Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

For most of AI’s history, machines have learned from discoveries humans already made.

But what happens when AI begins helping create the next discoveries?

In Episode 12 of Zero to Singularity, we investigate the rise of AI systems that can generate hypotheses, design experiments, analyze results, operate automated laboratories, and decide what to test next.

We explore autonomous labs, scientific agents, causal reasoning, drug and materials discovery, simulation, robotics, verification, and the difference between predicting something correctly and actually understanding why it happens.

Can AI discover something genuinely new? Can it choose which scientific questions are worth asking? And if an AI proposes an experiment, robots perform it, and independent laboratories confirm the result who made the discovery?

The deeper question is:

What happens when machines stop merely learning from humanity’s scientific knowledge and begin helping produce knowledge that did not exist before?

Zero to Singularity — Understanding AI from the fundamentals to the frontier.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

AI can now write code, solve math problems, analyze research, plan multi-step tasks, and produce answers that sound remarkably confident.

But intelligence creates a strange problem:

What happens when producing an answer becomes easier than verifying whether the answer is correct?

A model can generate thousands of lines of code in minutes.

A human may need hours to inspect them.

An AI can propose a mathematical proof almost instantly.

Checking every step may be harder than creating the proof.

An autonomous agent might perform hundreds of actions before a person ever sees the final result.

So the next frontier of AI may not simply be building systems capable of generating better answers.

It may be building systems capable of proving when those answers deserve to be trusted.

Central question

If AI eventually becomes better than humans at solving difficult problems, who or what will be capable of checking its work?

That gives us a fantastic episode spanning AI reasoning, hallucinations, uncertainty, reinforcement learning, formal verification, code execution, scientific replication, AI judges, and the emerging idea of scalable oversight.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Artificial intelligence can explain quantum physics, write software, analyze thousands of documents, and reason through complex problems.

Then you start a new conversation...

and it may not remember what happened yesterday.

So what does it actually mean for an AI to remember?

In Episode 10 of Zero to Singularity, we explore one of the most important problems standing between today’s AI assistants and truly persistent intelligent agents: long-term memory.

We break down the difference between a model’s learned parameters and its context window, why a huge context window is not the same as permanent memory, and how modern AI systems use retrieval, embeddings, vector databases, summaries, and external memory stores to preserve information across time.

Then we go deeper.

How should an AI decide what is worth remembering? How does it know when a memory is outdated? What happens when two memories contradict each other? Can an AI learn from experience without retraining its entire neural network? And how can it keep learning without suffering catastrophic forgetting gaining new knowledge while damaging what it already knows?

We explore:

context windows, working memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, retrieval-augmented generation, vector databases, agent memory, continual learning, catastrophic forgetting, memory compression, personalization, privacy, memory poisoning, and the possibility of AI systems that accumulate experience over months or even years.