• Episode 4: Researching with Care
    Oct 19 2026
    In this episode, host Jessie Sullivan (University College London) speaks to Olivia Sheringham (Birkbeck, University of London), Rachel Benchekroun (University College London), and Rebekka Hölzle (Birkbeck, University of London) about how we can create more caring and ‘care-full’ research with migrant communities.We look specifically at creative and arts-based methods, sharing diverse examples of our own creative practices, including collage, photography, theatre, storytelling, and sound art. We speak about how creative methods can contribute to more participatory research practice and offer communities meaningful alternative impacts. At the same time we also share some of the challenges involved, and reflect on how many ‘practicalities’ of care in research, such as food or childcare for participants, are often sidelined and underfunded. Sharing our own doubts and unlearnings, we try to embrace the complex and messy reality of collaboration across differences. We conclude that neither care nor creative methods are a simple fix, and highlight the importance of a critical reflection on our own privileged positionality as researchers.Mentioned resources:Fair Food Futures UK Project (funded by NIHR)Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469Hölzle, R (2025). Soundscape of the Hostile Environment. Full audio available on Soundcloud. For more creative outputs of the project, a zine, and an accompanying radioshow, visit: www.rebekka-hoelzle.orgHölzle, R (2026). ‘Building blocks of something extraordinary’: refusing damage-centred research with migrant communities in the UK through creative methods (pp.165-187). In L. Ladlow & L. Way (Eds.), Insights Into Creative and Participatory Research: Key Issues and Innovative Developments. Bristol Policy Press.Home-city Spaces of Care Project (Birkbeck, University of London)Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: a letter to communities, Harvard Educational Review, 79(3): 409– 27. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15Further suggested resources:Hölzle, R. (forthcoming). "This is the academic part... but there should be a fun part as well!" Reflecting on Radical Ethical Praxis with Migrant Communities beyond 'Doing no Harm'. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geographies.Lenette, C. (2022). Participatory Action Research: Ethics and Decolonization, Oxford University Press.Bristol Policy Press Creative Research Methods in Practice Series, edited by Helen Kara. Available at: https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-research-methods-in-practiceNagar, R. (2019). Hungry Translations: Relearning the World through Radical Vulnerability, University of Illinois Press.Sheringham, Olivia, Taylor, H., Duffy-Syedi, K., Atsede, A. & Matondo, C. (2025). Care stories - creating together against the hostile environment. Home-City Spaces of Care.Tuck, E. and Yang, K.W. (2014). R-words: refusing research (pp 223-47), in D. Paris and M.T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, SAGE Publications.Active listening questions:How can creative methods enable alternative forms of knowledge production?How can creative methods contribute to a more caring research practice? What other methods, practices, but also practical structures are important for a ‘care-full’ approach with vulnerabilised communities?How can you incorporate care and creativity in your own research or academic work? Have you organised or participated in creative research projects? What has worked and where might the limitations of creative methods be?
    Show More Show Less
    32 mins
  • Episode 3: Care as Resistance
    Oct 12 2026

    In this episode, host Megan Crossley (Lancaster University) speaks to Franca Roeschert (University of Greenwich), Rachel Benchekroun (University College London) and Giorgia Previdoli (University of York) about how people with precarious immigration status in the UK give, receive and experience care in their daily lives. We reflect on what it means to care and be cared for in the context of people with precarious immigration status experiencing carelessness by the state.

    We discuss carelessness through policies such as No Recourse to Public Funds, hostile media narratives and the constant insecurities of living in temporary accommodation. While these filter into people’s everyday lives, we describe acts of care we witnessed in our research: people sharing a meal, asking for help and looking out for each other in various contexts.

    We reflect on how the physical design of community spaces, from food pantries to community kitchens, can open up or foreclose conditions for connection, and why caring spaces are so often the first casualties of funding cuts.

    Plus: we make the case for care needing to be understood as reciprocal and multi-directional and why attending to small, informal, often invisible practices matters if we want to envision a more caring (and more just) future.

    Mentioned resources:

    • Fair Food Futures UK Project (funded by NIHR)
    • Centre for Collaboration in Community Connectedness

    Further suggested resources:

    • Benchekroun, R. (2025). Precarious Motherhood: Navigating Relationships and Support Post-Migration in the UK. UCL Press.
    • Emejulu, A. (2022). Fugitive feminism. Silver Press.
    • Hobart, H. I. J. K., & Kneese, T. (2020). Radical care: Survival strategies for uncertain times. Social Text, 38(1), 1–16.
    • Nadasen, P. (2023). Care: The highest stage of capitalism. Haymarket Books.
    • Sheringham, O., Taylor, H., & Duffy-Syedi, K. (2024). Care-full resistance to slow violence: Building radical hope through creative encounters with refugees during the pandemic. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(13), 3359–3378. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2345999
    • Vacchelli, E., & Roeschert, F. (2026). Between solidarity and hostility: exploring the paradox of community through peer research. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2026.2631054

    Active listening questions:

    • Why should we understand care as more than a uni-directional act?
    • What do we mean when we say ‘carelessness of the state’?
    • What in your experience contributes to creating conditions for connection and multi-directional care in community and social spaces?

    Show More Show Less
    29 mins
  • Episode 2: Care as control
    Oct 5 2026

    In this episode, host Jessie Sullivan (University College London) speaks with Olivia Petie (University of Birmingham) and Megan Crossley (Lancaster University) about care "from above" to ask who the state sees as deserving of care and how those framings shape everyday life for migrants in the UK.

    We look at the stark contrast between bespoke routes created for some groups and the hostile, securitised response to people seeking asylum via small boats - discuss how the language of care can be mobilised to legitimise border violence and obscure the structural conditions driving dangerous crossings in the first place. We share examples from our own research, unpacking the myth of asylum hotels as ‘luxury’ spaces and discuss the far right hostility and violence facing asylum hotel residents. We also consider how asylum support policies frame control as care while leaving people destitute, disconnected and constantly on the move.

    Mentioned resources:

    • Crossley, M. (2026). Careless Bordering: Photovoice accounts from refugees and people seeking asylum in Northwest England. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/3238 (Please note: This thesis is currently unavailable online however contact m.crossley@lancaster.ac.uk to receive a copy)
    • Crossley, M. (forthcoming). Careless Bordering: Care as a technology of control in UK asylum governance
    • Petie, O., Phillimore, J. and Allsopp, A. (2025) ‘Exploring hospitality, hostility and (un)home in hotel accommodation for asylum seekers in the United Kingdom’, Hospitality & Society 15(1): 23-44.
    • Phillimore, J., Petie, O. (2024) ‘What life is like for the asylum seekers in hotels being attacked by far right groups’, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/what-life-is-like-for-the-asylum-seekers-in-hotels-being-attacked-by-far-right-groups-236020
    • Sheikh, Rahil and Kateryna Pavlyuk, (6 February 2026) ‘Number of homeless refugees in England soars, BBC finds.’ BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy9y3n43192o

    Further suggested resources:

    • Sirriyeh, A. (2018) Politics of Compassion: Immigration and Asylum Policy. Bristol University Press.
    • Darling, J. (2022) Systems of Suffering: Dispersal and the Denial of Asylum. Pluto Press
    • Darling, J. and Burridge, A. (2025) Hotels, refuge, and the rise of carceral hospitality, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 50 (4).

    Active listening questions:

    • The hosts mention that care can be "wrapped in the language of support" in ways that make resistance harder. Can you think of other contexts (beyond migration) where the language of care might be used to soften or justify control?
    • If you were designing a UK asylum accommodation and support system from scratch, guided by the critical understandings of care discussed in this episode, what might you do differently?
    • This episode critiques the framing of asylum seekers as either "illegal migrants" living in luxury or vulnerable victims needing rescue. What do both of these framings leave out?

    Show More Show Less
    29 mins