Episodes

  • The preserved cast that turned Sarah Baartman into "science"

    The preserved cast that turned Sarah Baartman into "science"
    Oct 21 2026
    A Hottentot Venus displayed in a London cage: how did 19th-century medical "science" turn Black bodies into specimens?

    The preserved cast that turned Sarah Baartman into "science"

    In this episode, we trace a chain of documented events linking Sarah Baartman’s postmortem display to surgical experiments on enslaved women and to mid-20th-century medical practices. We follow the people, procedures, and published arguments that normalized using Black bodies for display and experiment, and ask how those methods persisted into modern medicine.

    Person: Henrietta Lacks
    Person: Sarah Baartman
    Person: Anarcha; Lucy; Betsey
    Event: Postmortem dissection and casting of Baartman by Georges Cuvier
    Event: Repeated gynecological operations by J. Marion Sims without anesthesia

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins
  • The consent form she signed in labor that hid the sterilization's permanence

    The consent form she signed in labor that hid the sterilization's permanence
    Oct 20 2026
    A sedated woman in labor at USC-LA County Hospital is told her "tubes can be untied later"; she signs a consent form-how did that expose them?

    The consent form she signed in labor that hid the sterilization's permanence

    In this episode, we trace what happened in a Los Angeles delivery room in October 1973 and how that moment connects to decades of laws, institutions, and medical practices. The episode follows the records, testimonies, and legal filings to ask how consent was obtained and contested.

    Person: Jovita Rivera
    Date: October 12, 1973
    Location: USC-LA County Hospital
    Topic: Sterilization consent and permanency
    Period: 1969-1973

    - A doctor told Jovita Rivera, sedated and in labor, her tubes "could be untied later" and presented a consent form she signed.
    - Guadalupe Acosta was sterilized at the same hospital in 1973 with doctors claiming her husband consented, which he later denied.
    - Maria Figueroa lost the ability to bear children, attempted suicide, and her husband barred her from testifying in court.
    - California’s sterilization law, on the books since 1909, helped normalize procedures that targeted marginalized groups over decades.
    - Researcher Novak’s analysis of over 17,000 records shows Latinas faced a 59% greater risk of sterilization, with 88% of Spanish-surnamed Californians on forms being of Mexican origin.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
  • The Serbsky Certificate That Silenced a Forester and Stopped His Case

    The Serbsky Certificate That Silenced a Forester and Stopped His Case
    Oct 19 2026
    A forester is certified fit to own a gun one week and declared schizophrenic the next - how did a Serbsky psychiatric certificate silence him?

    The Serbsky Certificate That Silenced a Forester and Stopped His Case

    In this episode, we follow the documented pattern of forensic psychiatric evaluations in Russia and how they were used as legal instruments. We outline the institutional history, key cases from 2003-2024, and the procedures that let a diagnosis substitute for a courtroom - why did the system produce such contradictory verdicts?

    Person: Svyatoslav Barykin
    Institution: Serbsky Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry
    Period: 2003-2024
    Practice: Forensic psychiatric evaluations used in criminal procedure

    - One week apart: a clean mental-health certificate for gun ownership, then multiple psychiatrists diagnose paranoid schizophrenia and dangerous litigiousness.
    - Serbsky’s forensic mandate gave its written evaluations near-conclusive authority in courts, limiting defendants’ ability to contest findings.
    - Arrests commonly occurred at night or dawn with direct transport to psychiatric facilities and no formal criminal charge or public record.
    - Regional rates of schizophrenia findings varied enormously (under 2% to 80%), suggesting diagnostic outcomes functioned like a policy variable.
    - The Serbsky Center maintained continuity with Soviet-era practices and rehabilitated figures tied to earlier political psychiatry, shaping post-Soviet forensic methods.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • The DX‑IIA machine ran thirty‑minute shocks and erased children

    The DX‑IIA machine ran thirty‑minute shocks and erased children
    Oct 18 2026
    A banned DX‑IIA electroshock machine ran thirty‑minute sessions on children in a Linyi hospital - how did that expose them?

    The DX‑IIA machine ran thirty‑minute shocks and erased children

    In this episode, we lay out who, where and how the DX‑IIA device was used inside Room Thirteen at the Fourth Hospital of Linyi and why parents sent kids there. We trace the program’s fees, awards, enforcement methods, and the practices that governed daily life - and ask how those facts led to scrutiny.

    Person: Yang Yongxin
    Location: Fourth Hospital of Linyi, Room Thirteen, Linyi, Shandong Province
    Device: DX-IIA electroconvulsive therapy machine
    Date: Manufacture halted in 2000; treatment program established 2006
    Fee: 5,500 yuan per month

    - Yang ran a dedicated Internet-addiction treatment center inside the hospital with a monthly fee of 5,500 yuan.
    - The DX-IIA device, banned from manufacture after 2000 with warnings about cognitive harm, was used in Room Thirteen.
    - Patients included teenagers as young as twelve; some were brought without consent and families sometimes drugged children before arrival.
    - Inside the program, youths surrendered online passwords, lived under military-style rules, and were punished for seeking early removal.
    - Reports say electroshock was applied without anesthesia or muscle relaxants and sometimes continued for up to thirty minutes.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • The Repeated Assay That Turned Two Positives into Twenty

    The Repeated Assay That Turned Two Positives into Twenty
    Oct 17 2026
    A graduate student in a Reno lab reruns a diagnostic assay until two positives become twenty - how did that repeated assay expose them?

    The Repeated Assay That Turned Two Positives into Twenty

    In this episode, we present the sequence of events behind a controversial 2009 Science paper and the lab work, people, and decisions that propelled it into the spotlight. What choices and pressures turned two initial positives into a dataset of twenty, and how did that shape patients’ hopes?

    Person: Judy Mikovits
    Location: Reno
    Date: 2009-10-08
    Topic: XMRV and ME/CFS
    Institution: Whittemore Peterson Institute

    - A graduate student ran twenty patient samples through a standard assay late at night in 2008 and initially found two positives.
    - Instead of stopping, lab conditions were adjusted repeatedly until all twenty samples matched the positive result.
    - Judy Mikovits returned to research as research director at the privately funded Whittemore Peterson Institute after years outside federal labs.
    - Collaboration began in 2007 between Mikovits and Robert Silverman, who had co-discovered XMRV in prostate cancer tissue.
    - The October 8, 2009 Science paper reported XMRV in 67% of ME/CFS patients and became a focal point for patients and the scientific community.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • The ash on the sheets that proved burn pits poisoned troops

    The ash on the sheets that proved burn pits poisoned troops
    Oct 16 2026
    A contractor woke to ash on his sheets at Joint Base Balad - how did that ash expose burn pits as a public‑health crisis?

    The ash on the sheets that proved burn pits poisoned troops

    In this episode, we follow on‑base testimony, official data, and veterans’ reports to lay out what burned at Balad and across the region, and why service members say the smoke followed them home. What evidence ties the ash on beds to long‑term illness?

    Person: Leon Russell Keith
    Location: Joint Base Balad, Iraq
    Event: Ten‑acre burn pit burning 147 tons of waste daily
    Date: Congressional testimony in 2009; Helping Vets Act signed September 21, 2018
    Topic: Documented combustion products including benzene and dioxins

    - A military contractor described ash on beds, clothes, and sheets and said the thick black smoke did not stay outside.
    - Balad’s pit burned an estimated 147 tons of mixed waste every 24 hours, fed by JP‑8 jet fuel.
    - JP‑8 contains benzene (a known carcinogen); low‑temperature plastic combustion can produce dioxins linked to Agent Orange.
    - The Air Force recorded particulate levels; a 2011 Institute of Medicine review called evidence “limited” but suggestive of pulmonary disease.
    - By 2014, the National Burn Pit Registry showed high rates of COPD, hypertension, neurological issues, and adverse birth outcomes among enrollees.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • The Six Tender Points That Confirmed His Diagnosis

    The Six Tender Points That Confirmed His Diagnosis
    Oct 15 2026
    A physician at a major research university claimed he could reproduce tender points in chronic pain patients-how did that expose them?

    The Six Tender Points That Confirmed His Diagnosis

    In this episode, we follow the clinical framework John E. Sarno built around Tension Myositis Syndrome and the patients who crowded his waiting room. We describe his diagnostic signs, his required testing, and the therapeutic approach that relied on explanation and activity rather than surgery-what did those six points reveal about the limits of structural medicine?

    Person: John E. Sarno
    Diagnosis: Tension Myositis Syndrome (TMS)
    Date: 2004 (interview publication)
    Setting: major American research university practice
    Key finding: reproducible tenderness at six specific body points in most patients

    - He reported that 99.999% of his colleagues did not accept his diagnosis, and he declared that figure publicly in a medical interview.
    - His exam reproduced tenderness at six points: two upper trapezius, two lumbar paraspinals, and two lateral upper buttocks across disparate patients.
    - Before diagnosing TMS he required imaging and tests to rule out tumors, fractures, and infections, distinguishing his work from dismissive care.
    - His treatment centered on explaining the diagnosis, expressive writing, return to normal activity, and sometimes support groups or psychotherapy rather than surgery or drugs.
    - He argued unconscious rage caused autonomic vasoconstriction, producing micro-ischemia and real pain despite the origin being emotional.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • The Sodium Fluoride Poured into Grand Rapids That Made 300,000 Subjects

    The Sodium Fluoride Poured into Grand Rapids That Made 300,000 Subjects
    Oct 14 2026
    A worker poured sodium fluoride into Grand Rapids' water on Jan 25, 1945, making residents unwitting subjects - how did that expose them?

    The Sodium Fluoride Poured into Grand Rapids That Made 300,000 Subjects

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries and decisions that led a city to add sodium fluoride to its water without consent and launch a long-running public-health experiment. The narrative traces the scientists, the data, and the choices that turned a cosmetic dental mystery into national policy - what questions did those early steps leave unanswered?

    Person: Frederick McKay
    Person: H. V. Churchill
    Person: H. Trendley Dean
    Date: January 25, 1945
    Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

    - A 27-year-old dentist in Colorado Springs cataloged widespread “Colorado brown stain” on children’s teeth and noted unusually low cavity rates.
    - A chemist for Alcoa analyzed water samples in 1931, finding elevated fluoride levels rather than aluminum and identifying fluorosis as the cause of staining.
    - NIH epidemiologist H. Trendley Dean surveyed communities and proposed ~1 mg/L fluoride reduced cavities with mostly mild cosmetic fluorosis.
    - Grand Rapids agreed to be the world’s first fluoridated city on that January morning, with Muskegon selected as the control for a planned 15-year study.
    - Decades later the proposed mechanism - fluoride working via developmental incorporation into enamel - was abandoned, though the experiment and policy continued.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins