Send us Fan Mail

Is the King James Version the only trustworthy English Bible? How should Christians think about textual criticism, Bible translations, and the doctrine of preservation?

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, Jonathan Brooks is joined by Rev. Don Baker to bring the King James Onlyism series to a close. Having both grown up in Independent Fundamental Baptist churches, they discuss their experiences, common arguments made by KJV-Only advocates, and why faithful Christians can confidently trust God's Word without insisting on one English translation.

Topics include:

• Growing up in King James Only churches
• The value of a shared theological vocabulary
• Formal equivalence vs. dynamic equivalence
• Translation philosophy and readability
• Greek and Hebrew in Bible study
• The longer ending of Mark and the woman caught in adultery
• The Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7)
• Textual criticism and the preservation of Scripture
• Why scholarship must remain subordinate to God's Word
• Common parallels between King James Onlyism and Roman Catholic claims of infallibility

Our goal is not to attack those who love the King James Version. In fact, we both deeply appreciate the KJV and recognize its enormous influence on the English-speaking church. Rather, we seek to encourage Christians to trust God's providential preservation of Scripture and to approach these questions with charity and humility.

If you enjoy careful and charitable theological discussion, please like this video, subscribe, and share it with others.

00:00 Introduction to King James Onlyism

02:41 Personal Backgrounds in Fundamentalism

04:38 Debate Insights and Perspectives

07:18 The Impact of King James Onlyism on Faith

07:46 The Value of Shared Translations

09:52 Cultural and Linguistic Perspectives on Translation

12:52 Translation Philosophy: Formal vs. Dynamic Equivalence

15:19 The Importance of Context in Translation

18:13 Textual Variants and Their Implications

20:05 Authority in Translation: King James Onlyism vs. Scholarly Consensus

23:07 The Role of the Church in Transmission and Interpretation

25:00 Understanding Textual Evidence and Its Significance

27:22 Final Authority: Scholars vs. Original Texts

40:53 The Impact of Scholarship on the Church

41:10 Navigating Theological Liberalism and Scholarship

45:55 The Role of Pastors and Authority in Teaching

52:16 The Preservation of Scripture Through History

57:08 Understanding Bible Translations and Their Interpretations

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we conclude the 2021 King James Onlyism debate between Nathan Cravatt and Mitch Canupp, focusing on a key moment involving Titus 2:13 and the translation of “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.”

We walk through the Greek text, discuss the Granville Sharp construction, and examine claims about whether modern translations (like the ESV and NIV) weaken or strengthen Christ’s deity.

The discussion then shifts to a broader theological concern:
What happens when translation philosophy becomes tied to questions of salvation and doctrinal fidelity?

This episode raises important questions about:

• Bible translation and Greek grammar
• The Granville Sharp construction (Titus 2:13)
• Claims of doctrinal “watering down”
• King James Onlyism and theological boundaries
• Gospel clarity vs translation preferences

Whether you’re interested in biblical languages, Reformed theology, or contemporary translation debates, this episode brings the discussion to a head.

00:00 Introduction to King James Onlyism Debate

01:48 Disappointment in Audience Response

04:10 Textual Differences and Translation Accuracy

11:32 Inconsistencies in Argumentation

23:57 The State of Humanity and the Gospel

28:14 The Centrality of Christ in Salvation

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue our review of the 2021 debate on King James Onlyism by examining two audience questions that reveal what I believe are significant inconsistencies within the King James Only and Landmark Baptist positions.

First, we look at the question of Baptist history. Why are some groups throughout church history embraced as spiritual forebears while others are dismissed when their beliefs become inconvenient? We examine the Münster Anabaptists, the Waldensians, the Albigensians, and the broader claims of Baptist successionism.

Second, we examine the relationship between inspiration, preservation, and translation. If the King James Version is the only perfect Bible, what does that mean for Christians who do not speak English? Is it consistent to reject modern English translations while accepting imperfect translations into other languages?

Topics covered include:

• Landmark Baptist successionism
• The Münster Rebellion
• Waldensian history
• The Albigensians and medieval heresy
• Inspiration and preservation of Scripture
• The Textus Receptus
• The King James Only controversy
• Translation and biblical authority
• Church history and historical methodology

As always, my goal is not to attack individuals but to examine claims carefully and follow the evidence wherever it leads.

If you enjoy thoughtful and charitable theological discussion, please like this video, subscribe to the channel, and share it with others.

00:00 Introduction and Purpose of the Debate

00:36 Double Standards in Church History

01:15 The Issue of Biblical Languages and Translations

03:56 The Heritage of Baptist and Anabaptist Groups

04:52 Historical Persecution and Its Significance

06:35 The No True Scotsman Fallacy in Baptist History

09:11 The Rejection of Munster and Its Implications

10:51 The Origins of Baptist Movements in Europe

14:07 The Evolution of the Waldensians

17:04 Heritage and Heresy: The Munsterites and Gnostic Heretics

18:41 Baptism and the Early Church Manuals

20:17 Historical Evidence and Conspiracy Theories

21:34 The Origins of Modern Baptists

23:16 Differences Between Particular and General Baptists

23:27 The Unbroken Line of Apostolic Succession

24:16 Bonaventure and Trinitarian Theology

25:27 The Practice of Invoking Saints

26:08 The Authority of Scripture and Inspiration

28:13 Reflections on the Debate and Final Thoughts

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

Can Christians disagree on doctrine and still recognize one another as genuine believers?

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we examine arguments against Protestantism that claim doctrinal disagreement inevitably leads to chaos, relativism, or endless division. We discuss the difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary doctrines, why Protestants reject false teaching without demanding absolute uniformity on every issue, and whether Sola Scriptura actually provides a meaningful basis for theological certainty.

Topics include:

• Protestantism and doctrinal disagreement
• Sola Scriptura
• Heresy vs theological error
• Baptismal regeneration
• Roman Catholic critiques of Protestantism
• Essential vs non-essential doctrines
• The clarity of Scripture
• Church authority and tradition

If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, please consider liking the video and subscribing to the channel.

00:00 Introduction to Theological Discussions

00:51 Focus on Roman Catholicism

02:14 Addressing the Commenter's Concerns

05:19 The Clarity of Scripture

10:07 Baptism and Salvation

15:27 Membership and Doctrine in the Church

19:41 Understanding Different Interpretations

26:33 Distinguishing Between Doctrinal Issues

31:10 Navigating Disagreement in Faith

33:37 Understanding Sola Scriptura and Its Implications

37:08 The Role of Authority in Teaching

41:37 The Challenge of Competing Perspectives

46:28 The Church's Authority and Its Interpretation

50:57 Closing Thoughts on Respectful Dialogue

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue examining audience questions from the 2021 debate between Mitch Canupp and Nathan Cravatt on the King James Only controversy.

This section of the debate reveals some of the deepest theological differences between the two sides. We discuss:

• Textual variants and how textual criticism actually works
• Translation differences vs. manuscript differences
• Titus 2:13 and the Granville Sharp construction
• 1 Peter 3:18 and translation philosophy
• Whether Christ can truly be preached from modern translations
• Acts 12:4 (“Easter” vs. “Passover”)
• Claims that chapter and verse numbers contain inspired revelation
• The purpose of Scripture according to the Reformed tradition
• Why the gospel itself must remain central in our doctrine of Scripture

My goal in this series is not mockery or outrage, but careful and charitable theological analysis. Even where disagreements are sharp, Christians should strive to represent opposing positions accurately and fairly.

If you enjoy careful theological discussion, please like the video, subscribe to the channel, and consider sharing the episode.

00:00 Introduction to the Debate

02:10 Understanding Textual Variants

06:07 Translational Differences Explained

15:32 The Role of Scripture in Salvation

31:10 Interpreting Prophecy and Scripture

50:18 The Purpose of Scripture

58:14 Conclusion and Reflection

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

Are we studying Scripture to discover what’s true—or just to defend what we already believe?

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we break down a key issue behind so many theological debates: confirmation bias. Using a real exchange on Bible translations, we look at what happens when someone prioritizes their conclusions over the evidence.

We cover:

• Why “uniformity” in manuscripts is a myth
• Whether modern translations actually remove doctrine
• How presuppositions shape interpretation
• What it really means to seek truth in theology

This one gets a bit more intense than usual—but the question matters.

👇 Jump into the comments:
Do you think most people study to learn—or to defend their position?

👍 Like & subscribe if you enjoy thoughtful, charitable theological discussion.

00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Its Goals

01:11 The Purpose of Studying Scripture

06:12 Exploring Different Theological Perspectives

07:01 The Importance of Challenging Biases

08:31 Debate Analysis: The Blood of Christ

17:06 Uniformity vs. Preservation in Translations

22:35 Misrepresentation in Theological Arguments

27:04 Conclusion: Seeking Truth vs. Defending Biases

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

Do modern Bible translations actually remove references to the blood of Christ?

And what about people who struggle to understand the KJV—don’t we want people to actually read and understand the Bible for themselves?

In this episode, we look at two major audience questions from the KJV Onlyism debate:

1. Should Christians be expected to read a Bible they cannot understand?
2. Are modern translations removing key doctrines by omitting phrases like “through His blood” in Colossians 1:14?

The goal is not just to possess a Bible—but to know God through His Word.

If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation.

00:00 Introduction to Biblical Study

02:03 Understanding Scripture and Its Importance

06:43 The Role of the Holy Spirit in Understanding

17:00 Textual Variants and Their Implications

32:08 The Debate on King James Version vs. Modern Translations

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue working through audience questions from the Cravat–Canupp debate, focusing on King James Onlyism and textual criticism.

Can anything good come from Egypt? Should manuscripts be dismissed based on their origin? Did Origen corrupt the text of Scripture? And what exactly is textual criticism anyway?

We take a careful and charitable look at these questions, distinguishing between lower and higher criticism, addressing common misconceptions, and emphasizing why these issues matter for how we understand the Bible today.

My goal is not to attack, but to think clearly and faithfully about Scripture, history, and the tools God has given us to understand His Word.

If you enjoy thoughtful theological discussion, consider liking the video and subscribing.

📌 Let me know your thoughts in the comments:
– Should Egyptian manuscripts be dismissed?
– How do you understand textual criticism?
– Do translation differences affect doctrine?

00:00 Introduction to the Debate and Audience Questions

01:55 Critique of King James-Onlyism

07:36 Understanding Origen and Textual Criticism

14:23 Lower vs Higher Criticism in Textual Studies

24:54 Philosophy and Its Role in Theology

29:11 Examining Scriptural Citations and Errors

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!