Concept future cover art

Concept future

Concept future

Written by: YUKO NAGAKI
Listen for free

CONCEPT FUTUREは緩やかな未来トークを聴くことで新しいイメージを脳に描き、整理することをお手つだしします。

音声は聴くことにより、脳内へ気づきのキーワードやイメージ生成を促します。また自身の活動をアクティブにさせる材料になります。メモなどへ記録をお勧めします。

CONCEPT FUTURE draws and organizes new images in the brain by listening to future talks.
By listening to the voice, prompts the generation of keywords and images in the brain. It is also a material that activates one's activity. It is recommended to record it in a memo.Marcury Vision LLC (C)2024
Economics
Episodes
  • Future Organizations
    Oct 18 2026
    The Currents of Future Organizations

    Organizations around the world are quietly changing how their parts fit together. For-profit companies run today’s business, non-profits take on development and prototypes, and foundations hold the long-term mission and manage new forms of capital.

    It is a way of keeping today’s management capital and future capital separate. Companies aren’t disappearing. What is slowly spreading is a structure where a foundation or trust holds the voting rights.

    More organizations are taking on work that spans long time horizons, and AI is splitting into shared platforms and independent operation by regions and companies. Who holds the standards for ethics and judgment may become what sets organizations apart.

    As future thinking spreads into daily life, future literacy rises. What matters then is not leaving everything to AI, but using our own future brain to think. Even a group of individuals, thinking together with AI whose fairness can be checked again and again, could diagnose possible futures.

    A society like that may be possible.Risks and possibilities alike will look different, and so will how we prepare. At FUTURE SESSION, we explore this thinking design and the future of organizations.

    https://www.marcury-vision.com
    Show More Show Less
    1 min
  • FUTURE BUSINESS 3
    Sep 11 2026
    Future-Oriented Thinking Series: "How Do You Think the World Will Change?"

    3. "What Role Remains for Humans in AI-Driven Management?"

    Imagine a company whose decision-making appears perfectly consistent from the outside—adhering to the same standards, judgments, and speed, and never wavering.

    But what if that consistency is merely the result of the system continuously learning from the company's past decisions? What if there are people within the organization who realize that there is a difference between preserving tradition and history, and failing to value fresh perspectives?

    AI makes decisions quickly and appears free of hesitation. From the outside, however, it can be impossible to distinguish whether this speed signifies correctness or simply the efficient repetition of the same mistakes.

    This question may become increasingly critical as AI-driven management spreads. Of course, AI does not strip a company of its capacity for judgment. Instead, it serves as an opportunity to reflect on whether the humans within the organization possessed—in the first place—the mechanisms to question and rethink their systems and roles.

    Furthermore, AI will likely provide efficient guidance and support by drawing on past performance and referencing human thought processes, know-how, and business models.

    However, the risks of over-reliance—coupled with a potential lack of creativity and critical thinking—could ultimately lead to an increase in environments where humans are unable to add value.

    We need to envision something—whether it be shared ethics, long-term metrics, or voices reaching us from outside the loop—that compels us to question the things the current system fails to see.

    If your company’s AI learns solely from its own past decisions, who would be there to notice if those decisions were wrong?

    https://www.marcury-vision.com
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • FUTURE BUSINESS
    Aug 23 2026
    Today I want to talk about how organizations evolve.

    Most organizations evaluate people by role. That's useful for clarifying who holds what authority.

    But it can't make judgments that see the whole picture.The next stage is organizations built on distributed power. Sharing authority is real progress. But in practice, it often just means digitizing equity. And even when everyone appears to agree, dissenting voices can quietly disappear beneath the surface — a risk that's easy to miss.Go further, and you find organizations that shift voting rights entirely. Letting go of control is a big step.

    But there's a gap here too: no mechanism decides where that power goes next, or who watches over it. And the data behind these decisions still tends to be limited to the past and the present.

    So what's actually needed?A new kind of team, built on thinking and possibility, tuned to the times we're in. The ability to sense change before it arrives, and build a long-term vision around it.Judgment grounded in ethics — and the ability to defend it.A way to measure value that financial statements can't capture: the value of thinking, of possibility.And a mechanism that redirects voting rights toward long-term contribution.

    Where all of this points is toward the right kind of rich inefficiency.Distributed systems, digital tools, and AI used fairly — combined with humanity's own capacity to sense the future.

    Put those together, and a new kind of node and cluster starts to take shape. What supports it: forward-looking indicators, and an ecosystem for evaluating them. And human thinking itself becomes the next form of wealth.

    https://www.marcury-vision.com
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet