster launches, disrupting the music industry

· 2000: Tower's IT head Kevin Cassidy presents digital strategy (rejected)

· 2001: Apple launches iPod

· 2003: iTunes Store launches; Tower's revenue drops 24%

· 2004: Tower attempts belated digital entry with Tower Records Digital

· August 2006: Files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

· October 2006: Company liquidated for $150 million

Notable Quotes

Russ Solomon (1999): "Downloading music is just a fad. People want the tactile experience of browsing in a store. They want to hold an album in their hands, read the liner notes, feel the weight of it."

Kevin Cassidy (Former IT Head): "I was told that digital wasn't where our customers were. I tried to explain that it was exactly where our customers were going, but by then, the fear of change had taken over."

Stan Goman (COO): "We became so focused on servicing our debt that innovation became an afterthought. Every decision was viewed through the lens of 'Will this help us make our next debt payment?' rather than 'Will this position us for the future?'"

Business Lessons

The Competency Trap: Tower's expertise in physical retail became an anchor when they refused to evolve beyond it.

Fear of Cannibalization: Leadership worried digital sales would hurt physical sales, missing that physical sales were disappearing regardless.

Identity vs. Mission Confusion: Tower thought they were in the business of selling CDs when they were actually in the business of music discovery and connection

Connect with Taras

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

In this episode, we examine the rise and fall of internet pioneer Yahoo through the lens of Brad Garlinghouse's explosive internal memo, which would become known as the "Peanut Butter Manifesto." From Yahoo's origins as "Jerry and David's Guide to the World Wide Web" to its peak valuation of $125 billion, and finally to its sale to Verizon for just 3.6% of that value, we examine how Garlinghouse's prescient warnings about Yahoo's fear of strategic commitment—spreading resources "like peanut butter" across too many initiatives—predicted the company's ultimate downfall. This is the story of how one employee's courageous diagnosis of corporate paralysis became a leaked document that exposed the fatal flaws of a tech giant.

Timeline of Yahoo's Rise and Fall

• 1994: Jerry Yang and David Filo create "Jerry and David's Guide to the World Wide Web"
• 1997: Yahoo revenue reaches $84 million
• 1998: Yahoo becomes the most visited website in the world with 400 million users
• 2000: Revenue explodes to $1.1 billion (1200% growth in 3 years)
• 2002: Yahoo passes on acquiring Google for $5 billion
• 2006: Brad Garlinghouse writes the "Peanut Butter Manifesto"; Yahoo offers $1 billion for Facebook, later reduces to $850 million (rejected)
• 2008: Microsoft offers $44.6 billion to acquire Yahoo (rejected)
• 2012: Marissa Mayer becomes CEO and launches the PB&J program
• 2013: Yahoo acquires Tumblr for $1.1 billion
• 2017: Yahoo sells to Verizon for $4.48 billion (3.6% of peak value)
• 2019: Tumblr sells for less than $3 million (99.7% loss)

Key Quotes

"Our strategy has been described as spreading peanut butter across the myriad opportunities... The result — a thin layer of investment spread across everything we do, and thus we focus on nothing in particular." — Brad Garlinghouse

"Yahoo was a company that never met a product extension it didn't like. They were constantly launching new products and features, but there was no coherent vision binding them together." — John Doerr, venture capitalist

"We never fully committed to being either a product company or a media company. We wanted to be both, which meant we were neither." — Jeff Weiner, former Yahoo executive

"It was the single worst decision in tech history. They turned down $44.6 billion out of pride and misplaced confidence." — Eric Jackson, activist investor, on rejecting Microsoft's offer

"Each new CEO brought their own vision and strategy. And just as we'd start making progress in one direction, a new CEO would arrive and pivot us in another." — Former Yahoo executive

Featured Insights

• Why the most dangerous form of organizational failure isn't making the wrong decision—it's the inability to make any decision at all.
• How fear of cannibalizing your own business often leads to someone else doing it for you.
• The importance of listening to employees who invest in your company's future

Link to Garlinghouse’s Manifesto

• Brad Garlinghouse's Peanut Butter Manifesto (Full Text)

Connect with Taras:

• Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: Taras Wayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

How did BlackBerry – the company that revolutionized mobile communication with always-on email and iconic keyboards – collapse from 50% market share to irrelevance in a decade? In this episode, I examine how fear transformed smart executives into prisoners of their past success, rendering them unable to evolve even as customers lined up for iPhones.

Timeline:

· 1999: Research In Motion introduces the first BlackBerry device

· 2006: BlackBerry reaches 50% U.S. smartphone market share

· 2007: Steve Jobs unveils the iPhone; BlackBerry executives dismiss it

· 2009: BlackBerry rejects making BBM available on other platforms

· 2010: BlackBerry Storm launches to disastrous reviews

· 2011: BlackBerry service outage leaves millions without email for three days

· 2012: Market value falls 95% from 2008 peak

· 2016: BlackBerry stops making phones entirely

Key Points:

· BlackBerry dominated with always-on email and a physical keyboard

· Verizon offered $100 million to develop a touchscreen BlackBerry two years before the iPhone

· Internal fear of cannibalizing keyboard devices led executives to reject the opportunity

· BlackBerry had five major innovation projects worth $40 billion killed due to cannibalization fears

· Company research repeatedly showed a consumer shift toward touchscreens, but was dismissed

· The Storm development involved 17 project managers with veto power, creating a design disaster

· BlackBerry's centralized security infrastructure became a critical vulnerability during outages

Quotes:

· "It's OK—we'll be fine."—Jim Balsillie after iPhone unveiling

· "We weren't just afraid of change—we were afraid of becoming unrecognizable to ourselves."—Larry Conlee, former COO

· "We came to BlackBerry with a $100 million development deal to create a fully touchscreen device... It was surreal watching a company choose slow death over reinvention."—John Stratton, former Verizon executive

· "When I was at Apple, we studied BlackBerry closely. We knew their Achilles' heel wasn't technology—it was psychology."—Jason Murrow, former Apple executive

Further Reading:

· Visit fear-incorporated.com for more case studies and resources

· "Losing the Signal: The Untold Story Behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of BlackBerry"

· BlackBerry's 2011 global service outage and market impact

· The "Bring Your Own Device" movement that accelerated BlackBerry's decline

Connect with Taras:

· Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: taraswayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com

Send us a text

How did Sony—the company that revolutionized portable music with the Walkman—lose its market dominance to Apple, a computer company with no prior experience in the music industry? In this episode, I examine how fear transformed Sony's innovative culture into siloed kingdoms that sabotaged their own digital music future.

Timeline:

· 1979: Sony launches the Walkman, selling over 100 million units worldwide

· 1999: Sony engineers develop a working prototype for a digital music player (2 years before iPod)

· 2000: Internal meeting where divisions clash over the digital music player

· 2001: Apple releases the iPod with "1000 songs in your pocket"

· 2003: Apple launches iTunes Music Store

· 2007: Sony's Connect Music Store shuts down

· 2007: Apple launches iPhone, effectively cannibalizing its own iPod

Key Points:

· Sony had all the necessary resources to dominate digital music: engineering talent, brand recognition, music catalog, and global distribution

· Internal fear of cannibalizing CD sales led to crippling restrictions on their digital music player

· Sony's insistence on proprietary ATRAC format instead of supporting MP3s limited their appeal

· How Sony's music division sabotaged their electronics division's innovations with excessive DRM

· Between 2000-2008, Sony's innovation proposals dropped by 83%

· Steve Jobs' philosophy: "If you don't cannibalize yourself, someone else will"

Quotes:

· "While Sony battled internally, Steve Jobs stood up on a stage and introduced the sleek and simple-to-use iPod."

· "We spent more time discussing what users couldn't do than what they could do." - Former Sony Connect Manager

· "We had the technology, the expertise, and the brand. What we didn't have was the courage to disrupt ourselves." - Sony Engineer

Further Reading:

· Visit fear-incorporated.com for more case studies and resources

· Howard Stringer's "Sony United" initiative (2006)

· Sony's 2009 major reorganization to break down silos

Connect with Taras:

• Website: fear-incorporated.com

· LinkedIn: taraswayner

· Instagram: @fear_incorporated

· Email: fear@fear-incorporated.com