Showing results for "The Federal Courts" in All Categories

There are moments in American history when all eyes are focused on a federal court: when its bench speaks for millions of Americans, and when its decision changes the course of history. More often, the story of the federal judiciary is simply a tale of hard work: of finding order in the chaotic system of state and federal law, local custom, and contentious lawyering. The Federal Courts is a story of all of these courts and the judges and justices who served on them, of the case law they made, and of the acts of Congress and the administrative organs that shaped the courts.

Operating in the Courts of Heaven has become an international best seller that has supernaturally transformed lives all over the world. It’s not another prayer strategy; it’s a blueprint for engaging a spiritual dimension called the Courts of Heaven. Robert Henderson biblically teaches believers how to come before the Court and present their cases of unanswered prayers or delayed breakthroughs to the Righteous Judge.

"Federal Court Rules Texas' ID Law Violates Voting Rights Act" is from the July 20, 2016 US section of The New York Times. It was written by Manny Fernandez and Erik Eckholm and narrated by Sam Scholl.

A series for family law practitioners in Australia, featuring Registrars of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in conversation sharing practical insights drawn from their experience managing family law matters across the country.

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.

The *Federal Rules of Evidence* is a foundational legal text that provides a detailed framework for the admissibility, relevance, and reliability of evidence in federal courts in the United States. Designed for legal professionals, law students, and anyone involved in the judicial process, this book organizes the rules into key areas like relevance, hearsay, witness testimony, expert evidence, privileges, and the burdens of proof.

Martin T. Manton was a corrupt federal appeals court judge in New York who was convicted in 1939 and sent to prison. At the time, this was a hugely important story: Manton was considered the highest-ranking judge in the United States after the nine Justices of the Supreme Court, and was nearly appointed to that august body in 1922. Yet his story has never been told in book-length form before, and never with the benefit of such exhaustive research.