Science of Justice cover art

Science of Justice

Science of Justice

Written by: Jury Analyst
Listen for free

About this listen

Our science, your art.

You've got the vision; we've got the data.

Is our science the right fit for your practice? Is the earth round? Let’s find out. We have created a unique suite of machine intelligence solutions that provide you with the best information in your legal cases. We explore insightful results through our proprietary algorithms with experts with decades of experience working with behavioral science issues or collaborating with legal advisors for successful case outcomes.

© 2026 © 2024 @2025 Science of Justice from Jury Analyst
Political Science Politics & Government Science Self-Help Social Sciences Success
Episodes
  • Why Good Cases Still Lose
    Feb 21 2026

    It is rarely a single “smoking gun” in the evidence. More often, it is Drift, the slow, invisible shift where strategy moves away from how jurors actually process the case and toward how the legal team wants to see it.


    We also introduce a practical framework for measurable trial readiness, built around four pillars:


    • Cognitive clarity (catching groupthink and assumption creep)
    • Juror predictability (moving beyond generic, average juror profiles)
    • Narrative control (stabilizing the story under cognitive load)
    • Simulation integrity (testing deliberation dynamics, not just opinions)

    Send a text


    https://scienceofjustice.com/

    Show More Show Less
    32 mins
  • Measure The Story Or Lose The Verdict
    Feb 9 2026

    We unpack why strong-looking plaintiff cases die by a thousand cuts and show how to detect and repair narrative decay with the Narrative Stability Index. Jurors build stories, not spreadsheets, so we track entropy, load, and drift to keep the case coherent and stable.

    • burden of proof makes ambiguity fatal for plaintiffs
    • echo chambers and mock trial snapshots hide decay
    • jurors as storybuilders seeking internal and external fit
    • cognitive load as the real danger signal, not anger
    • confirmation and confidence bias in trial teams
    • NSI framework: entropy, coherence load, outcome drift
    • operational loop: observe, structure, debrief, decide
    • repairs: simplify, anchor to rule-breaking, stabilize credibility
    • culture change: data removes ego and thanks the messenger
    • use NSI during discovery to shape the whole case


    Send a text


    https://scienceofjustice.com/

    Show More Show Less
    39 mins
  • Architect The Decision, Or The Jury Will
    Jan 23 2026

    We argue that the “strong facts equal strong case” formula is broken, and lay out a new model where trial lawyers become decision architects who win the heart first, then the mind. Using research, case studies, and tools, we map how to design stories that resist bias, reduce cognitive load, and produce engineered settlements.

    • why facts alone fail under modern juror psychology
    • system one drives early moral judgments
    • confirmation bias and the Hannah study
    • narrative drift and the epidural defense verdict
    • intake as strategy and the power of language
    • invisible ceilings created on day one
    • sequential virtual focus groups over gut instinct
    • cognitive load management and moral anchors
    • moving from demographics to psychographics
    • using SJQs and scaled questions to reveal bias
    • predictive modeling to value and negotiate cases
    • redefining what makes a “good case”


    Send a text


    https://scienceofjustice.com/

    Show More Show Less
    23 mins
No reviews yet