Send us Fan Mail

Clarity for learning is one of the highest-leverage instructional practices in the entire research base. When students cannot answer three basic questions about their own learning, what am I learning, why am I learning it, how will I know I've learned it, that is not a student problem. It is a design problem. This episode interrogates what clarity for learning actually means, why "understanding" has been destroying lesson plans for decades, and what the research says teachers and leaders can do about it, starting Monday.

Wanna check our receipts? - browse our research repository here!

https://bit.ly/TDSWIS

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2628912

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Professional learning is one of the most expensive line items in education and one of the most consistently mis-designed. This episode interrogates how PL is delivered, who decides what teachers learn, why leadership must be in the room (and how their presence can backfire), and what adult learning frameworks actually say about how grown people learn. Multiple perspectives included. The research has a side. We'll tell you which one.

Wanna check our receipts? - browse our research repository here!

https://bit.ly/TDSWIS

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2628912

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode, we unpack the uncomfortable truth: your lesson, your strategy, and your beautifully curated materials don’t matter if students can’t access the text in front of them. We explore what the data actually says about reading proficiency, why every teacher is a literacy teacher whether they claim it or not, and how inaccessible texts quietly derail rigor, equity, and learning. We break down what strong reading instruction looks like across disciplines and what leaders must do to support it. Because if students can’t read it, they can’t learn it.

Wanna check our receipts? - browse our research repository here!

https://bit.ly/TDSWIS

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2628912

Support the show